Legal Corner

Re: help. amp vs provider a legal consequence
ruurro62 5367 reads
posted
1 / 8

so i am sitting here thinking wow the cost of being busted for being with a provider across the states is severe. as noted not monetarily but in the "dragging" of your name through the "preveriable" mud. i have a high profile position if i was caught with a "provider" i would surely be fired and would loose everything. so my thought is this ...is it not a lot safer going to a massage parlor and getting the "extra" services? i have not heard of patrons being busted for this anywhere. even if they are in their when it is raided it appears the patrons are let go because unless caught in the act of handing money over they are just getting a massage.......... thoughts please

mrfisher 115 Reviews 3796 reads
posted
2 / 8

MPs, especially AMPs, are more likely to be a target of LE than an independent gal, especially if said gal is well reviewed.

While it is true that LE often lets the clients go when they raid a parlour, there are plenty of times that the clients get taken in as well.

Especially while there is a bit of hysteria about illegal immigrants and trafficing of same, it would be wise to avoid AMPs until things quiet down a bit, and stick to independents.

mrfisher 115 Reviews 2795 reads
posted
3 / 8
Assegoode 1 Reviews 4348 reads
posted
4 / 8

God damn you guys are a horny bum-ch, ah the injustice of suck-cess and money, so much so that one is afraid to dip ones wick into a pleasure pot. Of course they have those lockable pants that will keep your butt out of trouble. Going against nature is a no go. Really, you are not any safer with your cock in the hands of a MP girl then in that of an army MP. What to do, what to do? Every sexual relationship has an element of risk, but if you find a good provider, not necessarily the most famous or the most intelligent, but one with her own low profile apartment with easy access and keep your id personal and your privates private and spread the cash out on the bed, chances are you will get between the sheets as often as you testosterone requires. That is how most of us guy with plenty to loose, get to loose our horny-ness with out loosing our bon-asses.

GaGambler 4662 reads
posted
5 / 8

I would not risk my livlihood on the odds of whether or not LE would "just let me go", while it is true that LE targets the ladies in the vast majority of the raids on AMPs, they can and do arrest the customers as well.

Being found guilty and being arrested are two very different issues. In your case it sounds like the arrest alone would be catastrophic. I would advise that you avoid the AMPs and stick to well reviewed TER ladies and leave the AMPs to divorced, selfemployed guys like myself who have next to nothing to lose except for a bit of agravation if busted.

ruurro62 4276 reads
posted
6 / 8

guys thanks for the input....... you are right on......my concern is not the consequences leagally as more the act of being arrested....... i travel for work and so i figured that statistically at least the amp is safer. the problem is with a provider, one they are not cheap for sure but the thing is it is generally an extra 100 to have an outcall rather than an incall. incall worries me as it could be a set up where as outcall i know the room is safe........ somebody help..... plus to be honest i want variety not the same provider ....i know selfish but hey its my dime....

hiddenhills 143 Reviews 2768 reads
posted
7 / 8

Paying an extra $100 for an outcall session with a  well reviewed provider will normally rule out any le activity. If you're pinching pennies, this might not be for you.

Morpheusman 4227 reads
posted
8 / 8

If I were you I'd shy away from agencies and massage parlors. The goal is to avoid being caught, not just plausible deniability if you are. It's incredibly easy for law enforcement to locate, target, and infiltrate a massage parlor. Agencies invariably keep records (e.g. Eliot Spencer, Charlie Sheen). So...focus on well reviewed independant providers.

Register Now!