True, I should have done a better job spelling out the meaning of my first post since you weren't sharp enough to understand and because you seem to have little to no sense of humor. It was a sarcastic comment mocking you for throwing up insulting words in a discussion related to insulting behavior.
We all have our blind spots like when I failed to see the ventriloquist's K-girl puppet you created made no sound when you stuck your hand who knows where. She neither dissed her lesser priced "sisters" nor revealed any contempt for a class of monger who thought she was not deserving of the price. And thanks for the offer, but I would have thought by now you'd have seen the shovel I already have is where the dirt raining down on you as I dig my hole (have you used that before, or just copying CDL?).Idk if anyone else saw her twitter post but she was just her and then came back like two weeks after. I figure get the word out in hopes she get so much business she sticks around for longer.
At Asiangem.
Contact info this time seems different, looks like perhaps she's decided not to work through an agency this time.
Kora is back touring DMV again, she must be busy busy and busy.
But heard this is her last DMV tour for the year.
But this time she doubled her rate to 1K
http://www.kora-xoxo.com/guide-1
-- Modified on 11/18/2025 9:00:54 PM
Seriously?!?! WHAT THE FUCKKK
I went to the other forum and I see the same shills who defended the org/po in the pii gate, now criticizing people for simply posting that these prices she is charging are insane.
Customers are like dirt to these people. They care more about boo boo feelings getting hurt instead of consumers expressing their feelings.
Customers get mad when prices for gas, tickets, cars get increased by a lot. But they supposed to stfu when it's pussy for some reason.
God I hate shills so fucking much.
about posters explaining, on the East Coast, specifically New York iirc, the reasons for the higher pricing?
I'm talking about people who specifically tell others to not post negative comments about the pricing. Discouraging discussion and customer expression.
Why wouldn't customer complain? Kora aka Blue Star aka Suzi aka Suzy aka SA Lisa aka AA Tiara aka Seowoo
Could've been fucked for 240 in the bay five years ago. Unless she's Benjamin Button, she got five years older and her body, including her money maker got got more mileage and wear and tear.
You ever seen a car that is five years old with more mileage on it and it's selling for 4x the price? And it ain't like it's BlueBook if you know what I mean.
It is providers right to ask for whatever price she wants and it's customer right to publicly express that she's insane for doing this. You agree?
Kora is Suzy from tastes of Seoul (Raleigh, NC)?
Yes, some cars do sell at much higher prices than new -- sometime even late model car when they become very popular and demand outstrips available supply. Wine, art, baseball cards and other things also work this way. But you are right, the prices are not reflecting some pure functional utility value, like getting from point A to point B or getting an alcohol buzz/drunk.
But good to see that you think it's okay for guys to insult an escort just because she thinks her business will do better at a higher price point -- or simply wants to get away from being a "cheap whore" making money for some agency. No surprise here to me though.
Where did I ever say that "it's okay for guys to insult an escort just because she thinks her business will do better at a higher price point"???
Who insulted anyone? Are you equating criticism to insults?
But I forget, you think customers are wallets on legs and can't express their disappointment or unhappiness on a public forum publicly.
Telling someone that their pricing model is "insane" when the criticizing person has no direct financial information or even knows exactly what is being maximized isn't insulting to the person?
But complaining about someone else changing the price to get in the door is not really something others have much to say about other than "That is more than I will pay." And that actually is enough. No need to suggest some mental deficiency just because it's a price one is unwilling to pay. I believe that guy that pointed out everyone has a choice -- one session @ 1K or 3 at about 1K said it best. No judgement or insult to anyone there.
You should probably take a course on what is an insult.
No one suggested any mental deficiency. You are now clinging to words that clearly are used figuratively.
A pricing model cannot literally be insane. A pricing model is neither a person nor a living organism.
Insane prices
Crazy prices
Are they out of their mind with their prices
None of these are actually insults, and all of these are figurative. All of these are routinely used by people everywhere to express disappointment, unhappiness or disgust.
It's telling you had nothing to say when the po actually insulted and berated a monger but here you are screaming when someone says pricing is insane.
Let me guess this is all to protect the seller? A seller that can take your 1k but can't take criticism? Color me surprised. Not.
what you agree with is never insulting or threatening. What you disagree with is always insulting or threatening.
Anyone surprised by the response? I'm not.
Here, I don't use Ai much but I typed
"is saying a price is insаne an insult" in google
This is the first result:
"As a general expression: In informal conversation, people often use "insane" as slang to mean something is extreme, unexpected, or "out of control" (in this case, extrеmely high). In this context, it is usually not intended as a personal insult to a seller, but rather an expression of surprise or an opinion about the market value."
But of course its rocket being unreasonable. Of course.
You have no problem with calling mongers "stupid" on here. Such direct insult is fine by you.
But saying a price model is insane is an insult.
Hey Jensen, repeat with me:
PUBLIC CRITICISM IS OK
Criticizing pricing models Publicly is OK.
Makign a seller uncomfortable with criticism is OK
Expressing disappointment is OK
Negative sentiment is OK
And for the peeps of the other fоrum reading this thread, any and all consumers are free to talk about whichever girl they like as much as they like. That's the point of these boards. To talk about sellers and the business in general. In public.
If the seller can't take public criticism of pricing, maybe the seller isn't cut out for this whole public selling of goods thing.
The seller might want to try low pressure jobs. Ups might be hiring. Onlyfаns I hear might be another job.
-- Modified on 11/22/2025 12:05:47 AM
Prompting is important and the statement of insane was no about the price but about the action raising the to some level.
"Is saying someone raising the price of their service is insane an insult?"
(one of the other google suggested searches is 'how to say the price is too high politely' which doesn't include "that's insane"
Context and Connotation
The word "insane" is subjective in this situation:
As an insult: It can be used to label the person as irrational, foolish, or mentally unstable for making a business decision one disagrees with [1]. In this context, it is a personal attack intended to be demeaning.
As hyperbole/expression of shock: People often use words like "insane," "crazy," or "wild" hyperbolically to express extreme surprise, disbelief, or frustration with a situation, rather than to literally comment on a person's mental health [1]. For example, one might say "The price of gas is insane" to express how high it is, not that the gas itself is literally insane.
Perception: The person hearing the comment may perceive it as an insult regardless of the speaker's intent, as the word "insane" carries historical baggage related to stigmatizing mental illness [1]
largely depends on the context, intent, and relationship between the people involved [1].
Key Considerations
Intent: The speaker's purpose is crucial.
It may be an intentional insult if intended to demean, disrespect, or criticize the person directly rather than the idea itself.
It might be less so if used casually among close friends or as a lighthearted, hyperbolic expression of disagreement without malicious intent [1].
Relationship: The dynamic between individuals heavily influences interpretation.
Close friends or family might use such language without offense, understanding the underlying friendly context.
In a professional setting, or between strangers/acquaintances, it is generally considered disrespectful, inappropriate, and an insult because the language is harsh and unprofessional [1].
Context/Setting:
In a formal environment like a workplace or academic setting, it would likely be deemed an insult and poor communication, potentially violating codes of conduct.
In a casual, private conversation, the impact is different.
Impact: Regardless of intent, if the recipient feels insulted or hurt, the comment has functioned as an insult. The recipient's perception is a primary factor in the interaction [1].
Posing both to Google produced very similar AI responses. So I'll stand by the claim, and note that google seems to support the claim: you are biased in how you read all these situations.
You said
"Telling someone that their pricing model is "insane" "
Yet your prompt asks about calling a person insane.
What a disingenuous fuck you are.
Hey jensen, I can criticize the pricing model all I want without it being an insult to the person.
Pricing model is stupid=>doesnt mean I call the person stupid.
Pricing model is shit =>doesn't mean I call the person shit.
I'm sad I have to spell it out for you but here you are.
A customer has the right to call a pricing model shit.
But you on other hand didn't have an issue with po directly telling customer to go fuck themselves and calling them an idiot. That's fine with you.
Prompting is important and the statement of insane was no about the price but about the action raising the to some level.
"Is saying someone raising the price of their service is insane an insult?"
(one of the other google suggested searches is 'how to say the price is too high politely' which doesn't include "that's insane"
Context and Connotation
The word "insane" is subjective in this situation:
As an insult: It can be used to label the person as irrational, foolish, or mentally unstable for making a business decision one disagrees with [1]. In this context, it is a personal attack intended to be demeaning.
As hyperbole/expression of shock: People often use words like "insane," "crazy," or "wild" hyperbolically to express extreme surprise, disbelief, or frustration with a situation, rather than to literally comment on a person's mental health [1]. For example, one might say "The price of gas is insane" to express how high it is, not that the gas itself is literally insane.
Perception: The person hearing the comment may perceive it as an insult regardless of the speaker's intent, as the word "insane" carries historical baggage related to stigmatizing mental illness [1]
largely depends on the context, intent, and relationship between the people involved [1].
Key Considerations
Intent: The speaker's purpose is crucial.
It may be an intentional insult if intended to demean, disrespect, or criticize the person directly rather than the idea itself.
It might be less so if used casually among close friends or as a lighthearted, hyperbolic expression of disagreement without malicious intent [1].
Relationship: The dynamic between individuals heavily influences interpretation.
Close friends or family might use such language without offense, understanding the underlying friendly context.
In a professional setting, or between strangers/acquaintances, it is generally considered disrespectful, inappropriate, and an insult because the language is harsh and unprofessional [1].
Context/Setting:
In a formal environment like a workplace or academic setting, it would likely be deemed an insult and poor communication, potentially violating codes of conduct.
In a casual, private conversation, the impact is different.
Impact: Regardless of intent, if the recipient feels insulted or hurt, the comment has functioned as an insult. The recipient's perception is a primary factor in the interaction [1].
Posing both to Google produced very similar AI responses. So I'll stand by the claim, and note that google seems to support the claim: you are biased in how you read all these situations.
You missed the point about the google prompts. I suppose I have to spell it out.
Two structurally identical situations but you treat them differently. Structure: someone does something, someone else characterizes the thing done in a non-positive way. Your treat the two cases differently. In one case you claim the person characterizing the the situation is attacking and insulting the actor and assigning that characterization to the person, not the thing done. In the other case you defend to person making the characterization. The only really difference between the two situations is the person that took the action in the first case (that you see as an attack and insulting) is a customer/monger. I the other case the person who took the action is an escort and the person making the characterization is a monger.
That is your selectivity and bias not a fair, impartial treatment. Your actions support that characterization of you.
I've never said what you claim. Everyone should be polite. You on the other hand have said it's fine for a customer to be impolite with a book and the booker should take -- perhaps not the exact quote -- "bend over, take it and ask for another". I don't know how that could understood as anything other than saying it's okay for you monger bros to be rude but not okay for a booker to be rude, or even respond in kind.
As for your last bit above, which I never read before, I'm unaware of the escort ever having made any comments about the threat or otherwise reacted at all to the discussion. The entire discussion has been between among those on the customer side. Was there any point to be made there or just an attempt to defect the discussion on to someone that has not been involved at all?
I never supported that. otherwise it'd be double standards.
But, if the monger was insulted by the booker - for example in the fkg thread (where is it do I need to remake it because I will) the po directly insulted a monger repeatedly when monger wasn't even rude to the Booker. You were nowhere to condemn the situation.
If the booker is being rude insults and berates you, I don't support siting on your ass and taking it. Responding back is an appropritate course of action.
A threаt of pii should never be administered no matter what is said aside from threаt to call the cops on them. Do you not agree that resorting to pii exposal threаt, is akin to a threat of runing your life. A bad review will never ruin anyone's life. A pii exposal will. The same pii lying agencies say they will discard once verified.
Just like with prompts, you said one thing about saying how calling a pricing model crazy is an insult and then made another prompt that called that person insane an insult.
You were dishonest and see no problem with this substitution.
Clients have a right to shit on a pricing model they find unfair bad or ineffective. This whole "insane" word focus is just a bullshit maneuver in order to justify stifling of criticism.
Many are just uncomfortable with public criticism. Well don't read it then. Not for you.
cheap whores. It's insulting.
hard to track the post I was responding to since it's about 16 pages higher up in the Jenson - Rocket great debate.
which is why the scare quotes were used since the claims that she in no way could have deserved the higher price is being so forcefully defended.
That you posted insulting words and tried to distance yourself from that fact by putting them in quotation marks? I didn't notice where anybody else on this thread said those words.
The scare quotes were to indicate those are NOT my words or view. Perhaps the wiki link below will help you.
that said those words in this post? If what you mean to imply is that people who bitch about a providers pricing see them a cheap whores why don't you just say it rather than implying it? Perhaps you "own" what you appear to think.
You really don't have a clue -- or have decided to be intentionally difficult. NO ONE said it. It's was never a real situation. But when I wrote that the hypothetical speaker would have been the escort.:
-- Modified on 11/24/2025 7:59:09 PM
I suggest not arguing with Jensen. He is the one who had no problems calling mongers "stupid" publicly for only reading review grades, but has a problem with people calling a pricing model of a girl crаzy. And have the nerve to call others biased.
He has never criticized a provider publicly, even one he admitted privately he did not have a good time with and was not a good experience. He is perfectly capable of criticizing mongers and advising them but never will he advise anything to a po or a provider. They are perfect and always in the right and always have built in excuse. It is mongers who are in the wrong. And gоd forbid you criticize something or someone on the seller side publicly!
Even though it's literally their job to take criticisms in stride and it's literally pos job to be a customer facing entity that is supposed to be polite.
-- Modified on 11/24/2025 4:12:44 PM
I'm in this hobby to see the girls. I go along I get along. I pick the girls I pick and don't need or ask for booker recommendations. I know the game and accept it for what it is including the YMMV aspect related to any girl or any booker experience at any given time. Having said that, I try stay in my lane. I'm not a booker wannabe. I don't want to come close to shill like behavior. Years ago, I let a girl know I pm'd a guy and blasted him for saying something quite disrespectful in his review (toward the girl and also guys that had reviewed her). She said it was unnecessary, that I was not her pimp. I took that lesson to heart. The girls choose this job (their job, our game) and the shit that goes with it for whatever reason, but there is a line somewhere between being sympathetic and White Knighting.
Stuff that sets you off (which is your truth and can be acknowledged as legitimate criticism of the game) is water off my back. I am perfectly capable of ignoring what you post if I don't care for what you have to say. Some people don't have enough self-control to ignore what you post and may even come across as argumentative "pompous asses" (not my words). Some have accused you of chasing windmills but it's your business to post what you want and it appears you're not banned by bookers. I don't know that Jensen is one that ever specifically called you a Don Quixote. If he did and if the consensus of the peanut gallery is that you are, I would suggest when you two duke it out it's a case of DQ squared.
You might want to compare notes with Rocket. He says I can never say anything bad or negative about the Kgirls. You claim I am calling them something insulting. If "cheap whore" isn't a negative terms -- if one is actually calling someone that (not the case for in my post) -- I certainly don't know what it would be. So which is it? I cannot be both so either you're wrong or rocket is.
You fail to understand I never said you called them cheap whores. I said you are accusing others of seeing them in such light without the balls to actually come out and say it.
Really? That what you were saying in the linked post?
"Please don't call the lesser priced ladies I see"
"cheap whores. It's insulting."
So that was directed at someone else? Seems a bit hard to believe when your follow up to your own post to clarify who it was directed at was: "Comment was directed to Jenson"
I won't bother documenting the rest of the sub-thread. Seems more foolhardy and the agency that tried to rebrand an escort after a bad review by obscuring the face, but otherwise using the same pic, on the same site while leaving the original ad pic up on the same page.
You probably should have taken rocket's advice but since you didn't here is a shovel to dig a bit deeper.
True, I should have done a better job spelling out the meaning of my first post since you weren't sharp enough to understand and because you seem to have little to no sense of humor. It was a sarcastic comment mocking you for throwing up insulting words in a discussion related to insulting behavior.
We all have our blind spots like when I failed to see the ventriloquist's K-girl puppet you created made no sound when you stuck your hand who knows where. She neither dissed her lesser priced "sisters" nor revealed any contempt for a class of monger who thought she was not deserving of the price. And thanks for the offer, but I would have thought by now you'd have seen the shovel I already have is where the dirt raining down on you as I dig my hole (have you used that before, or just copying CDL?).
Seems to understand the humorous aspect of my comment. Unless he's just mocking me.
see or detect any humor in the comment.
Also not mocking you.
I was completely serious, as I thought you were, about using inexpensive when talking about Kgirls.
I got in hassles before with disrespectful haters of Kgirls when they used cheap and other racist/derogatory comments to put them down.
As much as I hate repetitive shit I will repeat what I've said before, and this is all *MY* O & POV, that those people HATE Kmongers so much that they attack the Kgirls.
And the Kgirls are just trying to bring some fun time pleasure to the guys that enjoy it and make a buck like everyone else in the world.
I've always thought of it in terms of high value rather than merely about describing the price.
Anyhow, he would frequently make similar posts as you have and then after a bit would fall back on "I just just making a joke...." You mentor perhaps? Anyhow, maybe you recall the name.
Anyhow, he would frequently make similar posts as you have and then after a bit would fall back on "I just just making a joke...." You mentor perhaps? Anyhow, maybe you recall the name.
Humorous and serious aspect. I'm dead serious about the inappropriateness of your "cheap whore" comment. Those words wouldn't be in this thread if you hadn't put them here. And you put them there when you are schooling guys on how they can have more polite discourse with bookers.
The grasshopper surpasses the master. You mentor will be impressed.
use the term inexpensive!
Yeah, anyone can ask for what they think, whatever they are selling or renting, it's worth.
And people, IMO, have the right to give out any info/opinion on the product or service.
From what I see on the boards and forums there are a lot of newer/uninformed guys that just don't know anything or the history of these Kgirls.
They ask for info for a lot of them, the thing that gets me is that there's a lot of info on the girls out there!
These guys are either lazy or not smart enough to find that info, did a thread quite a while back on this.
So, what I'm getting at is that's who these Kgirls are probably targeting with their increase in donation fee, the new clients.
What I'm getting at is that there are people on the forum who attempt to try to move/divert/shut down the discussion of Koras new pricing policy because it brings up negative sentiment.
And just like our friend Jensen (or noworth on that forum, same person) some people there are extremely averse to public criticism and cannot stand it. And just like with providers who retaliate after negative reviews, these people infringe on customer rights. Don't like people talking negative? Live in your ecochamber. Ignore people who criticize and pretend they don't exist. Stick head in ground, see no evil hear no evil.
But noooo theyd rather tell people to "move on". Who the fuck are they? Mods? No. I'm tired of these shills who themselves had never anything negative to say in their posting career trying to shut down shit just cuz they don't like criticism and negativity.
Instead of merely ignoring this and talking about what they think is important, they have a riveting need to tell others to move on from the topic. Which, by the way, is against that forums rules (discouraging discussion).
So like I've said, I despise shills and white knights. Always worry about the seller, never the buyer.
I deal with the So Cal forums and that's what I was referring to, they were posting about $1000 donation Kgirl, Kora, in the NYC AO. I guess it's all just East Coast chatter.
Why don't you stop lying about what I say and just leave me out of your comments.
I had no problem with those that just said they probably wouldn't pay -- or as one noted the choice is one hour with some girl or one hour each with 3 other girls (though I suppose it could also be 3 hours with some other girl).
Laughable that you want to try saying I'm the selective one when I specifically said that if you are going to say calling what someone did a stupid thing that is insulting them and calling the person stupid then you have to apply that same standard to calling raising a price insane. If saying raising the price is insane is not calling someone insane then saying the things someone did was stupid is not calling the person, but the thing done, stupid. You cannot even come up with your arguments now but steal mine.
FYI
from the other board, someone mentioned she might start doing OF
http://www. usasexguide. nl/forum/showthread.php?36689-Korean-Agency-and-Independent&p=7450034&viewfull=1#post7450034