and ready to see old friends and make new ones. So see my reviews and give me a call. 702.283.8080

Naughtiness
Kadi

Damn, and I just left Friday. =(

-- Modified on 11/6/2005 8:12:38 PM

Glad to have you home!!! I know it’s your prerogative but you change your prices more than most change there hair styles!!! I just checked your website about 2 days and it was $ lower!!!

Who'd a thunk. Thanks bra.

I wish she would smack her web designer, and have them take out the damn "openfull" and "launchfull" for when you click to enter (this has annoyed me in the past as well), and then when it does open...could they not disable resizing of my damn window, and maybe not get rid of my toolbar?

See, here's my problem:
I have a dual monitor setup, in stretched mode.
So, when it opens full screen, it spans two monitors, and centers the content between the two monitors.
So, all content is bisected by the side bezels of each monitor. Words and pictures are split in the middle and continued on the next monitor with the space of two 1/2" bezels.

Now with the old design I could right-click outside the flash area and get to my webdeveloper tools in Firefox and resize the window....not anymore, I could open it to one monitor if they didn't disable my ability to maximize my own window...or I could adjust the window size if they had left my toolbar, or just let the window be resizable by dragging the edge...but nope.

I guess if I really wanted to I could change my dispaly properties to clone or indipendant mode just to look at her site, and then deal with what that does to my taskbar and icons...but I don't want to...
I could also just take screen shots of each page open them in a image editor adjust and read them there...but I don't really wanna do that either...
I could also download her entire site and recode it so it would be viewable on only one of my monitors, but again, not something I actually wanna do...maybe I could buy third monitor so that the content would open in the center monitor and I could view it without everything being split in two...but that too doesn't really appeal to me.

It does say on the first page of her site best viewed at 1024x768, and I would really like to do that, I would much rather view at 1024x768 instead of 2048x768, and I could if the web designer would let me.
I get wanting to have some control over how your work is viewed, but to keep the viewer from being able to view it how they choose?  

Ok...here's the thing, web designers have two clients, the one paying them, and the folks looking at the site....if they fail either they haven't done their job well. Fine have it open full screen, but don't then disable everything that I could use to make it viewable without annoyance.

Sorry....rant over...I shall return you to regularly scheduled rant free messageboard now...my apologies for the interuption.

Well I prefer not to smack myself thank you. I build my own website. It is the new macromedia studio 8 software that seems to be causing the problem. I guess I have to change to a BORING bullhit plain jane HTML website so everyone can figure out how to view it. I really never realized how many people out there are computer illiterate or maybe just against anything new, diffenent & cool.

But then everyone that knows me knows I love to be unique and different.

Naughtiness
Kadi

my apologies...

Ok...feeling really bad now....
and the "computer illiterate" comment stings a bit.

I am sorry.

Though on the pluse side for you, bet you're glad ya never met me now huh?

Again My apologies.

*slinks off to corner to think about what I've done*

Edited for the typos I make on top of all the other mistakes I make and am....

-- Modified on 11/7/2005 8:56:47 PM

WT is offering usability feedback. He found a "bug" in your website - it doesn't work well for his dual-monitor setup (or anyone else's, I'd assume) and so it probably needs to be tweaked a bit. Welcome to the world of software and web design- where you have to deal with the oddball "Huh, I never thought of that" case every now and then.

I don't understand why you're taking this so personally...but maybe I take a different view because I deal with software bugs every day in a professional capacity, and I know that much of time, they're really opportunities to make things better and people happier...

My post was a rant, and I can understand why she would have taken it as she did, I really hadn't meant any offense, but perhaps I should have thought about it better and made it more in the vein of constructive critcism and not a rant...or, simply said nothing. That it was answered in kind is not beyond the pale of resonable reply.

I again I apologise if my post caused her offense...I should have worded it better, I failed in that not she. She only answered me in kind.

I was trying to explain why I choose to have my website without the tool bar on there blah blah blah and that I do like to be unique and I do spend lots of my free time working on my website.

I also tried to explain that it studio 8 that is causing the problem. It is a brand new program that I am just learning and yes I do screw with it to work everything out.

Also Webbie dear I was not saying that you were computer illiterate but just that there alot more people out there who are. With the name Web Terrorist I seriously think that you have a clue. Also if you want your tool bar to stay on screen enter this way kadicourtesan.com/home.htm

But my front page does state you need flash 8 player and best viewed at 1024x768.

Naughtiness
Kadi

Let's all pitch in and pay for an hour or two of Kadi's time for Webbie...

Money isn't the issue.
I may be a charity case, but not because of money.
Whereas the thought behind your suggestion is most appreciated, please do not concern yourself with me, be more concerned with you getting your own time with the lovely Miss Kadi, and having your own good time.  

Oh, and as to "seeing some real kissing", trust me when I tell you the last thing you would want to see is is the beautiful Miss Kadi kissing the small troll-like creature that is me....it would give both her and anyone witnessing it nightmares I am quite sure.

-- Modified on 11/8/2005 11:59:37 AM

I've already gotten my own good time with the lovely Miss Kadi, although that's not to say that I won't again.  That's how I know that you 2 could have fun.

I'd love to back off from your cause, but another lovely has tagged me to make it my life's work, and has held her nether regions hostage until I succeed in getting you paired.  So, please take the plunge...if not for yourself, do it for me.  After all, you've got a good twin image to live up to.

No one will ever say to me:

QUOTE: "In the last week, one lady told me I should be an escort, and another asked me what she owed me.  I'm not considering a career change, but my head did swell up for a couple days."

Closest I've ever gotten is, "You look like a truck driver" (from my best friend), and "You couldn't pay me enough" (From various people throughout my life).

So, because you can have a good time with someone, and have them have a good time as well is no indication that I would experience anything other than a pained and disappointed expression on her face, and the continueing thought in the back of my mind (Oh who the hell am I kidding it would be in the forefront of my mind) that she is choking back bile and revulsion the entire time I am in her presence, and is somehow doing some sort of penance by being with me.

I do think it's wrong for anyone to have your pleasure contingent on mine...hell I was 20 before I had my first kiss, and 33 before my second...at that rate, I'll lose my virginity around the time I'm 100 or so...not fair to make you wait that long (and knowing me, I'll already have been dead 50 or 60 years by then).

Now, is this contingency on me being with anyone specific...because if not, I have had dinner with a couple ladies...so would that count?  I also had a lady come to my house once, she sat out on my patio and we talked for like 15 minutes before she left...does that work?

or I had a relatively nice time by myself a couple hours ago...so maybe that would be ok?

I've been in bed with a couple of women (one each on seperate occassions) granted they did build walls out of pillows and blankets between us...and one kicked me out of the bed for snoring...but still, technically I have "slept" with a couple women..(and in case anyone is wondering, they were both providers, but I didn't have appointments with either, one I just spent three days with in NYC...I just put her plane ticket on my credit card, and paid for the room, and the other I spent the night with painting boxes...well, she painted boxes, I painted a box..but they did both give me a hug...which is a lot more physical contact than I usually get, I can actually go months without a handshake or hug.).

See, I have had lots of occassions of being in the company of women...tell her to uncover her nether regions and allow you to feast at the fount of all that is good, and worship at the alter of the female genitalia.

-- Modified on 11/10/2005 10:47:26 PM