Anyone know what's up with Gio/Rene?  Two ads, two different phone numbers, but same photos.

Plus, while I'm asking, there always seem to be a few Asian providers who advertise on CV, some for a quite a long time, but NEVER get any reviews. Current examples, but maybe not the best ones of what I'm talking about, include Perry, Sohee, and Boa.  I know that the rule of thumb is that 9 out of 10 guys don't write reviews, but not a single review for a provider whose ad has been up for weeks?  Anyone have a theory on what's going on with that?

Just so nobody needs to respond just to correct me, Boa has plenty of reviews.  I meant Cristin.

Christin has reviews as Christine. Until recently she was with the same Booker as that handles Kami ,JJ, Sera etc. Her ad disappeared a few weeks ago and here she is once again minus the "e".

TER reviews of Christne.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=167357

2 names/2 ads: They are either twins (e.g., Judy, Kimmie) or the booker is trying the bait-with-the-same-girl-different name approach or she is working for 2 bookers. Most hobbyists aren't even aware these are using the same pictures.

providers on CV who NEVER get any reviews: 1st, some pictures are so obviously fake, no experienced hobbyist would touch them with a 10 foot pole. 2nd, your example of Perry is no good. She has 7 reviews. Oh, I guess you're part of the 90% who don't write reviews (and don't bother to check either). As for others, there are just too many reviewed hot K-girls available, and more guys who don't want to TOFTT. They just sit on the sidelines and ask questions on forums like this.

Judah and Kimmy are not the best examples to use because they each had 2 TER ID#s

Judy had the same ID until her final stint when she came back and was working a Jessica K out of a historic building just east of Crenshaw on Wilshire. Her reviews got posted on a different different and less accomplished Jessica K's reviews. Judy was the only one working and within a month the agency was gone.

To gistinguish her from Judy ,Kimmy's initial ads did not resemble her. When the Twins changed agencies and raised their donation Kimmy had more representative photos in her new ad/TER including ones of Judy. Even today in the Bay area Kimmy is using photos that Judy used as Jessica K and Joy ( her name during her 2 months in Irvine).

There may be a more plausible reason why there is one set of photos and different ads and tel # including the girl changed  
agencies and the ad has not expired.

You may have noticed yesterday a new ad of Milla ,with new photos, using a new name Rory (wow a revied is alreadybup in what must be record time ) while at the same time her old ad was still up and stating she is on vacation. Go and figure.  

Judy

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=137595

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=148293


Kimmy

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=137066

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?ID=146258&page=2#Review

FYI, I do write reviews. I don't use that account to post on the discussion boards and have no desire to prove to you that it exists. As for not bothering to check on Perry, I usually don't do exhaustive research on providers I have no intention of trying to book, and I thought the review link was supposed to show up on CV automatically. I did say that my examples weren't the best. So, tell us, how many girls not connected to bookers you already know you have you been first to review?

Some girls do show up in two ads. I don't buy that they have two different bookers, that doesn't make sense, the logistics would be difficult.  There may be "crossover" when an old ad is running, she switches bookers, and the new ad is up.  Or she's had some bad reviews and they are doing a "reset" with a new name and new number so she's not associated with bad reviews.  I do recall a couple of girls that have had separately running ads continuously, and I think it was just to generate more traffic, since a lot of mongers can't tell.  And lastly, some girls that are here on a more permanent basis change names periodically to generate new traffic.  Prime example is Hara, who shows to have at least 4 names according to TER.

As for the girls that have no ads, sometimes if you do a search in TER by their phone number, you will find ads.  For example, Perry.  She has a lot of reviews but no link on her CV ad.  

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=173829

Sometimes the ads on CV don't necessarily have a "check my reviews" link on them because the reviews may not be flattering.  Or if there are no reviews at all, a lot of guys don't write ads especially on bad experiences because they don't want to get blacklisted by the agency.

That's funny. You ask why girls have 2 ads and you have 2 accounts. Let's start a thread as to why hobbyists do that. Checking to see whether a provider has reviews doesn't require "exhaustive research". Also, I was just being sarcastic in my answers. You're taking this topic way too seriously.

I don't disagree with you on any of that.  I just don't get why someone would use the exact same photographs on the same site at the same time in two ads with different names.  Kinda defeats the purpose. Usually such doubling up/rebranding involves at least a different set of pics in each ad. That's what seemed odd to me.

As far as Hara goes.  She's had at least one other name - Kandy and had it for years.  The other names "according to TER" aren't Hara/Kandy.  Plenty of times when TER links up a girl with more than one name, they get it wrong and links up names and reviews that don't belong to the girl in question.

...when I can read something like this and think, "I know exactly which building he means." =))

(redacted the street names in overabundance of caution)