I have always felt vegas girls are absolutely drop dead gorgeous which explains why I visit every now and then.  

However,  I felt the top 100 list for Vegas is more strangely ordered than I expected.  With the exception of a few ladies and without naming names, I felt a number of the ladies from second tier or third thier should really be in the top ten in terms of looks. Of course, every guy will feel differently about this but I also am a bit curious about what the deal is.  Do Vegas guys feel that there's a lot of review manipulation going on in order to be placed at the top?  Where I'm from several girls are notorious for this but I'd like some PM from anyone about the scoop here

Certain services get certain scores.Some of the ladies on the list I know personally have worked very hard to make it to TER 100 and havent manipulated anyone to make it to the list.I do know in some cities manipulation does happen.

There's as much or maybe more manipulation going. So let's not bury our head in the sand. Not saying all are skewed so let's not get crazy with this shit. You just need to read between the lines and do your homework, that's all.

I wonder that too...
Also why Natasha Lemans not in the top 100 anymore?

... from which you can make a decision as to who you want to see.
It is simply not possible to make a completely objective ranking that is based entirely on subjective data.

In other words, one mans Goddess is another mans bitch.

Unless you get your jollies by seeing top 10 providers.  There are plenty of up and cummers with less than the 20 review minimum.  

I guess it proves that TER rankings are not weighted accurately.  
Or did she unlist herself from the top 100?

I know that if you are not getting new reviews for a long period of time, TER will cross you out of top 100 list.

I think it works fine, as it is.

Every guy has different ratings and feelings for a lady.

Thankfully peoples tastes, needs and desires are all different. If every guy wanted the same lady then there would be no variety or competition.

There can be some review manipulation - but TER has specific rules for posting a review (i.e. you cannot post a review on the same lady within 3 months). I think they do what they can to avoid any "large scale" manipulation by ladies or gents.

The best part about Vegas is the variety.....whatever your desires and needs you CAN find it in Vegas and the ladies are usually more accessible than other cities.

I am probably a little different than most (single, mid 40's, no family) - but anyone can have a good time in vegas at ANY hour of the day.  

New York has nothing over Vegas, Vegas is the city that never sleeps.....AND the beautiful, wonderful providers of Vegas will make sure you DO NOT sleep AND have an awesome time doing it

TER doesnt rate girls simply based off of their looks. Its a combined effort between their looks and performance.
But even if they did, the issue would still be subjective to everyones own personal taste.  
Your choices of who should be on the "top 10", isnt going to be the same as eveyones elses.
And vice versa.

Just the fact that "they work very hard to be in the list" sound like they hassle for high ratings. What do you care if you make it there or not? There are plenty of girls with less than 20 who are great. I am wary of those who amass 20 reviews in a very short time like those $600 girls that came out recently and have reviews from same reviewers.

END OF MESSAGE