So I kinda assumed that the providers here are GFE only unless stated in their profile there are upcharges for bbfs. However if I read the 'about us' more carefully it actually just says YMMV with all of them, correct? Because I've read some reviews about providers who I thought was GFE only but actually offered bbfs. Just wanted to make sure I understand, since I don't think I can ask the PO to clarify.
YMMV of YEMV is something you can just never assume will fall in your direction. Everybody is different. Girls respond differently to different people. They have good days and bad days.
For me, I try not to spend time thinking about the services and skills ticked off within the first visit. I look for attitude and chemistry. If attitude and chemistry aren’t a good fit, it is most likely that the services will also be lacking no matter what I do. If the attitude and chemistry feel good, you can feel the girl out on service level later. The less experienced the girl the more this applies. Girls, whether more or less experienced, who have reviews with a broader variability in scores - what I call high YMMV girls - might or might not take more time before you get their best service. Though, for me, these are frequently my favorite girls. As with all things in the mongering world, with all of this your experience may vary.
I'm not one to follow this org but I am approved; booker knows me. With this org, none of the kgirls offer bbfs. Let me repeat --) at this org none of the kgirls offer bbfs. One of my faves, May, did a tour with this org and booker told me not to expect bbfs. There you go bro. There are plenty of orgs where you can get bbfs. Read the reviews and look at the ads that offer up 'PSE'. I'd be more specific but the kgirl admin has a hard on to bump my posts as 'shilling'. YMMV refers to the kgirl's option to reject you at the door or impose 'rules' on you. Don't worry --) most of these Kgirls will service Quasimodo for $280 / hour donation. YEMV
Jamie at GFEI offers bbfs (with cip) with upcharge. And its explicitly stated here:
http://www.gfeinvestments.ch/jamie/ Many other girls were ymmv and it all depended on what girls thought of you. The org was very against mongers demanding BB by default tho, and I can understand it. I've gotten a couple girls there offer me bare, but not even every session by those girls. I wont name them for obvious reasons.
Don’t worry too much about possibly getting this one wrong. It is also possibly that the quoted review is wrong (it is unfortunately common for mongers to embellish the truth in a review - or just to be a case of mistaken memory).
The girls who truly never go bare are not the norm as much as they used to be, sadly. But there are current girls who are very diligent about being strictly GFE. I won’t name any as I don’t want to get this post blocked as a shill post.
And none of us get to decide how to implement them.
I’ve had recent posts blocked. One because I tried to create a thread to discuss places to go girl watching. Just girl watching. I had another blocked because I named a few girls that I thought fit the category of the thread. Oddly, I’ve seen others do the same with impunity. But my post wasn’t allowed. So, I don’t create posts with specific locations or names of specific girls or orgs. Because I was told, and it has been demonstrated to me, that my posts are likely to be blocked if I do. If you’re one of those who can post that kind of info without getting it pulled, go for it.
A better assumption to make is that they all offer it to someone and act accordingly
I believe he’s recommending that assumption for safety’s sake. If you’re interested in BBFS, stick with providers that are reviewed as such. If you’re trying to avoid the BB girls, stick with providers that are advertised and reviewed as GFE only.
Assume all kgirls give it up raw to someone. However accept that that someone may not be you. How does the joke go?: Whats the difference between a slut and a bitch? A slut will fuck everyone. A bitch will fuck everyone but YOU. Jokes aside, this is common. They are fucking their favorites in the incall or off the clock bare. Maybe consistently. Maybe not. Unless you are that guy all you can do is speculate. There are scumbags who lie about services rendered for clout I assume (never understood The hottest Kgirl Ive ever known, everyone swore up and down she NEVER did BB. Never say never in this game. She did BB with several faves and of course her sugardaddy. Similarly another hot provider I was strictly advertised as CFS yet some regulars got BB and a totally different experience than what I experienced. Its just part of the game. Don’t let the title of the org fool you because two of the girls there are BB queens but only one advertises and upcharges for the privilege. Haven’t seen any intel on other GFEI ladies offering or providing BB but that doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened. As their disclaimer suggests: YEMV. At any rate enjoy.
Nowadays BBFS is as plentiful as sand on the beach. Most if not all who offer it will allow it for everyone but remember one thing that there is always that thing lurking in the corner and that thing is YMMV.
Don't be fooled by the rules. Over the years when BBFS was not as prevalent many agencies had "rules" for the girls not to do it. That said BBFS has been going on for years. In the past it was UTR and now it's in the open. I can't tell you how often I had BBFS in spite of the "rules". If we didn't have rule breakers there would be no need for rules.
STARTING a thread about a specific girl is shilling, and can only be done on Friday on your regional board, and you must have a review of the girl up within 72 hours, or the post is removed. With that said, the mods have let some of Twoons go on this board, but when no review is forthcoming within the 72 hours, they are removed. Hopefully, he'll figure it out, so he doesn't lose any more posts.
On the other hand, if the OP is an ISO post, then it's okay for others to name names of individual girls in response to the OP's inquiry. This is not considered shilling.
For the Shill Friday posts the requirement is that the post include a link to the lady's profile. The exception to that rule is that the post can be made without a link to the profile IF a review will be submitted within the 72 hours. In other words, it seem TER treats Shill Friday posts of new ladies as a mini review situation, but if the woman already has a profile here then no additional review is needed to make the Friday post.
The point of the link to the profile is a bit of a check and balance for those reading the post I suspect.
I've never posted a Friday shill myself, so I had forgotten about adding the link in lieu of a forthcoming review. My bad. It's still supposed to be on the regional boards, though, and not here on the Kgirl board. I think that may be why he had some removed. It might depend on who the mod is whether it can stay here or not. If makes sense to do Kgirl shills here on Fridays because THIS is where the Kgirl customers are.
Agreed on the point about this being an appropriate board for Friday shill posts for K-Girls rather than the local regional board (though at times that does make sense too -- e.g., a non-touring local provider). Probably a challenge for consistency if there are not a consistent set of moderators. But I have a hard time thinking that TER has 100s of people (or even 10s) taking turns checking the posts.
I think the big distinction here is probably more that Friday shill posts are not mini reviews, and should not be including much if any of the details one would put in either the review or the mini review. If that take on these types of posts is correct then some of the posting problems some have had might related to that -- just being careful of content and what should be in a review rather than a board post would solve a lot of the rejections.
There is a fine line between offering it and accepting it. If, in the midst of your coital endeavor you treat it like you would a civvie girl you would be surprised at the acceptance rate. Do you say to a civvie girl "May I fuck you BBFS"? Of course not. You engage in your sexual activity and it happens naturally or it doesn't. Get a girl hot enough and more often than not, in my experience, the door to heaven opens up to a bare entry. That has been in spite of the "rules" that primarily existed going back ten years and to some extent today. You would be surprised at those girls who are discussed on these boards as no BBFS and how many of them have accepted it UTR. YMMV.
"just go for it and stick it in" policy that has gotten you banned by several Kgirls and also from some boards for advocating rape.
You should tell the whole story about how you represent yourself as a marketing genius and connected Kgirl impresario and will get them more business if they give YOU BBFS. Many have fallen for it, only to rue the day. Then there was the LAKS scam you ran where you would tell girls that if they gave you, harpman and tomcat BBFS, you would make them "Kgirl of the Month." Of course, there was always a few months delay in getting their name up as Girl of the Month in which they had to remain BBFS compliant with you and your cronies. What they didn't realize is that you were posting on the private message board to your members that the girl is BBFS with everyone. They got plenty of customers alright, but ended up blocking them, and then changing their names or else leaving SoCal. Your "get a girl hot enough and it just happens naturally" suggestion is hardly what your history shows. You're just a douche, with no honor, plain and simple.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
