"Everyone wants to see the 'new' girl." (Marketing 101.) If you notice, MOST of the time a name change is accompanied by a new photo gallery.
So there are a few C/J/KGirl agencies in the area that rotate girls. In some cases they will list the girl's TER number from an NYC agency (different name, pics often long gone) so we can read reviews so we dont have to toftt on a gamble (some of these agencies are blatant fraudsters when it comes to accurate pics)
They also change names with each agency. And the names they pick are sometimes just confusing AF. For example one girl, lets call here Jane, goes from agency A to agency B, and is renamed Jill. Then agency C has a girl also named Jill, who is a different person. And then sometimes Jill is working both agencies at once!
*I would understand if this were opsec related, but these are the type of agencies where screening is on the honor system, and faces are hardly ever obfuscated*
Sometimes they change names and link to old reviews and sometimes they change names and abandon a handful of positive reviews (I have not yet seen this done to avoid bad reviews).
Please advise!
There's an old girl here in LA who has gone through at least 3 names that I know of. Nancy, Silk and Popcorn. Changes her fake photos too. She has meh reviews, but reels guys back in with them.
I don’t understand the name changes when the girl has good reviews, but it happens often with the C/J agencies here in the Washington DC area. I’ve asked some of the providers and they say that it’s the agencies that assign names. In one instance, a provider moved from one DC agency to another and they changed her name. She had good reviews, but the reviews noted she was very tall. The second agency changed her name and listed this 5’9” beauty as 5’5” or 5’4”.
I think the agencies just don’t like too much info available to their customers.
You say you've not seen it as a way to drop the connection to bad reviews so the explanation has to be something else, right. With touring girls you sometimes see them with one name in one market (A) and then another elsewhere (B) because the name was already used by someone at the agency in that other market (B). But when names are different in different locations (and in some areas that can mean just different agencies in the same market) you see reviews that don't know so multiple profiles get created.
Experienced reviewers will often be aware of the reviews under the first name and create a review, using the new name, but the original profile -- or let TER know to consolidate (forget if you can enter a name when reviewing an existing provider or not). And sometimes it is related to things like the woman wanting to escape a stalker or love-struck client (so the provider would not want the profile to follow).
And there is also the whole some agencies that just don't update their sites well so different girls end up with the same names. Or I suppose worse, some grab a popular name in the area and hope some book off the name even if the girl is nothing like the one that made the reputation.
The League (Seattle; RIP) used to keep an archive of the C/J/K-girl photos with their names. By matching the PHOTOS, you easily see that Coco in NYC is Mimi in LA is Cherry in SF is Yuna in Seattle. It would good if someone (TER?) could safely (non-US website) re-establish such an archive.
.
I would usually include a TER ID# in the GENERAL review section. "This is a review of Coco ######. This is NOT Coco aaaaaa nor Coco bbbbbb and it isn't Coco cccccc, either." That way, regardless of changes in name, TER Profile number and so on, that tidbit is always in the TEXT part of the review. I recommend that others do the same!
.
There is also the problem of merging Profiles after name changes. When Coco becomes Cherry becomes Mimi, you can ask TER to MERGE the reviews (as long as there is proof, usually in the form of pictures still on each website proving that Coco = Cherry = Mimi. You should get a merged Profile of "Coco / Cherry / Mimi" with the oldest (lowest number) TER ID. Otherwise, Coco (2015, 123456) who is Cherry (2018, 234567) who is Mimi (2021, 345678) can get YOUNGER by using the age info from Mimi (345678).
.
Her are some older posts with similar ideas and suggestions:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girls-113/mention-ter-id-in-general-section-league-concordance-20379
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girls-113/coco-cherry-sunny--23879
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girls-113/re-her-pics-were-being-used-----28222
(This ^ post is about watermarking and OWNING her own pics for each agency to use. Same girl, same real pics, regardless of name.)
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girls-113/re--in-terms-of-kgirl-profiles-on-ter-imo-merging-profiles-38310
and many more.
So there are a few C/J/KGirl agencies in the area that rotate girls. In some cases they will list the girl's TER number from an NYC agency (different name, pics often long gone) so we can read reviews so we dont have to toftt on a gamble (some of these agencies are blatant fraudsters when it comes to accurate pics)
They also change names with each agency. And the names they pick are sometimes just confusing AF. For example one girl, lets call here Jane, goes from agency A to agency B, and is renamed Jill. Then agency C has a girl also named Jill, who is a different person. And then sometimes Jill is working both agencies at once!
*I would understand if this were opsec related, but these are the type of agencies where screening is on the honor system, and faces are hardly ever obfuscated*
Sometimes they change names and link to old reviews and sometimes they change names and abandon a handful of positive reviews (I have not yet seen this done to avoid bad reviews).
Please advise!
Especially with today's issues of talent getting in, some girls try to tour with different names to elicit the "new girl" feel and orgs play along because there is always demand for "fresh meat" (figuratively speaking of course).
And it us beneficial for some to be with different name and advertised as new in the area and even new to the us. It used to be most orgs would not lie outright and would not say new to the US when the girl toured here before but last couple of years... It's really anything goes. Saw many "new to us ads of girls who have been here before.
Even if the girl has decent reviews she may just be forgotten about and havinf less business. So she goes to anther your place under a difft name. Until someone figures out she already has made money off first few days. Now I'm not saying they're all doing this or even majority.
But the perception of a girl being new or unknown plays a big part. Many times have I seen a fellow monger get excited by "new" pics. Only to be told it's rebrand of that girl and disappointment because the guy has already seen the girl and she was not his cup of tea or that he thought he was gonna see someone new or unknown.
because the website used fake photos would be downright evil!
Eunmi in San Mateo used to go by Jamie. It's advertised prominently in her Eunmi ads and even in the text communication during booking. Don't really know why she didn't keep the Jamie name if they are going to broadcast her old name anyways.
"Everyone wants to see the 'new' girl." (Marketing 101.) If you notice, MOST of the time a name change is accompanied by a new photo gallery.
Isn't the new girl stuff exactly what I said too?
Also I disagree on pics.
A photo shoot pre Ai wasnt cheap. Most rebrands we'd figure out is precisely because same pic sets were used.
It's a lot tougher to impossible to figure out rebrands if they use stolen/some model pics. In that case you need connections, toftt homies and ear to the street.
I rarely read your posts lately. Same old stuff, different day. This one I read, because you replied to my post. However, your viewpoint on the business is so far out of the mainstream I have come to believe that there is nothing I can learn from reading your posts due to your outlier perspective. Not personal, just not a good use of my time.
Photo shoots rarely cost more than an average Kgirl makes in one or two days. Back before you were a customer, it was not uncommon for 90-day girls to start working with NO photos, and after a few days' work, the photos would go up on the org website because the girl had earned enough to pay for the shoot. Using another girl's photos came after that, and I agree, it made things more complicated. I have about two dozen reviews that were TOFTT and I had nothing to go on until I showed up for the first session.