A few days ago, a new profile was created for a Bay Area K-Girl named "Jenna."  Here's the link to her profile:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jenna-5107753664-350411

 
Her ad says she is 21.  The reviewer didn't take the word of the org that posted the ad.  He judged for himself and said she is 36-40.  And when he answered the question about the photos being accurate, he said they were the "Photos of another person."  

 
So far, she says she's 21 but she could be as old as forty.  And she's a completely different person than the girl in the photo.  You'll have to read the review to see how he describes her body and performance.  I will say this though, and it applies to ALL providers, if a man is disappointed by a girl's looks, it is always reflected in her performance score. ALWAYS.

 
You may say that this is his first review so what the fuck does he know.  Read his review carefully - this isn't his first rodeo.  He's been around the block a few times.  But maybe he used a different handle for this review because he's afraid of the repercussions for writing this review.

 
After the review came out, Jenna went on "vacation."  But she's coming back tomorrow and she's STILL going to be 21 and she's STILL going to have  the "Photos of another person."  Does this org think K-mongers are stupid?

 
So whose side are you on?  The reviewer and all the mongers who will save $220 and a lot of disappointment thanks to the HONEST review or the K-Girl (woman) and the org who will lose some money because they won't get away with their deception.

 
Jenna's profile is how all K-girl profiles should be created.  From what I see, guys are more honest in the Bay Area than in L.A.  I've been on this board since Day One and I've seen how L.A. guys are afraid to say anything negative for fear of being blacklisted.  Hopefully, that will change.  Money talks - the orgs should listen.  

 
Warning!  TER rules forbid writing anything in a post that is contained in the General Details and Juicy Details of a review.  That information is for VIP members only.  Not all posters are VIP members so they cannot see her score or anything about the session and you can't reveal that info in a post.  A friendly heads-up so you won't get into trouble with TER.

-- Modified on 6/19/2020 1:52:35 AM

This seems like it belongs on the Newbie board.

This is exactly the kind of review that TER was created for. A review that warns other mongers about deceptive practices, misleading pics and poor service, although in this case it doesn't sound like he had "that bad" a time, but that's just nitpicking on my part, by and large I agree we need MORE reviews like this, not less. So we are in agreement here.

 
That said, here is my question to you. Why is it only overly flattering reviews of K-GIRLS that offends you so? There are countless OTHFBs with page after page of 10-10 reviews that are clearly a product of review manipulation, but when it's WHITE girls, nary a peep from you. Do you have an issue with Asians, or just the guys who prefer them? Or is there some other explanation for why you seem to only bash the BSU's on this board, while giving the spineless jellyfish on the other boards a complete pass for THEIR gutless behavior?

Hey Rocketbro, you session with Jenna?

Your input is appreciated!

Papasan, your points are valid.

With your permission, I'd like to comment on your thread.  

I agree any form of deception is wrong.

That being said, most of us agree fake glams or glams with Photoshop are the norm.  Mostly because of facial recognition software by LE.  ATF Mina uses fake glams. I think she's hotter in person than her fake glams.

I'm all about the service.  I do not find a correlation between prettiness and service.  Kgirl can be a 7 looks and that won't get in the way of her delivering me a magnificent session.

Just my opinion.

Respectfully submitted.

YMMV

-- Modified on 6/19/2020 8:33:20 PM

Yeah, I have. She is nothing like her pics, and yea she's in her 40s. I'd only recommend if one has a soft spot for spinners. In fact, I think I brought up the fact that she has "photos accurate" even tho they're nothing like her, multiple times on this board before. There's a reason her regular profile reviews are under 7 for both appearance and performance.

He despises Kgirls.  Here's a link to him calling them cum-dumpsters, disease-carrying and disgusting on another TER board.  Presumably, it doesn't matter whether their profile is honest or not, he refers to ALL of them this way.  

He has been talking "down" to Kgirl fans for as long as the Kgirl board has been here.  He thinks those of us that like Kgirls are the dumbest of the TER membership and he is far superior.  You will get used to his arrogance and  self-aggrandizing posts where he tries to explain things at first-grade level to us Kgirl fans.  One of the FEW indie providers he saw posted that he had "dead-fish breath".  He whined to the mods and had it taken down.  He's a well- know post-puller here, and has been called out for it for years.  Most Newbies here have at least seen a few Kgirls.  He has seen none,  but yet he doesn't think he should be on the Newbie board.  Total  lack of self-awareness. He writes derogatory shit about Kgirls all the time and then wonders why he can't pass screening to see them.

about a TER profile with ONE review that reads like a hit-piece.  This is exactly the kind of retaliatory review that guys use who have a grievance against a Kgirl.  Why don't you wait until she has four or five more reviews and see if this review doesn't become the outlier.  If that happens, you are going to look ever more stupid than you do by putting so much stock into ONE review.  I'm not saying its honest or dishonest, but I don't know how you, with your years of NON-EXPERIENCE with Kgirls can just blatantly call this an honest review.  Lets see what some other guys say who have actually seen her before we start calling this guy "honest".  Its his first fucking review.  On  what basis can you say for certain he's honest?  If you blindly accept this ONE review as factual, then you don't have much experience with reviews.  How many reviews have you written?  I'm talking altogether, including Kgirls AND indies (and sheep, if you like).  Do you feel whatever this number is makes you uniquely qualified to say with certainty that this  ONE review accurately represents this Kgirl?  

 
It has been discussed often here about how guys get burned relying too heavily on one, two, no reviews.  You must have been hiding somewhere during those times.

"A K-girl is a high volume provider who charges less...
...than the going rate in their area.  They're usually young, good looking and provide uniformly excellent service.  

They are very much in demand because of their low price and good service. And it's hard to get to see them because they have bookers who are very selective."

 
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/a-k-girl-is-a-high-volume-provider-who-charges-less-4161?frmSearch=1#4161

 
Hey dummy, maybe I hacked into TER and faked that post just like I hacked into TER and created a "fake white list."
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Haven’t been trolling this board for more than 5 years.  How does THAT amount to Kgirl experience?

 
I noticed you completely skipped GaG callimg you out for your duplicity.   No defense to that???

 
You’re still trying to defend your white list scam.  That just draws more attention to.  

 
“The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”
—-W.S.

-- Modified on 6/20/2020 6:39:54 AM

What are you babbling on about? What fucking hit piece? Smh. Jenna has a regular profile here:

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jenna-4086184339-347782

She isn't well reviewed. What makes it misleading is that her regular profile says pics accurate, while it clearly isn't.  

As usual, it is YOUR assumptions that always tend to assume the monger at fault,for some reason. Every. Fucking. Time. You always rush to girl and org rescue, even though you say "it takes two to tango". Every. Fucking. Time. I get it, that statement only exonerated the girl/org, not the monger.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/re-jenna-18521?page=1

 
Go ahead, attack him too.  Say he has "millennial hubris" or something equally absurd.  Keep on taking the side of K-girls and bookers instead of K-mongers.

And are you reporting these bad reviews to have them corrected?

Are you even trying to explain to people how they might, or that then can, do that?

Last, as GaG pointed out, this is not just something that happens with K-Girls, or even Asian providers. Why the seeming bias?

My Problem Reports are approved over 90% of the time.  I currently have well over TEN YEARS of VIP days in my account from doing Problem Reports.  

 
No, I will not tell people how to do Problem Reports.  I figured it out for myself; they can too.  You'd have to write 20 reviews per month to get as many VIP days as I get from doing Problem Reports.

 
No bias - I'm an equal opportunity problem reporter.  The problem is K-reviewers - they ignore and even flout TER rules.   One of the main reasons TER was started was to keep track of providers who changed their names so they couldn't run away from bad reviews.  Among non-K-girls, you'll see many multiple name profiles - "Angel/Barbie/Candy/Daisy."

 
Among K-girls, you rarely see profiles with multiple names even though it's common knowledge they change names all the time.  In fact, K-mongers discuss it here frequently, giving the multiple names they use.   But they use the euphemism "rebranding" to make it seem like it's okay.  That's bullshit - "rebranding" is changing names, against TER rules, and should be reported.  Why is it acceptable for K-Girls to change their names and not be reported by K-mongers to TER when all the rest of TER reports non K-girls who change their names?  They may say: "Well, that's the K-girl business model, to change names when they move to another city."  To that I say: "FUCK their business model!  This is TER, you have to play by TER's rules.  If you don't like it, start your own review site."  Oh yeah, you did.  How'd that work out for you?

Good. That will do a lot more good than the bitching here.

Why not bother to tell people about how to report a problem (I have not done so for several months now and forget what I actually did but seemed to  be trivial -- or so I guess as I don't recall it being so much trouble I just said eff this. That would probably be really good sig line for your comments and posts. Of course, before someone can correct a profile they actually have to see the provider in question.

We used to see a number of K-girls with multiple names on their profile here on the east coast but I cannot think of many current ones (with 2020 reviews, just one comes to mind). It does make a lot of sense to allow some renames for touring and don't really see that as a "rebranding" game, thought clearly can be for some. And that can be addressed with the multiple names

And to a large extent I do support the their model and if you don't like it there is not too much you can do. Scream about it if you want but if that doesn't change the cash flow you are wasting your breath. Makes more sense to me to focus on what I actually have some control over and the ads are something I have very limited control over. As I've asked some of the Cali guys, if the K-scene is really as bad as claimed why spend your money there? Plenty of other options. I think Sag basically said that is what he plans to do.  

As for what TER is for, if it's for the mongers and they are doing what you don't like, well, that is what they want. So, yeah, start a new site and be sure to enforce (not sure just how you would do that) the standards. If not then maybe a bit less whining. Like I say, if the world (other people) is doing things you don't like and they don't want to listen or follow your lead (or you don't want to show them as you say above), that's just how the world is. Take that as a given and plan accordingly.

He won't tell you how to do it because he's not here to help anyone, he's only here to denigrate Kgirls and those of US who see them.  That's been his game on THIS board fro day one.  I had him pegged years ago that he is only out to help himself.  Its why he picks on the problems in Kgirl profiles while giving Indie providers a pass.  There are just as many, if not more, problems with indie profiles as there is with Kgirl profiles.  Yet he only makes an issue of the Kgirl problems.  Its because he hates Kgirls.  GaG was right to call him out, and you, too, and all we get from him is crickets.  He has no defense why he  picks on Kgirls.  

 
If you want an example of how pathetic this is, he claims to have 20 years of VIP from writing problem reports. If he was really good at this, he would have found that Jenna had multiple profiles.  He started the thread with  a profile that had ONE review.  Rocket came along and linked the other profile (NOT under a different name), he didn't.   A problem report gets you one day of VIP.  A review gets you 15 (recently there was a period where it was double).  He's already been here about 15 years, and yet has enough VIP days earned from problem reports to pay for the past, and for another 20 years.  All of these problem reports to save $18 per month for VIP.  He can't write reviews because no providers will see him.  (They usually don't see trolls.)  Any one that has to submit 30 problem reports per month to save $18 can only be described as a pathetic loser.  His other nickname is Broke-Dick-Mountain.   He has made a full time career of saving $18 a month.  He thinks its the big-time.  I spend twice that on lunch each day.  

 
Lastly, I agree with your points.  TER is the grande dame of review sites.  The review culture was grown here.  It may not be perfect, but it beats the hell out of whatever is in second place.  I vote for a little less whining, too.  I believe ER is still in business.  Oh wait . . . .  many here already tried that one.  Lol

Yours had one.  If you are so good at problem reports, why didn't you have these combined before you started the thread and used all eleven reviews as your example.  Are you sure you know how to do a problem report?  

 
I stand by my analysis on the basis of your OP.  If you have put up Rocket's profile, then I would have agreed with you, but I stand by my advice not to put too much stock into ONE review, which is what YOU did.  With the other ten that ROCKET found, that you couldn't, I agree this girl is not good.  I don't know why she is still in play with new guys.  Kudos to Rocket for making you look stupid by your omission, Mr. Problem Report.  Bwahahahahaha

“The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”
—-W.S.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/nobody-ever-suggested-you-----18536?frmSearch=1#18536

 
Methinks ye doth protest too much.  
-with apologies to W. S.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/re-the-best-evidence----5813?frmSearch=1#5813

 
"Methinks ye protest too much"         -Shakespeare
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/re-manwich-if-you----4621?frmSearch=1#4621

 
"The lady doth . . . .
protest too much, methinks."        --W.S.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/the-lady-doth-----962846?frmSearch=1#962846

 
As W.S. once said, "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/wow-did-i-hit-a-nerve------953903?frmSearch=1#953903

 
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/as-the-bard-penned-in-hamlet-------953268?frmSearch=1#953268

 
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/all-of-this-to-----928650?frmSearch=1#928650

 
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/to-quote-the-bard-----905618?frmSearch=1#905618

 
Methinks the "gentleman" doth protest too much.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/with-apologies-to-ws-----891647?frmSearch=1#891647

 
Methinks ye doth protest too much . . .
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/methinks-ye-doth-protest-too-much----864920?frmSearch=1#864920

I  saw  Jenna about twenty times. She was among the  first "new PSE", and quite young. That was a LONG time ago,  many orgs ago. Still has the same  pics with the kitty gloves. She ain't that any more. YMMV, of course. SMDH. If she's under thirty, so am I.

sag

Shakespeare is not to your taste.  Maybe you have been culturally deprived for too  long.  More overreach by you.  I haven't mentioned it before on THIS board since 2016, and most of the guys here neither go to the GD board nor were here in 2016, so what is your point with the timing?

 
But with you, its ALWAYS an appropriate response and always gets a predictable attempt at deflection.  If you want to continue to talk about your white list scam, I'm more than willing to it, but before we start, how about a little walk down memory lane to the GD board for a look where you first tried to put one over on the rest of the TER membership, and I called you out, and of course, the ensuing total meltdown and Kgirl rant from you?  Your reaction during the successive exchange proved I got it right.  To this day, no public denial that I'm aware of, because you know Carla could come on the board and set the record straight.  

-- Modified on 6/21/2020 3:38:56 PM

CDL is 💯% spot on about TER's resident Troll.

Rocketbro is a legit monger who buys pussy.  BigPOS is an imposter.

Last night, BigPOS came on the kgirl thread and tried to fear monger with a Tale of Woe in LA's ktown that had absolutely nothing to do with kgirls.  My condolences to the affected family.  

Our beloved kgirls are already freaked out enough.

BigPOS, you do this shit again and I will call your punk ass out.  I may be the most non-confrontational monger you'll ever meet; but don't test my resolve you no good mother fucker.

-- Modified on 6/22/2020 9:19:46 AM

I can safely say from my observations and interactions with him over the past five years that he has no social skills, no self-awareness and no concept of lines that shouldn't be crossed.  That's just three of the reasons (there are more) providers won't see him anymore, not even the indies.

"It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."

Unlike YOU, I quoted the Bard correctly.  Your quote was different and fucked up each of the ten times you used it.

faux superior attitude is on full display now in your role as an internet troll, while your cubicle-dwelling, pussy-less life you keep hidden  in shame.  You think you are better than everyone here because we patronize Kgirls, and you consider them disgusting.  The only thing that MIGHT be disgusting about a Kgirl is having to be the next customer after your fat ass sweats all over her, but thankfully, that will never happen, because you can't get in to see Kgirls.  No booker in his right mind is going to let your troll-ass into an incall.  So go ahead and feel superior in your pathetic fantasy world while you sit in your run-down hovel tonight waiting for your Kraft Mac and Cheese mix to heat up . . . . . all five boxes that you eat at one time!!!   Bwahahahahahahaha.  

Out of the kindness of my heart, I have decided to mentor the Troll.

Your lesson shall commence immediately.

First, your new name is 'Papa babo'.  The kgirls will understand when you introduce yourself.  They may snicker, sneer and point at you and laugh but you'll get used to it.  It's their way of acknowledging you!

Wash up real good and brush your teeth.  Then gargle with mouth wash.  Wear clean biZ casual attire.  No shirt, no shoes, no service.  Got it?!

Anyonghaseo means hello in Korean.  Refer to the working girl as Ms.  

Try to talk as little as possible.  

You need to borrow $280 from your Mom for the donation amount.

Smile even though you are miserable soul.

Introduce yourself, bow respectfully and gently hand  her the donation; at this point she'll pretend to like you.  Or ask you to leave.  But again, try to talk as little as possible.  

You must ask for permission to touch her.  She may cringe but that's to be expected...

Follow her instructions to the letter.

Since you have a very small cock, I recommend you start with a spinner.  

We shall continue your lesson tomorrow.

Any questions?!?!

-- Modified on 6/22/2020 6:37:06 PM

-- Modified on 6/22/2020 9:53:52 PM

-- Modified on 6/22/2020 9:56:12 PM

-- Modified on 6/22/2020 10:01:38 PM

-- Modified on 6/22/2020 10:02:19 PM

-- Modified on 6/22/2020 10:15:47 PM

-- Modified on 6/22/2020 10:31:16 PM

So, what do you have control over? Maybe reviews? Oh wait, you were the one who told a guy he should try two times a girl who he thoughtas "blah" and maybe if he really likes reviews, only then submit it. So even where you have control, it does not seem like you even acknowledge the problem. You certainly seemed to view a new girl's subpar review (and perhaps lost business) as something that is more of a problem than potential misled mongers.  

 
Interesting that you'd make a thread asking the extent of harm of false advertisement, only to throw your hands up in the end saying the banal "if it's so bad why you keep paying" nonsense. Disappointing.  

 
Reminds me of all the "if the USA is so bad why you live here" nonsense.
USA is a good country to live in, yet it has many inherent problems that should not be swept under the rug. And it helps a lot to talk about those problems beforehand rather than pretend they do not exist until they blow up in your face.  

 
Exactly the same thing can be said for the kgirl orgs. Yelling loud on active forum with active customers does the trick sometimes. Maybe not on this forum, but certainly have worked before elsewhere. The more orgs probe waters and sense they can get away with something, they will continue to do so. A lot of orgs don't give a fuck about their reputation anymore as long as it makes money. Letting them know their product sucks, from time to time (and not in a good way) keeps them grounded. Of course, if it's consistent with experience.  

 

Let me make this perfectly clear. For whatever reason (you don't think it's a problem, etc) you are not even using what you have control over, even worse - just the opposite. Discouraging mediocre review of toft is directly playing for the orgs. Yet somehow, when pressed, you stated a criteria that is a lot more rigid than a lot of people in the bay. Something doesn't quite add up here. I'm pretty sure dmv area doesn't have a better scene than we do. Judging from all reports, it should be even worse in your area.

And there's nothing "faux" about my superior attitude.  I am superior to you in every way.  Remember, it was YOU with your inferior intellect who tried quoting Shakespeare FIRST, but you failed miserably by repeatedly botching a simple one-line quote.  I came back with a Shakespeare quote that fits you to a T.  It was a brilliant riposte and you had nothing in return except an ad hominem attack which revealed your feeble intellect.

 
It was YOU who said: "...ad hominem personal attacks and NO substantive argument  on the topic.  Looks like you are completely intellectually bankrupt."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/two-posts-on-this-thread-with-----363507?page=

 
Looks like YOU are COMPLETELY...INTELLECTUALLY...BANKRUPT.

-- Modified on 6/22/2020 8:42:00 PM

You wanted to be BFFs with me.  and in the beginning we were friends.  But I got so tired of your lies and bullshit, I told you to fuck off.  Go ahead and deny it, I'll find your posts kissing my ass and shove them in your face.  You have me pegged...ROFLMAO.  The only thing you have "pegged" is your ass with a big dildo.

 
You said: "...he claims to have 20 years of VIP from writing problem reports."  That's another one of your lies.  I will pay for the next 20 years of your visits to K-girls if you can prove I said that.  You're a fucking bullshitter.

 
You said: "A problem report gets you one day of VIP."  You state that with such certainty but of course you're wrong.  You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.  You're full of shit as usual, a pathetic liar about everything.

"In every way?" . . . . . . .    Dude, this is fuck board.  How many Kgirls have you fucked?  I've done over 800.  How many indies have you fucked?  I've done over 150.  Lets see, you have about a dozen whitelists, one fake for sure, probably more, and TWO reviews, so maybe a dozen or so girls you have fucked in 15 years here?  So your claim to fame is that your Shakespeare is more polished than mine . . . . on a fuckboard???  And that makes you superior?  You really are clueless and just proved my statements that you have no self-awareness.  

 
So we will be sure to remember that your superior knowledge of Kgirls is not because you have seen any, and not because you have ever dealt with a booker, or an org, but because you are better at looking up Shakespeare quotes than I am.  Do you really expect that to fly on a Kgirl fuckboard?  Are you really that self-absorbed that you think Shakespeare gets you cred with Kgirl mongers?   How much more of a loser can you possibly become?  (I know you'll think of a way.  Every time I think you have hit bottom, you prove me wrong.)    Bwahahahahahaha  

...intellectual superiority when you haughtily said:  "Well, I'm sorry that . . . .Shakespeare is not to your taste.  Maybe you have been culturally deprived for too  long."  It was a few posts above.  Don't you remember saying I was "culturally deprived" so you could 'prove' you're superior to me?  Gawd you're dumb!

 
You are also the one who FIRST quoted Shakespeare (on a fuckboard???) in a vain attempt to prove you are the least bit intellectual.  You said: "Are you really that self-absorbed that you think Shakespeare gets you cred with Kgirl mongers?"  No, I don't but YOU obviously do.  That's why YOU quoted Shakespeare here three times and on the General board SEVEN times.  How many times have I quoted Shakespeare?  Are you really that self-absorbed that you think Shakespeare gets you cred with Kgirl mongers and other fuckboard mongers?

 
After my Shakespeare quote, you had nothing.  You caved like a little bitch and admitted I knew more Shakespeare than you so you had to run away and started talking about who has seen more K-girls.  Your deflection, distraction and diversion is patently obvious.  What's next, more ad hominem attacks?

someone else, probably Nick or Fisher.   Do you really think anyone cares on a fuckboard how much you know about Shakespeare, when you are conceding you don't know jack shit about Kgirls?  Your post is a Hail Mary, a desperate attempt to deflect from the fact that you are clueless about the subject of Kgirls other than reading what others ahvvfe posted.  This cannot be rehabilitated.  You have been exposed in all your ignorance.  

 
You can't even get indies to take your money.  Carla gave you the fake white list JUST SO she wouldn't have to actually fuck you.  They don't want to fuck you even when you're paying.  How pathetic is that?   This is typical of you when you're called out for your idiocy to go off into the weeds.  If this is your comeback on a fuckboard, you have lost this one.  Take the L and go home.  

 
Today is Tuesday, so you know what that means . . . . . .   Two hours with a hot Kgirl around lunchtime.   You'll be quoting Shakespeare, and I'll be eating a Korean taco.  Every time I think you can't become a bigger loser, you prove me wrong.   Bwahahahahahahaha!!!

Very surprised to see my name mentioned here but, while I probably do quote The Bard from time to time, I don't think I've used the quote in question.
I do often use this Shakespearean quote, however....
"Go fuck yourself! Do it today!

What part of "unless you can change the cash flow you are wasting your breath" don't you understand? You continue to want to pass everything I say though your narrow filter so you can keep attacking strawmen.

For someone that claims to be such an amazing hobbyist but not able to get much over half his sessions what he considers better than 5 and 6 it seems why have you not figured out how to get good sessions? In other words, why the fuck should ANYONE listen to ANYTHING you have to say. Most of us, I believe, want to have a good time not have crappy sessions and then pat ourselves on the back for calling out how we keep striking out but that it was really the org that is causing all the problem.

As I said before, if CA is really that bad (I suspect not given there are a lot of happy mongers it seems) go find someone else to play with. Clearly your approach has not changed the actual reality and it's not clear you've even done anything to improve the sites you participate on.

I first started posting on the LA and Kgirl boards.  You seemed all right to me.  I did wonder why few others would even talk to you, but over the span of a few months, I realized you didn't know shit about Kgirls, other than what you read that others posted.  Then, despite how friendly I was towards you, you started ad hominem attacks about posting Kgirl info on the LA regional board.  I didn't realize you were so territorial until you got really vicious.  So I started to ask around, both to other mongers and some of the LA indies (including some that you had seen), and started pushing back, and just like here, every time I kicked your ass, you just got more vicious, until here you are today.  Some of the ladies you saw had some interesting insights about you.  Example below.  

You only bragged about having TEN years of VIP in your account form problem reports (a few posts up from here), so my apologies for implying you are a bigger cheapskate that you really are.  I don't do problem reports unless its something egregious that might lead someone to a wrong conclusion, but I recall getting a +1 PM each time.  I think there were a couple where I got +2, but don't ask me what the difference was.  So lets just say you get two for each one instead of one.  That means each problem report is worth just over a whole dollar to you, rather than just paying for VIP at $18 a month.  So you spend your days looking for mistakes and problems on the TER website to save $18 a month.  You know, that still sounds like a lot of work for peanuts, but I guess its all relative to ones financial condition, isn't it?  

 
So once again, here you are, ON THE KGIRL BOARD, talking about things that are NOT Kgirl related, and making a fool of yourself because you have no self-awareness.  I guess when you have been a loser as long as you have, you have to fantasize that you are more important than anyone else thinks you are.  

Starting fights? Huh? No, I simply pointed out that you don't need to pretend like you actually want to change anything, and talk about "what one controls", since even in stuff that you do have control over, such as reviews, you give advice to do the opposite of what benefits mongers. You aren't interested or ever were interested in changing the situation. Tell me I'm wrong. Your "predatory" thread was another attempt at trying to downplay it,and when you couldn't, you decided to attack my experiences instead, even tho it I always made it clear it's not about my experiences,but others. You and cdl surely love to speak for everyone.  

 

I claimed to be an amazing hobbyist? Never once have I claimed that. Show me a link. All I claim is that I'm pro-monger and anti-bs tactics.I haven't seen you or cdl take a mongers side once. Even if its a girl who is badly reviewed by many mongerd, it always ends up the monger fault in your eyes. You will always try to think of a reason to white knight girls or orgs.  

 

Once again, you are spewing a bunch of nonsense, now with an added twist that now my opinion is useless because most of my sessions I consider avergage? Lol. Pretty pathetic. My reviews always have and always will have accurate detailed description of the girl in question,services provided and general assessment. Im pretty sure mongers are on review sites to get info about girls, not jack off to penthouse style reviews. Because I know what mongers who look for more than just a warm hole, look for in reviews. TER tends to agree with me too in their guidelines. If you think no one cares about what I have to say, I'm happy for you. There are many people who agree with me and my assessments. Now who would want to read reviews of a monger who only provides perfect or near perfect reviews? I can't speak for everyone like you do, but I know if I see a monger with all great reviews, I generally will mostly ignore his opinions on girls. Just like I mostly do with twoon (again, nothing personal there). I'm trying to see who to avoid, and if the person can't differentiate or has low standards, I'm not going to get anything out of his reviews.  

I also have great sessions with my atfs, and describe them very thoroughly (sessions and what I liked or disliked). Many people value hard graders, including back on the donkey. I'm not even a hard grader

 
It's hilarious how once again you deflected to using my experience as a basis of anythining, when the discussion here isn't even about that. When you made a topic asking what's the real harm, it was shown to you, again and again. Now you just deflect that it's somehow me who is the problem. Hilarious.  

You could've just said what cdl said right away "their games their rules". But nah, you wanted to somehow show that what I'm saying is bs. When I provided evidence and pointed to other mongers on here, you quickly changed the topic to my name experience and not general tactics of bs reviews and bs advertising.

Now you want to look like you actually care about the problem, but your hands are tied and you have no control. This isn't the case here. Stop pretending.

And yes, we have control of cash flow. If the girl had bad service, you can yell loud to avoid this girl, and you will lessen the cash flow. Write a scarhing review.  

If the guy who you tried to convince to not give a blah review gave an avergae grade to a new girl, that would lessen the cash flow. But something tells me that even if you do have a terrible session, you will never do this.

Reviews and warnings work for and against business. If bad reviews did not, then orgs wouldn't care about them. But they do. A lot.  

Bad kgirl experiences are just like any other bad product. Just because it's pussy they're selling, doenst make it any more special.

No offense taken.

You guys arguing reminds me of an old joke.  Two guys are taking a piss off a bridge over a river.  Both pride themselves on their large cocks.  One says, hey the water's cold!  And the other replies, and the river's deep too!!!

😉

How the FIRST liar doesn't stand a chance.  LOL

You comparing what I'm arguing about to dick measuring, almost insulted me. LOL

One thing I disagree with is that looks  "ALWAYS" reflect   performance scores. Case in point Lia  with M.  I was really disappointed with her looks but she was one of the best fucks I ever had.  As once described,  "she fucks like it's her last fuck on earth". That's no exaggeration. She really was other worldly in the sack.

To the OP....are you new to all this? Not being condescending, just asking.

I ask because if you've been around, you know this stuff is as old as time.

He is just not too fucking smart, actually a lot of us consider him a fucking moron. lol

you are right, this is all new to him.  He thinks he's Christopher Fucking Columbus discovering America.  GaG says he's a moron, but that's because GaG is in a good mood today.  Lol

END OF MESSAGE

Actually I heard his breath was not the only thing about him that reminded girls of a dead fish. rofl