I'm wondering where you're seeing this. I can only speak as a client, but if I had any inkling a provider I was dealing with would offer that, I would run away as fast as possible and probably issue a prompt warning to everyone else through whatever means I could find. If someone does think it safe, they are really too stupid to be left on their own.

That said, Merry Christmas beautiful

are you actually SEEING this with your own eyes , or are you hearing it from someone's mouth .
Just because a guy says he did it unprotected , or  he SAID  he was offered unprotected ......
doesn't mean it is true !!
Cause men ( people )  NEVER lie !!! ......... yes saying in sarcastic voice !  

So lets not jump to conclusions because someone SAID so .
Now if you saw it with your own eyes , or a lady admitted it to you ...... different story .

with that said Unprotected Greek is the second highest way to contact STD's and aids.
First way is through blood transfers.
During greek act blood vessels get torn and if someone has an STD it is a direct way to get the STD  
through the blood .

Think about Magic Johnson . Why do you think he got aids ?  
he was still having sex with his wife. ( so he claims )  
but she never got aids .
which means or they were not having sex or it was vaginal only or maybe they used condoms  
no one really knows for sure .

Now that doesn't mean you can't get an STD through unprotected vaginal . Of course people do.
but unprotected Greek , makes it even risker .  

But I am coming back to - before people start gossiping and spreading rumors lets be sure one has SOLID proof before talking sh*t.

It amazes me how people ( not saying you , this just reminds me of some posts I have seen around )  
Oh if a provider has all 10/10 then she must be offering BBFS .
or because someone's profile says something ....... it has to be true !!!  
Since profile details are not in the ladies hands  ( personally I think it should be )  
and anyone can submit a problem report to get free vip days ...... ( if that is still the way , really  
TER should stop doing that )  

Geez people unless you have solid proof , sorry it is just he say/ she say .

xoxo CindySpice

     

Of course, some folks are both -- but I would hope that it's a rare condition.

Our beloved Laker?? Showtime??? Say it ain't so....say you jest. You must be a Celtic fan...well Larry Bird did....did.....never mind. Only messing with you
Sign, Laker Fan

Unprotected Greek or "normal" unprotected full service has been rumored to be occurring in LA and other west coast communities for sometime.  I have not heard from a hobbyist's perspective, but I suppose another horny hobbyist is hardly news.  What I have heard from a provider in LA is that a number of ladies are using BB as a competitive tool.

Personally, I would not see a provider who offer BBFS.

to Greece, but if I did decide to go it would be always covered.

No that isn't what I said .  
Since I was never in the room with Magic , never saw with my own eyes  
never heard it come from HIS mouth , nor did I ever see solid proof ( photo or video )
SO , That isn't what I was saying .

BUT , on purpose I did make a certain statement , just to prove a point !!  
what is that point ??? well I am sorry right now I have to get going and I don't want to be late .
cum back later if you  ( or anyone reading this post ) wants to know more.

I know you are kidding me , and yes your post made me laugh ( I do have a sense of humor )  
but in general I am not a sports fan nor do I have a favorite team ..... why ?

Sorry more later . .....

Gotta run now .........
xoxo CindySpice  

   

END OF MESSAGE

Nope that isn't what I said at all .

but , you read my statement and probably assumed that is what I meant .
Why did your mind go there ??
Maybe I meant Magic did greek with a lady who had aids, and that is how he got it .......

You came to ask me if I am saying that Magic is on the DL .  
( regardless if you were just joking , half way joking or serious )  
Someone else may have read my post and already make up their mind that is what I said .
then go tell someone else - well Cindy said Magic is on the DL......

and that is how rumors and gossip get started  

So just a friendly reminder , we all have to be very carful where the source is coming from .
From a review ?? Yeah sure because reviews are only 100% true - NOT .
an ad - ?? Well maybe , maybe not .  
Maybe it is just a tactic to get a guy call , but she doesn't actually provide that service .
While I personally would never use such tactics , maybe someone else is.

I know ladies who post really high rates , but when a guy calls she will negotiate her rate down.
So just because she posts a certain rate , doesn't mean that is her actual rate ....
do you see where I am going with this ?
Don't believe everything you see and hear .........unless you have SOLID proof .

No need to get all hysterical . People who want to be safe will be safe .  
and those who don't - won't  
Each person should just worry about themselves .

Although I do find it a bit of a paradox when people say -  
OMG I would never see a guy or girl who does BBFS ....... ummmm incase you people are forgetting, if that guy or girl has a husband/wife/So/BF/GF almost everyone is doing BBFS with someone .
and maybe their "someone" is doing BBFS with someone else .
So unless at all times ALL PARTIES are using protection , well then there is always some type of risk.  

Yes BBFS with multiple partners adds higher risk ,  but at the end of the day it only takes ONE person to get an STD.

Another Paradox - When a gent says - OMG I wouldn't see a lady who sees gents,  who see TS's  
ok , first off how close minded it is to imply that a TS doesn't practice safe sex .
Second , you don't know what other gents are doing or not doing .
How does one know he wasn't with a lady who saw a gent who sees TS's ......but the gent just doesn't write about it.

You don't know . So lets not rush to judge people .

This message is in NO WAY advocating for unprotected sex . It takes two to tango.  
So if each party just worries about themselves,  then sex will ALWAYS be safe .

If a gent is offered BBFS , then he has a choice if he wants to be safe - use protection or walk away.
If a lady is asked to provide BBFS and she wants to be safe she can use protection or walk away.

It is plain and simple . I just don't understand why people freak out and get so bent out of shape.

Stay safe and YOU will be safe .
xoxo CindySpice

The only Larry Bird I know is from "The Neighbors " ( TV show , after Last Man Standing )
funny dude LOL LOL LOL LOL  

Sorry not any type of sport fan , although I was born in the US . I was a month old when I left the US and I was raised in countries where lets just say- we had bigger things to worry about then sports.
That's cool , I am glad my life turned out that way . Makes me different . I love different  
So no roots for me to be attached to any particular team .

I get that many people put certain people on a pedestal.
They are their idols , their heros .....they can do no wrong  ( well at least no wrong to what one may perceive as wrong )

At the end of the day even people who are beloved and idolized are human just like anyone else.  
 

Sign,
CindySpice    
   
 

 

I had one Vegas provider (she's no longer working as far as I know) a few years back giving me a spirited BBBJ, when she stopped and mounted me CG uncovered. I stopped her, told her to dismount, handed her a cover and told her to roll it on. She did.

MfSD>>>>

-- Modified on 12/26/2013 10:13:51 AM

Aids in country started in the gay community. Does this answer your question on anal sex?

I wouldn't have seen her again, though

END OF MESSAGE

no it did not start with the gays...ignorance is bliss.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/aids/virus/origins.html

The risk estimates for the sexual transmission of HIV, per sex act, range widely, from 0.5% to 3.38% (with mid-range estimates of 1.4% to 1.69%) for receptive anal intercourse; 0.06% to 0.16% for insertive anal intercourse; 0.08% to 0.19% for receptive vaginal intercourse (i.e., male-to-female); and approximately 0.05% to 0.1% for insertive vaginal intercourse (i.e., female-to-male). The risk of transmission from unprotected oral intercourse (whether penile-oral or vaginal-oral) is markedly lower than for anal or vaginal intercourse, and findings suggest a low but non-zero transmission probability. The risk of transmission to the receptive partner increases with ejaculation and the presence of oral ulcers and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the oropharynx.  

Keep in mind that these risks are if the person you are having sex with has AIDS. Take the percentage of people that have AIDS and multiply it times the risks above. For instance assume that one in ten people you have sex with has AIDS (assuming a VERY high percentage for ease of illustration) Then if you have a  3.38%, it becomes .338% chance of contracting AIDS from any one encounter where you don't know if the person has AIDS or not.

Here's a good way to think about theoretical risk: In theory, it is possible that while walking down the street, a meteor will fall on your head and kill you instantly. This is because meteors do occasionally fall to earth. People live their lives above ground, so there is a theoretical risk of being hit be a meteor. In fact, there have been reports of a few people being hit by meteors. But because the risk is so small, given that few meteors fall to earth and the large number of inhabitants of this planet, the risk is purely theoretical. The same principle holds true with oral sex – millions of people all over the world are believed to engage in unprotected oral sex and there have only been a handful of documented cases of HIV transmission. In turn, fellatio, and other types of oral sex (see below), remains a theoretical risk for HIV infection.

There have been a number of studies that have closely followed MSM and heterosexual couples, in which one partner was HIV positive and the other partner was HIV negative. In all of the studies, couples that used condoms consistently and correctly during every experience of vaginal or anal sex – but didn't use condoms during oral sex – did not see HIV spread from the HIV positive partner to the HIV negative partner.

There have been three case reports and a few studies suggesting that some people have been infected with HIV as a result of unprotected oral sex. However, these case reports and studies all involved MSM – men who were the receptive partners (the person doing the "sucking") during unprotected oral sex with another HIV-positive man. There haven't been any case reports or studies documenting HIV infection among female receptive partners during unprotected oral sex. Even more importantly, there hasn't been a single documented case of HIV transmission to an insertive partner (the person being "sucked") during unprotected oral sex, either among MSM or heterosexuals.

Is insertive oral sex a possible route of HIV transmission? Yes. But is it a documented risk? Absolutely not.

You are wrong.  
1980

    April 24, San Francisco resident Ken Horne, the first AIDS case in the United States to be recognized at the time, is reported to the Center for Disease Control with Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). He was also suffering from Cryptococcus.[11][medical citation needed]
    October 31, French-Canadian flight attendant Gaëtan Dugas pays his first known visit to New York City bathhouses. He would later be deemed "Patient Zero" for his apparent connection to many early cases of AIDS in the United States.

Unless New York City bathhouses are were "straights" go. Not putting the gays down. All of us, straights and gays, are horny and back them who knew you were at risk for something like AIDS?