6 ladies.  All ladies have EXACT websites, well, OK, web pages.  Two of the 6 are centered rather than left aligned and one has a black background.  I guess the agency decided to get creative LOL.

ALL the photos are very similar and taken in or around the M Resort.  All photos have almost exact text on them.  All the websites are identical, minus the name and photos.  It has three lines, Name, E-mail, Tag line, TER badge and then photos.  All the websites also at .webs.com except Monica.  

None of the ladies have numbers, just email.  Only two share similar emails, once again I think the agency got creative again and figure if they all didn't use @live.com then it would draw less attention.

But am I really the only person who thinks these girls are part of an agency rather than REALLY independent??  I smell bullshit agency trying to cover up and they aren't doing a good job.  The girls I am sure are real and really hot, but I think trying to play independent and actually being an agency is BS.

Monica
http://www.monicamalone.com/index2.html

Daisy
http://daisyvegas.webs.com/index2.html

Arianna Rose
http://arose702.webs.com/

Rachel Winters
http://rachelwinters.webs.com/

Naughty Madison
http://msnaughtymadison.webs.com/

Naomi Ryan
http://naomiryan702.webs.com/


-- Modified on 10/29/2009 3:41:57 AM

Lena Jolie
http://www.lenajolie.com/

And if you look at these ladies reviews, there are several guys who have reviewed ONLY these ladies.

**Scratching forehead**

-- Modified on 10/26/2009 12:23:14 PM

-- Modified on 10/29/2009 3:42:26 AM

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=87632&boardID=3&page=

And this site has the similar text and email as the other ladies.

http://www.velvetcompanions.com/home.html#

-- Modified on 10/29/2009 3:42:49 AM

you are the only one posting valuable hobbyist information and doing so with an alias. I mean please, providing a great public service needs to be done under the cover of darkness?

Now, since you called them out, and that is not a problem, in all fairness we should allow the readers here know that most all of them have a TER profile and reviews, which I include herein. I report - You decide.

Monica
http://www.monicamalone.com/index2.html
Her TER profile:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=132894
Only one person there I know is a friend of mine from DC, who gave her an 8/5

Daisy
http://daisyvegas.webs.com/index2.html
Her TER profile:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=135837
At least one person there reviewed both Monica and Daisy favorable (DirectorVision).

Arianna Rose
http://arose702.webs.com/
Her TER profile:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=137877
I don’t recognize any reviewers there. This does not automatically mean non-legit either.

Rachel Winters
http://rachelwinters.webs.com/
Did not see a TER profile yet.

Naughty Madison
http://msnaughtymadison.webs.com/
Her TER profile:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=139681
Nothing stands out here other than the one reviewer also reviewed this girl Lena Jolie.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?ID=133322
The kicker here is Lena was reviewed by one of our own 1QualitySeeker. I’m not sure I want to call him out on this one, do you?

Naomi Ryan
http://naomiryan702.webs.com/
Her TER profile:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=139846
One reviewer of her and he has eight reviews to his tally board.

There’s nothing too conclusive here, but clearly needs continued watching to see what muddles forth out of the river. I suspect someone will get burned sooner or later. Would I see any of them? No

I am doubting that they are independents.  And I am a provider who doesn't want to be called catty or hateful, which is the purpose of my alias

-- Modified on 10/29/2009 3:43:13 AM

Anyone remember the nonsense with Vegas and Skinny Liz some months ago?

Yeah, I could completely see why you wouldn't want to be associated with outing what appears to be an agency that advertises their escorts as independents.

BTW, some of the photography style does remind me of the LVSE/Vegas/Liz days. Ah, well, plus la change, plus la même chose.

Alexis Vixen
http://alexisvixen.webs.com/

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=136038

Bostonsnatchface reviewed her and Monica


-- Modified on 10/29/2009 3:43:36 AM

I'd hate to think that the alias is to protect a provider from not appearing jealous of hot young things with lower rates.

Just sayin.

Those damn reviewers that have only reviewed the above mentioned girls is a HUGE turn off.

She only has two reviews from "veterans", LV57Guy & TDOG19703 (who is whitleisted by Nikki Avalon).  I stick to independents only, so I can't pull the trigger on this one.

Obviously there is something fishy going on.  If all the girls have similar websites, and reviewed by same guy than it's definitely something to look into further.
This site is geared to help hobbyist find legit, honest girls, who continue to make this hobby fun like it should be.  
If these ladies are not honest, than I wouldn't want any gents to be taken advantage of neither.  I appreciate the heads up, and men beware.  It could be a scam!!

So am I lol.  I just hate when people are being deceitful.  They say you get what you pay for.  And I know with my 120+ reviews, I have nothing to worry about  

I think the ladies are beautiful, and at $300 an hour minus ohhhh 30-40% for agency fee, they are more than selling themselves short.  They could easily be $4-500 without giving an agency anything.

I just think it's fair to everyone to know if they are or are not an agency.  But you can have your opinion, just like I have mine  

-- Modified on 10/29/2009 3:44:04 AM

So it does seem like a many reviewers reviewed more than one of these girls.  Some of the reviewers have a pretty extensive list of reviews. It might make sense that someone who is attracted to one of these girls, might be attracted the others.  (I for one am)

Do you really think that this is completely a conspiracy or a case of these girls being less than affiliated and trying to pad their reviews?

I know of someone that got burned by monica

but of course that would be a board violation wouldn't it?

Oh... just a tip anyway. Break up your writing style a little with each successive post. It sort of gives ya up ya know what I mean? lol

in fact it is no story without some facts. Care to elaborate? Or is this just another teaser? lol

we are not that brainless.

And you being a wise and savvy board poster no better than to post with two user names on a single thread, so NO it is not use. We'll keep it a secret though, k

I don't want people to think I need to hide behind an alias to call someone out.  And I intentionally had posted under my real username in hopes that RCPro would flip my Ismelltuna alias

Because I got a PM from that person regarding Rob at 100proof.  I had to PM this person back and let them know that Monica was pulling the wool over their eyes because Zack and Rob are completely different people.

I think Monica may have had a fallen out with her agency and ran to someone she knew would defend her.  Although I have told him he might not have the whole story as it isn't unlikely she would keep some things quiet.

A couple other sites stated in our exchange were westcoast elite and sin city elite.

I've have seen most of them and they are all good and the reviews are all real.  Agencies might have a bad rap in this town but I do like this one.  The only one I have not seen but would like to is Lena Jolie but then she does not go to houses!!

Are they part of an agency?  Do you know that, or are you guessing?

Oh, and where are your reviews of them?

having been doing reviews lately but I do think I have one for Monica.  I am guessing; but then they seem to know me when I ask for someone different....

Re: LOL I'm not hidding that much. Most know who I am already (eom)

I've been wondering about this for some time also...

Good job on the super sleuthing...wonder what kind of responses will be made?

It seems if you are being legit and up front, you'd want to stand up for yourself.

A lot of these ladies have been called out a couple/few times, and said nothing....

Is it because it's true?  hmmmmm

I agree!  Super lame to say you're independent, when clearly you are not!

Can anyone get the facts from Quality Seeker?

i was part of a thread awhile ago where Monica was posting as "Cora Summers" on CL as well...

interesting that Daisy Vegas is now posting at 500/hr below too...

I am very offended that my name was brought up in this mess. I think I have been around long enough to be beyond this. I am real and I am 100% independent.

Tasha why wouldn't you just email me yourself and ask me? Why would you write this hateful post rather than coming to me and meeting me in person? We are both grown women and should be able to handle things like adults. It seems a bit immature. Maybe its a cry for attention.


Lena Jolie

[email protected]

P.S. 1QualitySeeker can you help me out here?

.....she's had enough bad Agency experience in the past and working on being independent.

Not trying to take away from your post though,
Tuna


Had a drink,....makes me want to say Tuna in the Tight Dress.......
.....and, very Hot!

considering that when i lasst went to vegas and was visited by arianna rose it kinda felt a little mechanical and something did not seem right you may be correct and they may all be a part of an agency

......some in reserve!

Always!

I am completely independent and work independently. I think it is very odd that another escort is the one bringing this up rather than any of the guys. Tasha, maybe you have an green eyed monster growing inside of you.

is that all are email contact only.  No phone.  Nothing wrong with that...just that it's a commonality of the ladies being discussed.

Oh, and I sorta like tuna; aa long as it has a little Green Chile in it.

...that lists a rate of 400 per hour.  She used to advertise 300 per hour, but the raise occurred when her new photos came out.  I can understand, those photos are damn hot!!  

These girls (and their marketing tactics) were a hot topic of discussion at the last meet and greet.  There was a concensus that these girls must be from an agency, although nobody there had any first hand experience with them.

I have a site that looks exactly like theirs, and I am an independent. I do not see how having a simple site equals affiliation with an agency.

I think they offer that at UNLV now. That would explain everything - they were all taught the same marketing method, and why they all burst onto the scene at the same time. It would even explain why they all do CBJ's. If this is the case, they could all easily be independent.

All asking the same thing using word for word damn near what Lena Jolie wrote in this post LOL.  I suppose that is just another coincidence??  Why didn't I contact them first and ask??  Well lets see her, because chances are I'm not speaking with the ladies maybe???  Yeah I think that is the reason.  

Lack of originality.  It will lower your grade every time.

Zack, if their reviews qualify as gfe in your corral, we may need to re-define the term. I know this is a hot topic of conversation with some providers here, including some on this thread, but in mho, a true gfe in not a cbj.

Out, love and peace and may all of us have lots of great fun!!!

Tasha, is your business really that slow that you have the time to research everyone on TER, and then sit in front of your computer all day long replying on this thread?
Honestly, I think you are a shady person. I think you are just upset because you have to share the spotlight.  

Ms Naughty Madison
[email protected]
http://msnaughtymadison.webs.com/

People were noticing some things back months ago that didn't quite add up- like ladies who were allegedly independent but working for an agency, but only for "bachelor parties"

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=87709&boardID=3

When a lot of those ladies are working for that agency AND they all have kinda similar photography and websites, plus there's almost no interaction with the community outside of hit-and-run ads.... and you find some reviewers who seem to specialize in reviewing the same ladies... well, a lot of us who live in or come to Vegas were born at night, but we weren't born last night. We've seen this "agency pretends to be a bunch of independents" game before, along with sincere protestations from ladies swearing up and down that this isn't true.

Guess we will see how it plays out. Pretty hard to fool people for too long.

I know that Arianna and Monica(ATF)and also Jessica; they give wonderful service and are great!  I've met Tasha at a M&G and she is a wonderful person but too expensive for poor little me I am waiting for a special...

They all give great service; and I always thought that they were part of an agency; but if they are independent so well and good.  There is enough BS on the adverts sites that when I see that type of advert and website I feel good about calling them!!  

A note to all the girls mentioned here: THANK YOU.  Thank you for making this hobby wonderful experience.  God; I have had bad ones.

I would have thought you would have heard from all eight. Clearly, speaking of fish, there appears to be something rotten in Denmark, or at least, disingenuous marketing.

Speaking of Europe, Finland in the first country in our world that now guarantee's all citizens a public right to have access to broad band internet access. Talk about a public option!!!

Cudo's to you for sniffing it out. Although the jury is still out, isn't it great that we can all express our views on this board. RC, are you still here???  LOL!

I hope my views on cbj's don't preclude my future invitations to future m&g's.  )

I counted 7.Who is the 8th one?Alexis Vixen?

124 reviews dating back to October of 2003.  Organizer and hostess of several parties where we in the community get together and have fun.  Makes no secret of starting in the business under a different name and with a "booking agent," but becoming completely independent soon thereafter.  One of the most active participants here on the Las Vegas discussion board.  Helps other independent providers with such things as their web sites.

That's all I'm going to do, state facts.  They speak for themselves.  

Some people don't want to patronize an agency in Vegas; some people consider lying about being involved with an agency (or having "management") to be unethical and thus not a way they want to spend their cash.

And you're right, some people don't care, and just want to get laid. But it does not surprise me that agencies go to great lengths to hide their affiliations in Vegas, given the lousy reputation most of them have- but hiding it's kind of deceitful.

For those that are unaware, the board moderator has access to IP Address information.  There is a great deal of similarity in the addresses of the ladies in question.

With that, this thread is now closed.  Any further posting will be at your peril.



-- Modified on 10/26/2009 8:57:04 PM

not hot, or anything negative directly about THEM.  I am only bringing to everyone's attention what I found.  Should I be wrong I'd be more than happy to apologize.  I just don't think I am.

I was 18-19 once.  As many here know I started out as an "independent" who went by the name of Hailey.  8 pages of reviews later, and a falling out with my booker/agency, I did go independent.

I spent 5 months trying to not only convince people that I was in fact the same lady that everyone had known as Hailey, but 5 months of trying to rebuild a reputation I ruined by leaving my booker/agency.  

I know what it's like being 18-19 and wanting to have all the fun in the world and just wait for someone to call me and tell me to go to this hotel to see this person for this amount of time.  It was great not to worry about screening, answering phone calls, keeping track of everything.  

But then I started feeling guilty for lying to my clients.  I started to argue with my booker which in return made her give my appts to other ladies she was booking for.  And when I did go independent, I was frowned upon because I had lied and deceived people.  Was I right?  Nope.  People don't care if you work for an agency or have a booker as long as you deliver as promised and don't rob them.

Had I known that then, I would've been honest about it.  It sure as hell would've saved me 5 months of board arguments.  

I would bet each and every single lady I mentioned are real.  I would also be willing to bet they offer the service stated in their reviews.  I personally think all of them are beautiful ladies.  I just don't think it's right to lie and deceive people who are spending their hard earned money on ladies.

I didn't post this because I am afraid of competition either.  Anyone who knows me, knows I am the first lady to try to help another lady.  Anyone who knows me, knows I welcome competition.  And in all honesty, I don't look at this business AS a competition.  I love what I do, I love meeting new people, men and women alike, and in my opinion not only are there enough clients to go around, but this hobby is about selection and variety

I realize that this thread is probably long dead, but I did visit Vegas recently and decided to visit a couple of these girls.  During the emails I noticed that the IP addresses of the PC sending the replies are the same.  They were all sent by the same computer.  I visited Monica Malone and another girl not on the above list that had the same address.  Monica was very much real and even though she wasn't quite as intense as her reviews state, her pics were accurate and she was a great date!  I will post reviews shortly.