Anime Girls Rock!

TER ID # 347769

-- Modified on 7/14/2020 1:22:29 AM

Was this monger bro Burton?

Hey Rocketbro

Got it. Yeah I've came into contact with Burton on RM, we talked for a bit via pm.

is no good.  Anybody got a new one, so we can see who you're referring to?

2020LSC.com

Queen LaLa has returned!

Well we DO have Shill Fridays for that type of "sharing" information. It doesn't really matter if you are involved with the business or not to me -- though that would probably be yet another rules violation if you were.

Let me set the record straight...

Shill threads

You have been supportive of the threads I start Jensen; and your input is appreciated and valued!

is that, even though we all like to talk about our favorites, there is a line in the sand that is defined by the TER rule he pasted into his post.  So we are bound by TER's definition of shilling and not our own.  I don't see anything wrong with your post, but you do give praise to some girls.  If BoardAdmin views it as a shill, then the ENTIRE THREAD will come down and the OP has been responsible for wasting the time of every poster that added to the thread.  That's why I don't often participate in these kinds of threads.  There have been too many instances where I take 20 minutes to add my perspective, and then a few days later, its all gone.  Jensen wasn't being critical, he was just reminding you to be circumspect when starting a thread to keep it in generalities and avoid praising specific girls, lest you run afoul of the TER posting guidelines.  If you do it on Fridays as he explains and write a review by the weekend you can praise them all you want and others are limited as far contradictory or negative comments about her on your thread.  

and it would hardly be the only thing they have gotten wrong over the years, but like it or not it is TER's board and they are entitled to go by the definition that they want to use and here is the only definition of a shill post that counts here.

TER's definition may well be wrong, but as said by others it is their board (and they get to enforce how they choose).

To be fair, twoon, shilling is not necessarily done for direct financial gain. In general it can be someone with direct affiliation to a product/service/person they're shilling. Otherwise, "paid shill" would be an oxymoron.  

This is an example of what is acceptable.

giving lessons on how to create Monger ThreADs now? LOL

I also think the mild shill post is acceptable, but also can see how it can turn slippery slope. If one can do it for one girl, then this means that anyone can do it for any girl. And that can turn ugly fast, maybe not on this kgirl subforum, but on other subforums for sure.

to the basics.  There should be no confusion after GaGa's example.  If someone leads with an ISO, after that, its all fair game.

It's what TER rules permit, and the "mild shill post" regardless of how any of us feel about it is still a shill post and therefore still against TER rules. That doesn't mean that Admin is going to pull every or even any of them, TER is not known for evenhanded enforcement of their own rules, especially in this era of board moderation via RAP, but TER "could" and by the rules "should" be disallowing those shill posts regardless of how we think about them.

Thanks everyone for your guidance and support!  I've got my problemas, but I'm well intentioned.

I don't know how you concluded that I don't get that it doesn't matter what we think in this case. I pretty much say as much, and in fact I conclude it's not a bad policy because of slippery slope.  

I am simply trying to clarify the TER rules, while you are Jensen are discussing whether or not you agree with the rule. That's what I mean by "it doesn't matter what WE think"

I'm OK with it. On the last board I was on, there was little moderation and some people would go ahead and shamelessly advertise or post daily lineups (even tho there was a whole separate subforum for ads) before I started moderating stuff via a security hole.

That said, although the boards are not as actively moderated as they once were, RAP does have it's place here and "if" the board starts becoming overrun by thinly veiled ads by pimps or pseudo pimps you are not only free to RAP, but you are encouraged to do so and I can assure you that I will be doing the exact same thing as I have seen boards that are nothing but ads and all actual discussion gets lost.

I started by pointing out the actual rule. What I was saying next had not thing to do with agreement or not but rather the view that IF one is going to violate the rule just do it openly and not play games to get around it.

Back at NotAMPmaps, Frank and Muff were the mods.  At Nuerotic Donkey, George was the mod.  I was free to create and regulate my own threads.  I prolly wrote about 200 reviews.

You can promote with a "back door" approach.  (When I say "back door" I'm not saying you can freely promote girls that offer anal.  Lol)

Ι think Pap’s purpose is a bit different than you stated. How effective he is at that purpose is an entirely different discussion.
From what I read of his posts over the years, it seems the common thread is anything he can think of that has even a remote chance of disrupting the kgirl agencies’ business. With the additional intent of simple self promotion.
When he’s not self promoting or defending his “reputation”, he’s always trying to damage the reputation and/or reduce the appeal of kgirls in general.
Still, that’s just my opinion. Any and all are free to disagree.