I've not seen either the legendary Pepsi or Yoona, but the fact that this guy is from out of town, and claims to have seen Pepsi on ten occasions seems suspect to me . . .

-- Modified on 8/12/2013 5:51:37 PM

If he's such a good client why would he out them?
He wouldn't. It's more haters who want to hurt the
girls. Even making sure he mentions that now Pepsi's  
boy friend will know. They may or may not do BB but when it comes
out like this you can rest assured there is an ulterior
motive.  
This is a review that should have been screened and rejected.

obvioulsy he's out to damage her reputation.  i've seen her several times and she is always safety first.

I've seen her several times and Yoona once and they always have palyed safe. This guy is trying to ruin their reputation by posting lies.

3 separate reviewers said Yoona did BB. Unless you were in the room those 3 times you might want to rethink the playing safe comment. One guy could have a bone to pick but the last 3 reviewers.....that's a trend. Be safe.

-- Modified on 8/13/2013 12:21:04 AM

So why did you bring this up SoCalSrchAgain ?

Lets be honest here somethings a bit fishy when those three reviewers have only 3 reviews and nearly identical time frames. I dont buy what they're selling. Lets all be careful out there but this is very fishy to me.

something tells me you are most probably right!

...He says: "Lets just say I don't care anymore after my last test."

What is this supposed to mean?  That he doesn't care if he does BB because he has already  contracted a fatal disease?  And he doesn't care that he may be transmitting it to others?

This guy is either a predicate felon by knowingly passing on an STD or he is a vicious fiend looking to hurt this lady's rep. Iccan't speak for every Kgirl but of the 10 or so I've seen not one has ever so much has suggested such a thing and given the strict controls their managers appear to apply it's very hard to believe the girls would suddenly start engaging in such a practice.   Indeed when you read the review the tone and subject are deliberate:  he focused almost exclusively on "revealing" his find and not on the rest of the encounter.  Everything about the review screams "wolf" and betrays an agenda having nothing to do with happy hobbying. If he's done this 10 times why tell us now if at all?

Yes. I had the same observation about that review. Injecting the boyfriend "now he knows" told me that the review is definitely a fake and designed to discredit her. Your other observations are spot on.

I read 4 reviews that implicated her doing BBFS. All are on the first page (most recent). I didn't read all of her reviews, but I do find it suspicious that they suddenly started to appear, but at the same time I can't discount them entirely.

The 4 reviews alluding to bbfs seem sketchy.  I'm sure they were reported to ter, but maybe if it came from you they would do something about it.

God forbid to upset the k-girls community...

You've got a lot of reviews, I looked through several of your earlier ones to find out which kgirls you've seen, and couldnt find any.

I've only had the pleasure of seeing about 10 K-girls over the last three years, and NEVER have I been offered BBFS. Never

Be Safe!

Your concern is nice, but misplaced.  Read the thread.  Some people are buying into some clearly fake bbfs reviews.  Most of us are pointing out that its bs, and one or two are trying to find yet another thing to use as a negative play against kgirls.

You just want to trash these women, 5 times a day be real nonsense. This is a hatchet job.

Why are you focusing on bbfs and ignoring bbbbj, riming and bbbjcim? Are the risks there?

Good point, isnt the latest psa about getting something from bbbj?

Just out of curiosity, what is your main concern with bbfs?