TER performance reviews are weighted.

The best performance score any lady can get is "7", unless extra points are earned by doing extra things ie: really bi, anal, more than one guy, BBBJ, etc. with one more point allowed for each extra thing performed.

So the reviewer could have given a "10" in performance, but if said CBJ, and just multiple positions, TER would adjust the score down to the resulting "7".

If the reviewer gave a "10" and specified BBBJ, then the score would be adjusted down to an "8", BBBJ, and DFK would get a "9", BBBJ, DFK, and really bi would get a "10".

To add to the general wierdness of this, I believe whereas score will be adjusted down, they are not conversely adjusted up...so a lady that gets a "6" and does BBBJ, DFK, and really bi still only gets a "6"...

So, in theory, someone could submit a fake review, give a "10" for performance, but have TER adjust it to a "7".

This has always confused me a bit, because if a prospective client isn't looking for Greek, or BBBJ, or DFK, or any of the other weighted things, and he finds a lady that offers what he wants...the best score she can have for performance is a "7", but how can he then know if she got a "7" becaues she was really only a "7" in performance, of was she a "10" but it got adjusted to a "7".  Seems to me the wieghting of the scores actually muddies the waters for acurate scores by services offered.

WebT's interpretation is correct, however I just don't know how that is consistently applied across the board by the various moderators.  My thoughts on the 7's are that its not too  high to draw attention.  Its funny that its 7s or 10s. Even the best providers who are consistently high range 8-10.  You are able to discern a low given score as they simply didn't click or was having a bad day.  But only 7's and 10's has got me wondering.

Can we trust you Smarty???

You have already admitted to good grammar, AND you have numbers on your ID.  Guilty, I say!  Hang the man, and leave me his hobby money.