Was looking in vegas exotics tonight and Anna is there. Its a new add since she says she is formerly of PM. She is going independant. So looks like Persia is next. Touch was wrong

know that Bruce has been quoted as saying that no girl can have any type of a career after leaving pretty maids ... has Anna risen from the ashes which once was pretty maids ... come to think of it so did Jenni.......I'm glad to see Anna back from the dead .... who will be the next to rise up ...lol...  hobby safe hobby well hobby all you can be ....



-- Modified on 10/15/2005 3:02:22 PM

Of course we all wish her well. Longevity is the key and time tells all tales.

She has a new review (first timer for what it's worth) and along with it have come several pages of reviews from the PM days.  I'm not in "the know", but it seems that if PMs reviews were pulled for being self-written, how reliable are these in her profile?  Not an attack, mind you, but a serious question...

It's not a matter of the reviews being reliable they ARE reliable. Anyone who has ever used PM knows this. It is a question of who wrote some of them. Factual reviews are factual reviews. The only question is the author. Don't shoot the messenger if the messenger is correct regardless of who the messenger is. This stuff goes on all the time here. This board is loaded with politics. Some get caught and some don't. They did. You can question the PM review writers if you want, but if you have ever used them you can NEVER question the fucking service...literally.

We don't know that they were pulled for being self-written. Anyone who wants to edify us, I'm all ears.

For the record, I've seen Anna and Gina of Pretty Maids. I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of any of their reviews, based on my experiences. I'm also pretty sure I'm not Bruce, though I WISH I was Nikki Avalon's pool boy. I hear there's a rather large applicant pool for that position, though...

Bruce strikes me (in my conversations with him, though they were short and businesslike, and the handful of posts he's made here) as the kind of guy who'd get PO'ed enough about the accusation that he's been shilling to pull his agency's reviews anyway, so he doesn't have to hear about it. He's got enough critical mass at this point that he might do OK by word of mouth and other outlets than TER. I don't know that this has happened, mind you, but it's another possibility.

I almost forgot the skimmer for my interview with Miss A.  Don't want to be unprepared for her.

But seriously, my concern isn't that Anna & Gina aren't worth the effort.  It's simply that the basis we have for measurement is the reviews and conversations with those that've seen them.  If the reviews are suspect (which has been SUGGESTED, not proven) then we're not able to be informed.  We can ask those who've reviewed, but with so many others available, it's a lot of work that doesn't have to be done.

I just questioned whether we could rely on what was written.

I'll sum up by saying I stand behind my review, anyway...

But you've proven nothing either way- whereas I KNOW I had a good time with the Maids I've seen. (I've seen Gina a couple of times since my review.)

Where, pray tell, our YOUR reviews, out of curiosity?

I think you might KNOW what you can rely on if you would ever have used PM in the first place. Now you'll just have to wonder I quess.