Has anyone else noticed that a lot of the Los Angeles K-Girl providers have reviewers that only write reviews of K-Girl providers and some of these reviewers have 20+ K-Girl reviews a month?  K-Girl providers seem to have taken over the LA review section for the past several months and I'm beginning to think a lot of the reviews are fake - all great from reviewers that only review K-girls and review a large number each month.  The numbers just don't add up.

As is the case with all providers, K-Girls notwithstanding. It's hard to say if the percentage is any different, but you also have to consider that there are a block of hobbyists that see only K-Girls and that alone doesn't arouse any suspicion. For the most part, the scores seem to be in line with the performances in the juicy details.  

I do think that the grade inflation is less prevalent with the K-Girls because they tend to be pretty and keep themselves in good shape. I have never seen a K-Girl that I would rate less then a 7 on a bad day.  

The numbers do add up. If I wasn't on a review strike, I would have posted two new K-Girl reviews today and both would have been 9/9's.  

BTW, if you have a legitimate reason to report a fake review, please do so. If it's just a guess because you can't make the #'s match in your head, see paragraph one.

of course they are fake
the bosses use and make up accounts so they can add reviews
You cant go by the reviews!
They are fake!
I think we should boycott!!
and let these bosses loose money for a least a month or tw

"Nothing is more terrible than to see ignorance in action"  
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Are you just ignorant or malicious ? Are  you intent to publicly use TER's board to discredit TER  , its reviews and its reviewers. Are you working for the competition whose  review database is made up of K-dolls reviews already already published on TER ? Why didn't you post the truth on their site ?

 You are  accusing TER  of lacking quality control, by  simply allowing any fake and fraudulent reviews to be published like a bush league review board.  

Maybe you have it for the K-dolls or jealous of those who can enjoy their favorite providers on almost daily basis. Through K-dolls we mutually see I know of two high volume TER reviewers who see exclusively K-dolls every day, who I suspect you are referring to. Sorry mate they are genuine.  

What is your agenda ?  As far as hobbying some guys hobby almost or even everyday. Some review some don't. Don't judge others by your own  limitations  . Some even hobby twice a day , all it takes is cash , some people work hard , earn enough money  and enjoy spending it. Who are you to judge ? You may not afford but others can.

Some  hobbyist see exclusively Asians , some  see African American or whites , Latinos or Koreans who cares as long as they are seeing whom they please. Some review the providers other don't.

If you were half aware you'd have realized the K-dolls have for a few years been the dominant force in the LA Hobby scene. Use the LA DB search engine and look up the relevant terms- it may help catch up with what you missed.

 As far as taking over the Review section where have you been hiding all these years ? Otherwise with their dominance  you would have noticed that ,  other than for a 6 months period at end of '12and start  '13 the K- dolls have taken over the review section several years  and not months ago .

Do you wish for TER to deny posting legitimate reviews because you don't wish for TER to add to  their  valuable Reviews  data base,  or are you envious of the guys who would be rewarded for reviews with VIP days or do you hold malice towards the K-dolls and fear reviews will help them earn a living they work extremely hard for.  

You must realize that TER take due diligence to insure that the integrity and quality of their reviews is recognized as the most reliable.  

 "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."(John Adams) .

Let us have some truth. What is your agenda? Whom do you represent ?  

 
 

that your reviews are fake ? Why should I trust you and not others. Based on whom you have reviewed and incidentally given high scores to I would suggest you are a newbie who has not been able to pass careening of the top bookers and your call for boycott and  baseless accusations is a form of retaliation . Let me tell you something for nothing ....you will not have to worry about dealing with the bookers or those K-dolls you wish to boycott.

...reviews of K-girls because they only see K-girls.  It's not complicated, nor is it some grand conspiracy.

Please provide a link to the reviews of guys who write 20+ reviews a month.  Frankly, I don't believe that.  Even the legendary Reviewer never had 20 reviews in a month.

There was a lull in K-girl reviews for a few months (everyone knows why) but now they're back to what they were before.  No more, no less.

The reason there are so many reviews of K-girls is that they are high volume providers.  While a non K-girl may see one or two guys a day, a K-girl can see up to 11 guys a day so she will potentially have the possibility of 11 guys writing reviews vs. one or two guys writing reviews for non K-girls.  That's why K-girls get more reviews in the L.A. reviews.

There's not a greater incidence of fake K-reviews than of TER reviews in general.  I once saw a review of a K-girl by a guy who wrote only reviews of K-girls.  He had written the EXACT SAME review, word for word, of a different K-girl a year before and he just changed the name.  Maybe it was laziness, not a fake review, but I've seen that in the non K-reviews as well

"You must realize that TER take due diligence to insure that the integrity and quality of their reviews is recognized as the most reliable."

TER relies in no small part on hobbyists to report problems in reviews and profiles to insure their integrity and reliability.

You knew Rani/Lani and Eri were the same provider but you allowed them to have separate profiles and separate reviews for a year and a half without reporting it.  What a joke it is for you to crow about the integrity and quality of TER when you do nothing to contribute to said integrity and quality.

Ref the thread in LA per Pepsi/Yoona.

The bbfs reviews are old news and are sketchy.  They are a couple weeks old.  I cant believe they made it past the screeners.  But I didnt personally write a problem report because I didnt have my vip at the time.

After getting my vip back, and heeding your call to expose sketchy reviews I reported the most recent review of pepsi 9/10 as being suspicious (check the reviewers 4 or 5 posts from the handle's short history).
The ter response was that she qualified for the 10 in service because of her profile.

How can you claim that harpman hasnt submitted problem reports?  Sure would be nice if my problem reports would help keep my vip status up.  I bet there are a lot of us that submitt reports and nothing gets corrected or checked out.

Maybe you can be our problem report integrity champion to make sure ter follows through?

I'd like to see proof to back up your accusation that harpman is not submitting problem reports?

-- Modified on 8/13/2013 8:51:45 AM

there ya go
another example of what this country is made of
free press and opinions

there is fact behind that statement
and you know it

to be removed from the blog because i state my opinion only shows a nazism of control
glad to be removed from it
only changed names to reapply  
glad it didnt work

tell the leaders of this country from thomas jefferson to martin luther king
tell them not to express what they feel

obviously you live from a confined child hood, glad there are people like you,
so sad, and depressing,