placing them within an airport to surveil a crowd in general, NOT going through customs and immigration where they specifically make you stand there while they take your photo.
You seem to agree that they already run photos against "suspicious" individuals. Why would you not think that database would include hooker ads? Don't you think the government would like to catch foreign working girls coming here on tourist visas that are scamming the system? You said you "doubt" they are doing it, but that's really just speculation on your part, and yet you agree they are doing it in some form. You sound a little confused to me. Obviously, if the database photo turns out to be someone else, a girl will be exhonorated, but that's probably not going to happen in this case. Most of your argument is speculation and your link is about something else entirely. She wasn't arrested, but her passport was taken while they investigate. Are you saying they aren't allowed to do that?Hey all,
Long time lurker first time poster. I do have a long history of reviews, though, and just an average dick.
So here in NYC, the Kgirls are rarely that great. They're good, but compared to the photos I've seen of the LA Kgirls, they're definitely second rate. I've always been NYC based in my mongering, but now I've got a job that requires significant travel - essentially four days out of almost every week. So I've been spreading my wings and looking around. And I'm about to spend a few weeks in LA.
I went to DC a couple weeks ago and was approved and met a girl from one of the top four D.C. Kgirl agencies, and she did not look nearly as great as the photos provided. So questions were raised. Now back here in NYC, I took the time to go see Star at asianfantasy here, and the photos are of Ena from LA based on a google image search. On the Asianfantasy site, her face is blurred. On the Cityvibe ad of Ena, her face is not blurred. The girl I saw here in NYC does not bear much resemblance to the unblurred girl inthe photo.
Have any of you seen Ena, and does she look like the photos, or is it all kinda bait and switch everywhere?
Thanks!!
Sadly no. Don't expect too much from the photos. They are just to represent the girls, not meant to be accurate. 1% of the time girl is better than photo, 99% photos are better. Watch out for age and description as well.
Long time lurker first time poster. I do have a long history of reviews, though, and just an average dick.
So here in NYC, the Kgirls are rarely that great. They're good, but compared to the photos I've seen of the LA Kgirls, they're definitely second rate. I've always been NYC based in my mongering, but now I've got a job that requires significant travel - essentially four days out of almost every week. So I've been spreading my wings and looking around. And I'm about to spend a few weeks in LA.
I went to DC a couple weeks ago and was approved and met a girl from one of the top four D.C. Kgirl agencies, and she did not look nearly as great as the photos provided. So questions were raised. Now back here in NYC, I took the time to go see Star at asianfantasy here, and the photos are of Ena from LA based on a google image search. On the Asianfantasy site, her face is blurred. On the Cityvibe ad of Ena, her face is not blurred. The girl I saw here in NYC does not bear much resemblance to the unblurred girl inthe photo.
Have any of you seen Ena, and does she look like the photos, or is it all kinda bait and switch everywhere?
Thanks!!
This phenomenon of excessive photoshopping seems to have increased dramatically over the past few years. As mentioned, it's best to just use the pictures as a guide. Also, read between the lines. When the gal lists her vital stats do they make sense? Factor in height and weight especially when it says her build is "thin". All this being said, I don't think the kgirls are any more egregious than most other providers in this matter. Just remember the old adage of "...if it seems too good to be true...." Ciao!
I don't spend much time researching and use photos and my own experience as a guide to TOFTT. I know few use their real photos and most use either representation, enhanced, or old photos.
But if I like their photos, there is no Kgirl I would avoid even after seeing low score reviews. I don't call it bait and switch if I don't turn tail and run. So far, I power through all the girls I see no matter what.
After walking inside, I promptly forget their photos or what people said. I probably won't recognize them if I see them again on the street. So, for what's it worth, I can give you a list of pretty accurate pics currently in LA and you can check out TER and CV to choose who to see. These are not the only girls I like:
Nabi, Reah, Stella, Coco (TER 319882), Cami, Hera, Avani, Joy (TER 306465), Megan, Ava, Quinn, Cia, Sexy Cynthia, Kiss, Cona
Is that INS is now using facial recognition software at airports. US is not the only place. If you've traveled internationally in the past few years, you've probably encountered it yourself.
I was recently contacted by a former regular of mine who said she took a vacation outside the US and when she returned to the US, they matched her photo up to a CV ad that was not photoshopped. They confiscated her passport pending further investigation. Stressful for her as you might imagine.
As far as the bodies, butts are made to look curvier and boobs larger, except the D cup girls, of course.
Now there is another reason! I'm afraid to fart in my own car now because Jake will turn me in for air pollution. Really frightening with your post and the upcoming IPS selling info. Time to move to the North Pole, build an igloo and have some fun with a First Person.
Ok. Retina scans is maybe 5 yrs away^^ But damn this tech stuff is getting me nervous as we could very well be being scanned as we enter these incalls and being recorded into a profiling machince database for john likely hood!!! Shit!!!!
not able to search now but a few months back I ran across an article on a new company making clothing that was patterned to confuse the facial recognition software. And I wouldn't be too surprise if people didn't start adoption fads like excessive makeup -- think FX/Face Off level.
the UK and EU on business, I had a face scan at entry points in several countries. Not sure if they ran it right then or just archived it for future reference.
I don't disbelieve that you heard that story, but I disbelieve that this is actually the case.
Most governmental agencies will not be trolling the internet for images that are not verified to match against facial recognition. At this early stage in the technology they will be restricting their search to high. Ali's targets and verified photos of those targets.
So many girls use fake photos and it is so easy to claim that you are a model whose photos were stolen, I just don't buy it.
traveled much internationally lately. Your photo is in your passport, so why do YOU think they need to take another photo of you at immigration check points?
If I knew who you were, I would PM you the girl's name and you could ask her yourself, but don't recall seeing you on this board. A couple of my LA hobby bro's heard the same story direct from the girl, so I have no reason to believe she was lying. She didn't ask me for any kind of help, so what would be the point of making it up?
Obviously if you are traveling internationally you need your passport which has photo I'd and for the most part domestically you "need" photo ID as well. But they are searching your face against a database of faces that they are suspicious of. I am sure they populate that database from all sorts of sources but I doubt that they populate from photos pulled off the web of suspected prostitution websites. There is no corroboration that the faces on the website are actually of women participating in prostitution.
Moreover facial recognition technology is not nearly as accurate as Hollywood would make you believe. I'm not in law enforcement but have seen some demonstrations in a related field.
The technology is new and they don't want to tax it; and everybody, even DHS has ltd budgets. Why would they populate their database with millions of images of suspected prostitutes? Every additional image uploaded increases the costs and time of a search and decreases the accuracy of searches for the people they are really concerned about.
I don't blame the women for being paranoid and one day this probably will be implemented so it makes sense to start obscuring faces now.
I also doubt whether DHS would divulge what/why they pulled somebody. They would either deny entry or not.
I'm not even saying the lady is lying, she'd could be confused or mistaken about why she was pulled over for additional questioning.
placing them within an airport to surveil a crowd in general, NOT going through customs and immigration where they specifically make you stand there while they take your photo.
You seem to agree that they already run photos against "suspicious" individuals. Why would you not think that database would include hooker ads? Don't you think the government would like to catch foreign working girls coming here on tourist visas that are scamming the system? You said you "doubt" they are doing it, but that's really just speculation on your part, and yet you agree they are doing it in some form. You sound a little confused to me. Obviously, if the database photo turns out to be someone else, a girl will be exhonorated, but that's probably not going to happen in this case. Most of your argument is speculation and your link is about something else entirely.
She wasn't arrested, but her passport was taken while they investigate. Are you saying they aren't allowed to do that?
I have only been disappointed twice with Kgirls who I were better looking in photos. Several times I have been surprised when the Kgirl is far better looking in person. I guess I have been, mostly, lucky.
I suppose the accuracy of the photos in ads depends on the agency. I have seen a few ads where the girls posed in the same garage-like set with a motorcycle. I've wondered about those Kgirls.
Possibly Honda Magna. I wouldn't mind riding that. Unless my eyes deceived me, she was the real thing 
she was great
Long time lurker first time poster. I do have a long history of reviews, though, and just an average dick.
So here in NYC, the Kgirls are rarely that great. They're good, but compared to the photos I've seen of the LA Kgirls, they're definitely second rate. I've always been NYC based in my mongering, but now I've got a job that requires significant travel - essentially four days out of almost every week. So I've been spreading my wings and looking around. And I'm about to spend a few weeks in LA.
I went to DC a couple weeks ago and was approved and met a girl from one of the top four D.C. Kgirl agencies, and she did not look nearly as great as the photos provided. So questions were raised. Now back here in NYC, I took the time to go see Star at asianfantasy here, and the photos are of Ena from LA based on a google image search. On the Asianfantasy site, her face is blurred. On the Cityvibe ad of Ena, her face is not blurred. The girl I saw here in NYC does not bear much resemblance to the unblurred girl inthe photo.
Have any of you seen Ena, and does she look like the photos, or is it all kinda bait and switch everywhere?
Thanks!!
Oh, shit, I meant to post that on the cliche board. Some of the photos are pretty accurate, some aren't. Some of the reviews are pretty accurate, some are inflated, some are unfair. Ymmv. Treat her right! We kissed like long lost high school lovers. She o'd several times. I liked dining at the y, even though a thousand cocks were recently there. She tasted sweet.
Well, that's la, probably different from other mongering havens. Happy to help. Nothing like a hot little ass, a wet hungry pussy and a shot of whiskey.
I would like to see her 
You speak like a kindred spirit. Treat her right. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. YMMV. They are what I want to convey in all of my reviews. I am not doing a good job there.
To paraphrase, I try to treat her right! I always kiss like a virgin. I can't tell if she o sometimes. I am a lover of clam chowder. I taste something good but I don't want to think too much about it.
Whiskey makes me fall asleep but tequila gives me wing.
Are we still talking about Ena or some other Kgirl? I am not the sharpest knife in the drawer 
Of experience, repeated viewing of photos, repeated visits of girls, and then one day your brain will either magically create a close to real depiction of the girl based on the photos, or tells you to run. I know, it is not what you want to hear but it is all I can offer you, other than to spend a lot of time reading reviews for a particular girl and look for parts where the reviewer is trying to describe the girl in relation to her photos.
There was once a discussion here about trying to exchange information about picture accuracy, but it kind of died on the vine. Maybe one day a system will be set up for us to easily do so.
My experience ... NYC ... the kgirls charge more and are a little more demanding. However, if you are visiting the spa places, I would say looks are 75% of the time, incorrect. There is one place I like 'aamp' but hardly has kgirls. They bring in international Asian girls ... who mostly speak fluent English that I enjoy. I stopped paying attention to names when the big crackdown happened since everyone started changing names like underwear. They have locations in midtown west and east. Recently had an Asian cutie from UK - that accent and short-hari, was in heaven!
In DC, I'd say the pictures are about 5-10 years old. Cannot speak for everyone else - but, it seems that if a girl says she is 23, add 10 years. I enjoy the older ones though ... So, my mind automatically ages the photo about 10 years. Remember, most of the photos are heavily airbrushed and PS'd. Even with recent pics ... I would still age the photo about 5 years.
In LA ... it seems 'closer' to the representation than in DC. I've only been approved with 2 agencies in LA ... and I think I was super lucky based on everybody else's difficulties. The girls I visited there ... tended to be closer to the age they stated -- if they advertised 23-25, then, they were around late 20's. Definitely not mid or early 20's; but, late 20's. A few were definitely in their 30's. Their pictures tended to be a bit more accurate than I've seen in DC and definitely when compared to NYC.
Overall, it's not a complete B&S (unlike some places in NYC) ... but, I would tend to age the photo's a bit, expect more wrinkles, less perky breasts, less perky butt, etc.