He said, that the lawyer said because he agreed to safe sex he was busted.
That's the part I didn't understand it had to be more.
I think when I see someone new from now on, I'm going to stash my phone someone though most of my dates are set up through P411 or via email. They might be able to prove who I am through P411 but not all the info there is correct. I change my email often enough, those that I want to have the new one get it. Most don't. My hobby phone is almost never on they wouldn't waste the effort trying to track it down. (prepaid, paid cash years ago)
He said, he walked and LE and the lady where in the room. So they had to have him walking in, which means he had to agree to sex for money and he agreed to a price for a service.
He admitted he fucked up, but didn't actually layout the complete story. Its on the Chicago board for reference.
I was asking if you did nothing else, except agreeing to safe sex how that it was enough that his lawyer wasn't even willing to try to get him off. Its a really low level beef, but it will be on his record forever. At that point, I'd get another lawyer, even spending thousands to get it knocked down to something less would be worth it, people won't hire you with that on your record and if you challenge the system and force them to go through with a jury trail they will settle for a minor offense guilty plea. It isn't worth it to them, the DA would shit if they had to spend 1000's to bust one john for solicitation let alone the judge and the wasting the courts time angle. A known high priced lawyer makes this go away.
Posted By: harborview
so the only thing for LE to prove is payment or promise of money. Afraid that even if it wasn't explicily agreed to, it will be hard to convince a judge or jury. It OUGHT to be automatic, To dismiss without proof of money but I doubt that will be the case.
Did he use a hobby phone? Can LE prove it was him texting? Did he confess to texting? STFU! If the ad does not explicitly state a price, can he argue it was without compensation?
If his lawyer doesn't want to be bothered with a vigorous defense, then maybe he should look for a lawyer who will at least try to minimize the effects.
BTW, WHY did he discuss anything sexual with someone he did not know? You both know why you are there... nothing to discuss. Did she have reviews?