Is it fair for me to dismiss girls who don't have a website? It seems that all girls who have a website, have great reviews, and so far, I can't find any girls without a website, that have ANY reviews. Do I just not know what I'm talking about, or is it a good rule of thumb to just stick with professionals who have gone to the trouble/expense, and it's probably paying off? If I rule out girls without websites (many on Eros), that is a huge percentage of available women.
I've seen a number of escorts without web sites. Obviously ladies who are UTR don't have web sites and some providers prefer to keep a low profile and may only be on P411. In addition, new providers who are just starting in the business, many times with the help of a friend already escorting, don't have a site.
Your statement, "all girls who have web sites, have great reviews" is pretty broad, and I would not assume a web site means a good time. As far as Eros is concerned, it's simply an escort mall, a site that escorts advertise on. You'll need to do a lot more research before you decide to see a provider from Eros or any escort mall.
Posted By: sidd2
Is it fair for me to dismiss girls who don't have a website? It seems that all girls who have a website, have great reviews, and so far, I can't find any girls without a website, that have ANY reviews. Do I just not know what I'm talking about, or is it a good rule of thumb to just stick with professionals who have gone to the trouble/expense, and it's probably paying off? If I rule out girls without websites (many on Eros), that is a huge percentage of available women.
I would be more careful using Eros or other ad boards as they contain many scams. A website shows commitment to the business but it is not the only thing. Look at reviews, obviously. Look at the history of reviews. If you see large gaps, this may be an indication of an issue. Always best to ask as some ladies just take some time off. Look if they have partnered with other reputable ladies. Ladies tend to double up with people that are reliable and trustworthy. Don't be afraid to PM some previous reviewers. We are often more candid in private.
If you don't want to see someone with no website you're welcome to pass! The great thing about this industry is the choice is yours!
Posted By: sidd2
Is it fair for me to dismiss girls who don't have a website? It seems that all girls who have a website, have great reviews, and so far, I can't find any girls without a website, that have ANY reviews. Do I just not know what I'm talking about, or is it a good rule of thumb to just stick with professionals who have gone to the trouble/expense, and it's probably paying off? If I rule out girls without websites (many on Eros), that is a huge percentage of available women.
Your statement abut all girsl with websites have great reviews is pretty broad, and it is false. There are ladies with websites who have no reviews, or bad reviews, and there are ladies without websites who have good reviews. A website is good to have, and as others have said, with all the free sites out there, there is not much reason for a provider to not have one. However as a hobbyist, it is much more important to look for reviews than to look for a website.
What possible reason is there not to have a website, except if it's an agency girl? AND GoDaddy doesn't have problems w/ the adult biz, unlike so many other vendors.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
