who is using FAKE photos to begin with.

Just noticed a new and unusually low review of Scarlet Suzuki.

I've never seen her, but this seems a real outlier.  Granted there are always bad days--but as someone who has her as a Favorite for the future, I'm wondering if the review is legit.

It almost reads like a "revenge" review.

How is Scarlet these days?

I just read that review before I saw this post and I thought the same thing.  It is the only review by that reviewer if that means anything.  I can't believe how much this review is such a contrast to all those other reviewers of Scarlett.

1. Is the recent poor review written by someone who has a personal vendetta against Scarlet ?

2. Or, is it possible, that the rest of the reviewers are guilty of "score inflation" in regards to appearance ?

3. And ( as Mr_Perfect ) implies, are the photos on her website fake ?

All this could be resolved if Scarlet & her reviwers speak out on this thread. Hell----I was interested in seeing her myself.

See the link.

Did you notice that 9 out of the 10 reviewers on page 1, all have written multiple reviews. The only reviewer with one review on page 1 , was this one new outlier poor review. BTW, I was to lazy to look at page 2

She is a little older than her profile age and the pictures would imply, but only slightly. She is definitely a woman with near professional quality makeup, and with her hair up she does look a little different from those pictures.

       But I suspect that the youthful reviewer was expecting a young Asian girl and that led him to overreact. Scarlett is an elegant and attractive Asian woman who also happens to be a whiz at programing I-phones.

I met Scarlet in May.  She is tall for being of Japanese descent and she is somewhat heavier than the pictures but nothing I would consider overweight.  She was an excellent provider, delivered as expected and I would see her again.  She does not have a super model facial appearance but how many really do.  I doubt many guys would kick her out of bed for eating crackers.  I didn't write a review because she made me a promise I hope to collect.  When that happens I will write her review.  If you want a natural provider that has excellent skills, and is polite as they come, you could do a lot worse.

I saw her about a week ago.  She was fun and very, very energetic, however, the photos are (very) fake, and frankly give an entirely different impression as to what you're getting.  IMO she should update them with either real pics or pics that are a bit more realistic.  She's a lot heavier, older, and a much different body shape.

The only complaint I had about her performance is I think she was a bit tipsy, but that really just made her more fun.  Her looks threw me off but her performance made up for it.  YMMV.

If not, you should, mentioning what you just told us here.

"slightly" older. A "little different"
The reviewer "overreacted".

She's older, fatter and using fake pics.
You can white knight all you want marikod. We expect it from you.

should have more time to work on your reading comprehension problem.

       On yes, the ladies in this industry just love being described as “older” and “not looking like their pictures.” This is the shilling of their dreams. In fact, I am currently taking shill requests from any lady in Vegas who would like me to describe her as “older” and “not looking like her pictures."

       So, of all the shills Scarlett might have received, I don’t know that she will particularly treasure this one, although I think my post gives some context to the issues raised by the OP.

      But in fairness, Mr. Perfect, I’ll extend the same shill to you – I think you are a lot older than you sound, and your post was far from perfect. And I’ll even add that your courage
in trashing this lady under an alias is especially commendable.

      Back to Shilling 101 for you.

While visiting in June, I was hoping to see someone, but the schedule never worked out.  I did research, though, and I agree with mr. perfect that the first picture does have some tineye hits.  However, what you won't find on tineye is the other pics.  During my investigation, tineye went down for a moment, so i used an alternative - i think it was Gazopa  It did find the other pictures.  They were of a Laotian model from some 2007 photo shoot.  With gazopa being down, I can't prove it; and I realize I don't have much pull around here - but this new review and some of the things that have come up do make one think twice.  Personally, I'm sure she's a great provider; but I like to know what I'm getting.  That's why I've never booked a session with a provider who blurs her face...

oh, and if you're bored, google "honey lee" and you should find some familiar images that were used by another provider...

I checked, double checked, and re-checked to make sure that I didn't miss it. Sixteen posts so far and not one link to her reviews.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?ID=157968