In the last few weeks I have encountered an ever growing number suspicious profiles, reviews/ers, and "agencies" that it simply pisses me off!!!  When I say suspicious I mean with substantiated evidence and patterns, like multiple tineye results, multiple girls on a phone no. (google search).  Many of them come with high rating first review, predominantly with a handler with one review, maybe one or two more, but they often lead to bogus profiles as well.  Often the review itself is written in a disrespectful (A-hole type) way to the lady.  And if there is more than one review, there's probably a low rating review from a real hobbiest who fell into the trap.

I've gotten pretty good at spotting these profiles and "agencies" (to the point where I am willing to bet good money on it, and I not gambling man) and feel the urge to share my findings on the board, with the objective of these fake profiles and bogus reviewers (lowlife pimps) being taken off.  Isn't this what we are supposed to be doing here on the board, anyway?

Now, I know that the TER board policy is not to say anything negative or libel on a specific reviewer or provider, but these scams are spreading out like STDs in the 80's, and cluttering even my advanced filtered saved searches.  Everyone who is legit in this world suffers from this, hobbyists and providers alike.

So what is or should be TER policy on discussing fake profiles, or under suspicion?  Can I post "here is a profile...here are the telltale signs...you'll be the judge" and without pissing off anyone who actually legit?  Should there be a tribunal, with established known hobbiests as jury?

TER make it a policy to not accept a first review of a provider from a first time reviewer.  That is, any first review must come from a reviewer with some clearly legitimate reviews under his belt.

I like that idea. Not sure TER will do that, though; they incentivize writing reviews by giving 5 days of VIP (or at least they did).  They will say it will reduce the number of profiles, cause a  provider that wants to get reviews will have to wait wait or even contact an established hobbiest.  

But there should definitely be a differentiating indicator between established reviewers and newbie reviewers and established profiles and newbie profiles.  Perhaps some color or stamp distinction.

I'm not sure that is true.

I ran across this guy recently and it not only appears he cuts and pastes the same review, but he was also the first and only review on his first girl.  Cutting and pasting the same review a few times is just lazy!  

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchbyreviewerResults.asp?MemberName=maxwell321

Wow...it seems like it is the same girl over and over again...like groundhog day....

not always as reliable as one assumes them to be, especially those who get an opportunity to be the first to revew a new or rebranded provider. Some of the veterans have established a long standing friendly relationship with the bookers and tend to feel obliged not to write anything negative even if the performance is subpar.

Others review rebranded and returning providers using a different moniker than the previous tour and fail mention it in their reviews.

Still most veterans do a great service to the TER community by their objective reviews. I really on these experienced veterans and trusted bookers recommendations when considering a seeing a new girl.