you should write reviews or next person will fall into same problem.
I know few questionable reviewers from experiences so I don't even look at their reviews.
then there are many veteran reviewers that I trust.
BTW, fake or enhanced photos are not so bad in kgirls. it's a lot worse in other providers IMO.

Fellas, is it just me or there is a lot more fake pics lately. I know to stay away from the 626 area codes and the 310's are more reliable than the 213's, but seems like I just had a string of bad luck.

In fact, the couple I had were nothing like the reviews metioned, which made me believe that they too are not real like the pics. In fact, there was one provider I had to slam because there was just too much positive slander on this provider and I wanted to keep the value of our TER reviews. And I usually only write positive experience reviews. (If it was bad, I dont write it because I dont want to hurt the girl)

I have to say know your booker and know your reviewers. Probbaly the best way to avoid the TOFTT's that I embarked on. Caveat emptor....

Show me some reviews that reflect what you're talking about.

I've said it before and I'll say it again.
Know your reviewers. There are a few if you look
carefully that you know that you can depend on.  They review
regularly and give low scores when warranted. That's the sign of
an honest review. Beware those with only 9's and 10's and girls
with only one or two reviews. Sometimes it takes 3 or 4 reviews before
the 6's and 7's start coming in. I've only been stung when I didn't follow
my own advice. Happy hunting.

since their pics are popular on CV.  Kim Sa Rang, sigh

I have a favorite KGal agency that would book me with a girl I requested (I request her every time I call but she is not available 9 out of 10 times). In the early days of my relationship with them, they would say okay come see her at this time and I would get a substitute I called the "Old One."  I finally had to say something to them. So I just told her that I didn't like the "Old One." The booker seemed to respect that and now they are straight with me.

You may have read one of my reviews on this exact subject.

On the whole, 80% of my KG experiences have been awesome. 10% okay and 10% I would not repeat.

That is way better than my luck with most other providers which is 50/50 at best.

Your post confuses me when you say that you had to "slam" a certain provider in order to keep the value of the TER revews; and yet at the same time you add that you don't usually write bad reviews because you don't want to hurt a girl. Which way is it? You're complaining about fake pic's and other "fake" (read "inflated")reviews, yet you've only submitted two (2) reviews youself, neither of which seem super critical.  Step up to the plate and let your fellow reviewers know to whom you are referring! As an aside, I have found from my personal experience that the K-girl reviews and descriptions of those gals are a hell of a lot more accurate than those of a lot of other providers. Ciao!

Sorry, I did mean "contradiction"!

You may have inadvertently and with the help of my filthy mind, have created a new word for The Oxford (or Webster) Dicktionary

It isn't clear whether you are upset about fake pics or fake pics and lower levels of service than what other reviews indicated. Generally, K-girl pics are accurate and the fake ones are obvious. I have not noticed "a lot more fake pics". If the face is blurred, I don't think one could say with certainty that a picture is fake (unless it could be shown as stolen (e.g., through tineye)). Again, most bookers will use real pics because they know that repeat business is based on trust and delivering hot girls. Also, as always, looks are subjective.
Could you be more specific about the extent that your experience was different than the reviews? There are always differences based on YMMV and how hobbyists rate their experiences. One hobbyist could get the exact same services as another, but one could rate his experience a 9 and the other a 7.

not sure what happened to you to make you feel theres increase in fake pics...

from my experience every agency has a dog to a degree.  ive only known two k agencies that seems to keep their stables with good to great looking girls and service.  both currently booked by men.  not sure if thats coincidence or not.  

the female bookers seem to be around 70% legit and 30% false advertising in looks and service.  either cause they are women and want to help the working girl who knows.  but i will say four female bookers are pretty shady and have the worse photoshopped girls:  their initials are R and L and H and S.   odds are like 80% chance the girl will be medicore in looks and service.  plus S incalls are pretty unsanitary.  mold and mildew seem to be all around the bathroom.

fakes will always be there.  its pretty unrealistic to think some hot looking girl would do this business.  she can just get some sugar daddy if shes that hot without putting up with our ugly asses.

so as someone said its a lottery but doing some careful checks on TER you can increase the odds in your favor.  and if you can develop relationship with the bookers then they will also be honest with you and not give you dogs.

good luck.

Cenzo, to your point, I did slam a girl. Its still under process of being approved.

I think you support my claim that I didnt write bad reviews in the past, which I recently changed due to abuse of the review system.

I agree on the kgal versus others. That wasnt my topic. My topic was that there seems to be a sudden rise of abuse in cv fake pics and reviews lately. That was my complaint.

Then I guess I've been with a lot of figments of my imagination.

What is this in reference too? Have you seen any of the top notch well reviewed K girls? C'mon guy. Dana, Silo, Su Young, Tlia OMG, Holly, Juana, Minnie... to name just a few of the Stellar K's.

Some good comments here.

There have been a lot of phony pics and misrepresentations over the past few months... the newbie plunge has to be considered carefully via location, agency, and intel via other TER pals and the revs. I have had my share of WTF dates... but then had mostly great times.

In addition.... Seems to also be a rash of really harsh revs by members with 4 or 5 reviews. Somewhere in the thread it is suggested to know your reviewer... very poignant. As a rule... if I have a bad date or the photo accuracy is questionable... I speak with the booker post, as sometimes they don't get a chance to meet the girl. Especially the girl who is brand new and here for 3 days and has no revs. Pending on how thick your newbie budget is it can be fun... but it's a 50/50 shot pending on the booker. I have had some killer short timer dates Snow Angel last year... YIKES solid 10! Then poof.

Back to my point of the harsh revs on a well reviewed girl with consistent marks and a roster of known reviewing monger heathens. The random bad rev should just be ignored... but it does hurt the girl. The K's are different from the indies in that they are here for a short run... and usually do an intense tour, so the bad revs can hurt them and the future of other beauties who may return or future great newbies.

The Kg scene is very atypical... it's very consistent and the quality is great. Who here would be mega bummed if it went away. I can hear the groaning already! LOL!

I think it's important to responsibly communicate bad dates and the phony pix gag with the bookers. The good bookers promote a great level of accountability and accuracy which is huge dividend to the subscribers.

I'm with you on that the list can go on and on. In my opinion it seems somewhat rare that any of the K-Girls are not attractive, and most are smoking hot. Most guys that visit these girls if they saw them on the street would have their tongue's hanging out and dreaming of what it would be like, with no chance of hooking up with them. But we should be very greatful that we have this opportunity and can take advantage of it. Like anything every encounter is not going to be perfect.

you don't understand what I said.  If your're referring to thinks he know's all's, you posted your reply in the wrong spot.

I didn't say it.  HeWho(thinks he)KnowsAll did

So true! If your preference is Asian woman... I can't imagine the scene being any better... hell the ones that rank low are still superb in comparison to what else is out there in LA. Hell... go to Asia and I dare you to find the quality of girls that come her.  

I so agree with the attitude of gratitude... The girls are so consistently great, bookers are cool the pads are polished... I mean what the fuck do some hobbers want! This is where I get pissed off with the Negative revs and slamming. Yes the menu fluctuates... GOOD, yes good ones come and go... EVEN BETTER. It rocks... and we should all be very vigilant about being cool about it. Not talking to non participants, no boasting to civilians bros... If somebody wants to participate they will find it. Gotta be cool about locations, booker names in revs etc.

Just as a follow up, butting heads (the north one) via email. I think I was duped and substituted. I think you will know who I am referring to when you look at my reviews.

Still wanna try the real girl but dont want to get burnt by the stove twice. I guess just make sure you ask that booker no subs.

That said, I am disappointed in the way certain booker(s) subs the girls. Its cool, we need a distribution because they are all just trying to make a buck, but it really ruins the rep of the booker....and the area.

Cmon, why is the westside/midwilshire more reputable than downtown? A few bad apples really ruins the bunch. I'm not talking about the girls, talking about the bookers.