The unfortunate thing is you can't block aliases. a couple of my stalkers that we're TO'd by TER are back. One is pretty easy to see. He even created a new username specific to my handle. How pathetic and sad of a life do you live that you stalk somebody like that. You can imagine what provides have to put up with that kind of nonsense.
The Ignore feature on TER is nice when it works.
I have a few of the TER trolls on Ignore. It’s amazing how much better life is in the forums when nobody - or almost nobody - is biting on troll bait.
This is really for the DC area guys.
Sela/Ksela, who now goes as Lixa is back in the area. I had the pleasure of meeting with her the other day. Given how things have been recently I would certainly suggest those feeling a bit frustrated by the options in most agency might want to check her out.
To my mind, and even nicer bit is that she an indie who not a touring girl.
I'm not writing a review, just offing a heads up as I think most will find her very fun to meet.
And, it's a much better post than a lot of what has been going on here for a while now.
She's got even more curves now than PC!
Just to reiterate - she IS NOT chubby.
Beautifully curvy!
to Sela's photos? I have seen a Sela and wondered if its the same girl.
I don't think this will be considered a shill thread. You are not recommending or promoting her, just giving a PSA that she has returned to the DC area. Since I have asked for the link, its okay to put it up now if anyone has it.
If you just search for "Sela" on here without any modifiers, hers is the first profile to appear and her website is listed there.
Yep, that's the same Sela I saw around 4 years ago. She was fun, but not exceptional. Just a solid Kgirl experience. If she's better now, I wouldn't mind seeing her again, providing she has not put on more weight. She was near the cut-off line for chubby when I saw her last time.
We'll let her know. I'm sure she will be so, so, so happy to learn!
Most of these girls never forget a tipper, and I tip every girl I see, but telling her CDL might see her again will mean nothing. I'm anonymous with the girls and bookers. Nobody in the biz knows who CDL is in real life, except for a handful of Kgirl mongers I have known for years and have met me in person.
All you have to do is be a tipper and girls take the trouble to remember who you are and what you like? No special org VIP monger recognition required?
And, yes, that is my experience as well. As noted in my earlier comment. Though I’ve never not tipped for a 2 hour session. And I tip for one hour sessions if she’s repeatable. So, I have no way of definitively verifying the difference in treatment for a non-tipper. Other than the comments here from known non-tippers who don’t claim to get that treatment.
-- Modified on 1/25/2021 5:41:56 PM
Yea, she didn't recall any big tippers in LA.
Nor any 60-year old "built" gym rats, successful business men with an IT staff, funny guys in suits, or any other of your personas.
What did jog her memory - sad sack lonely widower who asked creepy personal questions about her business. But even so, just a little.
As unforgettably annoying as CDL is on this forum, it looks like he's pretty forgettable in real life!
Why are you even here? You have seven completely worthless reviews out of eight. The only one that has any value for other mongers is the one where you proved you don't know how to vet a provider and got fucked over by a 50 year old OTHFB. Your Kgirl reviews average six lines and don't contain a single detail that was not previously stated by a reviewer before you. I'm not calling them out as fakes, just that they add nothing of value for other mongers that are considering seeing any of these girls. You might as well just cut and paste the first one you wrote for the rest. Clicking your username shows you have NINE reviews, but only eight show up on your review history. Was one pulled for being a fake, or did you manage to have so LITTLE detail in one that it couldn't even get past moderation?
Now that's why I find YOU annoying. You have a big mouth, but you don't have the cred to back it up. How about something in the next three or four reviews about the girl that was not ALREADY written by someone else? Now, why do you find me annoying, besides for this post, of course? Bwahahahahaha
By the way, CDL does not exist IRL. No one knows who he is. Even at a M & G, the last time I went, I was NOT CDL, I was another username.
We've gone over this before, but I'll repeat myself because you're so dense. TER isn't only about reviews and credibility is something so subjective and ephemeral on this website as to be worthless. You should know by now that not everyone writes a review for each visit, and, what is the value of having many reviews if their "quality" is poor? Unlike you, some of us don't have the time to spend a week writing a single review. You talk about cred, but how can anyone take you seriously when you spout the same sad shit every time about your "wealth" and "experience" when you remain a bigoted and lonely individual? Look no further than your response to my and Kyung's posts. How sad is it that you felt compelled to write an essay just to defend your online persona, which as you claim, has no value in real life?
of having ANY reviews if the quality is so poor they are of no value to anyone else? You want to keep attacking me, but have no explanation why NONE of your reviews bring anything new to the conversation about a particular girl. The only review you wrote that was a home run was the one where you were completely scammed by the provider. The fact that you got scammed at all shows you are not very knowledgeable or EXPERIENCED about the P4P industry. Nevertheless, it was a good DNS review. Sorry you got scammed. I never have. The rest of your reviews are complete drivel. It's interesting that the low-volume keyboard wannabe's here all say they don't review every girl they see. Classic. How about pointing to ONE review of yours that had ANY content that wasn't in a previous review from someone else. Your average review is six lines.
Having been here only 20 minutes, I'm not surprised that you don't understand that TER IS A REVIEW SITE. Its all about reviews. The discussion boards are just an added bonus. Credibility is something that is gained over time, not in the short amount of time you have been here. Since you have no cred, all you can do it attack me personally. You have yet to dispute a single word of information or advice I have given from my own extensive experience with Kgirls. Claiming I am bigoted is about as weak as it gets, but yes, I am bigoted against stupidity, and you keep putting it on display here.
BTW, why don't you want to tell us why your ninth review was pulled? What are you hiding?
-- Modified on 2/1/2021 5:53:47 AM
Did you actually read his DNS review? or equally as importantly did you check out the ads of the OTHFB in question?
I would have to conclude that she didn't mislead him at all. I am sure that you have looked at thousands and thousands of ads and web sites just like I have. Read her ads and tell me if you don't think he got exactly what you would have expected after seeing those nasty pics of an obviously old and overweight woman. I think anyone who booked a session with her after seeing her pics has given up all right to whine about it. UGH, what a fucking beast.
As for the rest of your post, I didn't bother reading any of the rest of his reviews, Quite frankly I am not really interested in the opinions of anyone who would knowingly book with a woman that old, that fat, and that ugly. He and I obviously have nothing in common where it comes to having taste in women.
You knew if you baited me, I would look at her photos. LOL I admit that I never went past the profile he created for TER because I was cautious that I might accidentally see something exactly like THIS!! If anyone here is on a diet, take a look at this woman that Floorhump fucked and tell me if you feel like eating anything. . . . . within the next three days? Is there ANYONE here who would not have turned around and walked away as soon as the door opened? Geesus, I can't believe anyone here is THAT fucking desperate to stick his dick in something this grotesque. And this from the guy who wants to convince us he knows ANYTHING about Kgirls. Bwahahahahaha
Since he was the first reviewer and created her profile, that means he had already seen her photos because he had to provide the ad links in order to review her. This is an object-lesson against bottom-feeding. When you are looking for the lowest price, this is the kind of girl you get. Someone should alert the local zoo that their hippo escaped and got fucked by Floorhump. I wonder if he'll tell us how the DATY was? LOL
I'm not surprised that your perspective on value is so self-centered. You assuredly claim that my reviews are of no value to anyone, and yet, not only are you not in a position to comment on them as we have only seen one provider in common, but the conversations I've had with others about the content of my reviews disputes that notion completely. Then again, we can't prove what has transcribed by that method of communication, so if I say that your reviews are a waste of time because they're long-winded, repetitive and don't disclose any new information, that must be valid too. The fact that I got scammed is a testament to the differences between AMPs and actual providers, but I will freely admit that I was inexperienced. Not everyone has been doing this for 40+ years. For someone who likes to challenge the content of my reviews, I find it interesting that either your reading comprehension is so shit or you didn't bother to do your due diligence that you missed the part of the review in question where I said I didn't do anything aside from a CBJ.
Why are you so fixated with reviews? If you were stripped of all of yours what would remain? I know I'd be content with the interactions I've had with my fellow mongers even if I had nothing to show for it. My review wasn't pulled, the provider's profile was deleted. For someone who claims to be all about them, I'm surprised that you didn't consider that for me to have one more review on my profile than showed up under my reviews, it would've had to have been approved and not removed. If a review is pulled, it won't contribute to your review total.
As we've gone over before, you need to stop repeating yourself. I've challenged the content of your reviews in the past, not just your character, but the latter I did only once before, in response to a bigoted comment you made. I don't recall doing it since even when you've continued to spout that kind of nonsense (I'm sure you'll check, what with all the time you spend on this board). Maybe you should add some notes to help you remember, like you do for your reviews.
to come up with this and its still on the weak side, but this is your justification and it deserves a response.
I don't doubt that there are other newbies who think your five-line reviews are just fine. You may consider mine "long-winded", but I'm writing them for the guys that are looking for girls they can make a "connection" with, not just ones "that can take a pounding.' I give them those insights by including in the narrative some of the interaction between the girl and me, and that necessarily makes the reviews longer. Reviews like yours are essentially all the same and say little more than . . . .
"LFK, DFK BT, shower, preview, BBBJ, DATY, CG, RCG, ACG, mish, doggy, clean-up, shower, leave"
These kinds of generic reviews merely RECITE THE MENU that is ALREADY in the profile, so it leaves the reader with the unanswered question of what happened that made this girl unique or worth choosing over others? How did she react to certain situations, or to something you did or said? If she was shy, what did you do to get her to open up? You should bring the reader into the room with you using details so they experience what you did on a personal level with the girl. For every one of my reviews, I have gotten feedback from other Kgirl mongers who said they subsequently saw the girl based on my review, and she was exactly as I described her. The fact that other Kgirl fans are having good experiences based on my reviews is the reason I write them. I would argue that the short generic reviews like yours are from self-centered mongers. Its more about sucking down the free VIP than informing other mongers of what to expect from a girl you saw.
As far as your being scammed, it was not the first girl or two that you saw, it was one of the more recent. I see 12-15 indies a year, but none have ever looked like the ones that you saw, and I have never been scammed. I have not been in this scene for 40+ years, although there are some that have. The fact that you went through with the session with the "beast", whether it was CBJ or anything else, just highlights your lack of experience. I have been seeing Kgirls for about 12 years, but I have been high volume since day one, which means I have seen over 900 unique girls, and have repeated with about 75%.
You claim to have challenged the content of my reviews, but then say we only have one girl in common, so what was your basis of challenging reviews of girls you have NOT seen? How are you uniquely qualified to challenge my reviews of girls you have not even seen? I am not "fixated" on reviews, but TER is, by their own definition, a review site. They are the grande dame of all review sites. Having written about 800 Kgirl reviews between the two sites I have reviewed on, and having read over 150,000 reviews on TER, I think I AM in a position to say what your reviews lack. Other mongers have posted on the board that they have seen or chose not to see, Kgirls based on my reviews. You claim that others have told you "privately" that your reviews are good, but I don't recall anyone ever posting on the Kgirl board positive feedback about your reviews. Did you just make that that up? Cred here is all about experience and establishing your bona fides as someone knowledgeable about Kgirls. You haven't seen nearly enough to get past the newbie/wannabe stage. Sorry, it is what it is.
Always come here dripping with bitterness and jealous of those of us that do. We are mostly older guys who perfected their game in the 70's, 80's, and 90's when seducing women in one night and taking them home to fuck that same night was pretty common. It was the era of the one-night stand and you needed some serious seduction skills to be successful at it. it was pre-internet, pre-dating apps and pre- low end matchmaking services. Younger guys have all of these tech tools and still can't get laid without paying. We pay now because we're older. What's your excuse? I was 48 the first time I paid for pussy, because I still wanted to fuck 20-somethings, and by then, I had bedded over 2000 women. Have you had sex with anyone or anything other than your hand without paying?
Your only resort is to denigrate those of us who have social skills and are living the good life by fabricated personal attacks rather than improving yourself by developing your own social skills. Look, sonny, you CAN'T be me. Get over it. It must really suck to be you. How can you be so bitter because you can't get women to like you at such a young age? If you're a dick with me, you're probably a dick with them, too. Time for some introspection.
There are hundreds of big tippers in LA. There are a lot of buffed guys in the hobby, although apparently you're not one of them, as well as guys in suits and guys who own their own businesses. My profile as a hobbyist is certainly not unique. If you think seeing three or four kgirls a week, plus having a Kgirlfriend I'm doing overnights with once a week makes me a lonely widower, my hat goes off to you. If you're doing that much better than me, why don't you have a ton of reviews since you joined TER? Are you short on income, or what? You should have a $600 stimulus check coming, so maybe you can get laid. I don't qualify for stimulus. So you're not a tipper, you're not buffed, you don't have enough money to be high volume, and you have no social skills with women in general? No wonder you're dripping with jealousy and bitterness. I would be the same way if I were you. You sound just like BLRPOS. Is he your new butt-buddy? Bwahahahahahaha
A haiku for CDL...
...for your gratuitous mention of me:
I'm not in this thread
but very much in your head
Will be 'til you're dead.
--A Fuck You Haiku
I'm only surprised that GaG didn't jump in first with "Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice"
Actually, I'm not surprised - he's an admitted alcoholic. His brain is so addled by alcohol that he thinks every time he posts it, it's the first time. LOL!
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-385985?frmSearch=1#385985
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-385393?frmSearch=1#385393
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-365803?frmSearch=1#365803
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-350786?frmSearch=1#350786
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-lol-340134?frmSearch=1#340134
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-265595?frmSearch=1#265595
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-lol-eom-243611?frmSearch=1#243611
https://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-238479?frmSearch=1#238479
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/bettlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-216876?frmSearch=1#216876
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/now-youve-done-it-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-212787?frmSearch=1#212787
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-960600?frmSearch=1#960600
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-lol-952285?frmSearch=1#952285
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-919020?frmSearch=1#919020
https://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-892242?frmSearch=1#892242
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-845192?frmSearch=1#845192
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-688854?frmSearch=1#688854
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-eom-654724?frmSearch=1#654724
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/beetlejuice-beetlejuice-beetlejuice-637383?frmSearch=1#637383
I just won a bet that if I mentioned you, you would show up. Whatever you said, I'm sure it had nothing to do with Kgirls.
I'd like to share a synopsis of his comments with you, but I blocked him too!
The Ignore feature on TER is nice when it works.
I have a few of the TER trolls on Ignore. It’s amazing how much better life is in the forums when nobody - or almost nobody - is biting on troll bait.
The unfortunate thing is you can't block aliases. a couple of my stalkers that we're TO'd by TER are back. One is pretty easy to see. He even created a new username specific to my handle. How pathetic and sad of a life do you live that you stalk somebody like that. You can imagine what provides have to put up with that kind of nonsense.
The Ignore feature on TER is nice when it works.
I have a few of the TER trolls on Ignore. It’s amazing how much better life is in the forums when nobody - or almost nobody - is biting on troll bait.
I’m fully aware that there are people with various mental and/or emotional pathologies who see nothing wrong with harassing others while hiding behind an alias. And I’m very sorry you are having to deal with this situation.
Not infrequently these people are highly narcissistic. They live in fear of being ignored. This drives them to fabricate conspiracy theories and to look for opportunities to create conflict where no valid reason for such exists. They will do anything to feed their need for attention.
I understand how toxic these people can be. Hang in there.
You haven't truly "made it" on the internet until you have your very own stalker. lol
I have and have had countless stalkers over the years and several of them weren't content with stalking me just here on TER but have crossed over into my real life and attempted to do me harm IRL too. It is what it is, I don't really lose any sleep over it. I look at my life, which quite frankly is pretty great and then I look at theirs and I know for a fact that I have won whatever battle they think they are fighting with me.
You're in a better place than most, GaG. I knew a provider IRL and would see her at the store frequently, but would just walk by as she had her kid with her. On our dates, we would talk about it. She was like WTF is wrong with guys? I'm with my kid (8 years old), and guys are asking or saying very rude or sexually explicit things to her. She would thank me for being respectful.
We joke and kid, but there is a very dark side to the business.
JFC, that is way too long to read.
You really have too much lonely time on your hands to type so many words on TER.
not a big deal time-wise. So I see you have no excuses, denials or substantive arguments to refute my post. Thanks for tacitly admitting my points. This personal attack is your weakest yet. Are you trying to beat out Floorhump to be biggest joke on the Kgirl board? Another classic newbie move is to claim you didn't read it when you've got no comeback. You're not very good at this are you? Bwahahahaha
Well, at 70 WPM, it is no wonder you type and type and type and type....
I haven't thought about typing speed since my 9th grade computer class - but you do you, big boy.
That's your big comeback? So you haven't thought about typing speed since LAST YEAR? Is that your story? You're making this so easy, I'm embarrassed for you. LMAO
Your comeback is to say that I'm in 10th grade? Really?
I *know* you are an old, lonely widower who has too much time on his hands, no social life, and such an empty spot in his soul that you parade and strut on an f'in monger board because that is all you have.
You literally have so little going on in your life that you brag about your typing speed to defend the amount of time that you are wedded to an f'in monger board.
And your joke is that I'm a 10th grader???
It's really funny. Your response is so pathetic it brought a smile to my face!
So thank you for that. Please do more.
younger guy with no game with women in general. Your idea of a hot night is to watch a little internet porn and rub one out, hoping your parents don't hear you moan as you shoot your load. But, hey, what's the change they will be listening intently for the whole three minutes? You have three reviews in the past four months, so you're not seeing nearly enough women to stay off the masturbation merry-go-round. Young guys like you don't see hookers unless they have no game at all with women. Your vocabulary and syntax show you to be mid-to-late 20's. You could be older, but it doesn't show in your maturity. You probably still live with your parents, maybe even working in the family business. You work a lot of hours at a relatively low wage and that's why you don't have the ability to participate here more often, so you denigrate those of us that are financially stable as being lonely and old because we have the luxury of spending more time hanging here with the other high-volume Kgirl lovers. I will cop to old, but as I said recently, if seeing three Kgirls a week, PLUS dating a top-tier Kgirl OTC as her RL boyfriend is "lonely" by your definition, then kudos to you for being such a stud by comparison. Bwahahahaha
So why don't you have more reviews then? BTW, I'm relieved you were able to do the math to get my 10th grade poke.
You THINK you know be, but only four guys four guys from this board met me in person. They have seen the photos of my OTC life with the Kgirls, and they are collectively laughing their asses off at you and your speculation.
idiot who equates number of reviews with number of women fucked. You do it all the time. You have no game so you use the same stupid metric over and over.
You say to kyungjean: "You have three reviews in the past four months, so you're not seeing nearly enough women to stay off the masturbation merry-go-round." Your mentor, GaGAMBLER, has ZERO reviews in 15 years, eight months on TER. By your standards, GaG has been on the masturbation merry-go-round so long that he can't walk because he's so dizzy from going round and round. Or is the reason he can't walk is that he's a "binge and functional (sic) alcoholic?"
Another one of your weak attempts at an insult is to call someone "young" and claim he lives with his parents as you also did to kyungjean. And how can you tell he's young? Because you claim you can analyze his "vocabulary and syntax." Thank you Sherlock Holmes. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
When rocket was new to posting here and dared to disagree with you, tried to insult him by saying he was young and had "millennial hubris."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/this-is-typical-millennial-hubris----18368?frmSearch=1#18368
You really need some new material besides saying someone is young or has no reviews. Along with your ad hominem attacks, it makes you look like a pathetic loser.
Doesn't mention Kgirls even once. You keep proving I still own you.
read my post even though you claim you have me on 'Ignore'. Your bullshit is so transparent. You keep proving I still own you.
Lunar New Year is coming up - here's a date idea for you and your "RL top-tier girlfriend".
Take her to your house, show off your IBM electric typewriter and bang out some love sonnets to her at 70 WPM!
PS - if you had four "friends" on this board, don't you think they would be defending you???
my handle to CDL in 2015. One of my friends under the other handle told somebody in a PM who I was and it got back to some Kgirls, and they all started texting me day and night, so I shut down that handle and started CDL after 7 years on TER. I'll be in Chinatown tomorrow night and then on to Ktown WITH the Kgirl I'm dating. This is your chance to stalk me IN REAL LIFE. If you recognize the Kgirl, then you will know who I am.
Why are you so obviously jealous that I date Kgirls on the outside, and you can't get the time of day from them because you have no social skills? I'll tell you what I'll do, if you can get ANY Kgirl to go out with you, take a photo proving you did it and I'll give you a little more respect. As a jealous wannabe, you're just s troll here. HInt . . . . Kgirls don't usually go out with guys who still live with their mommy and daddy, so good luck taking my challenge. LOL
Most likely I would help the poor little weakling back up to his feet, dust him off, but then if he chose to take a swing at me too, I'd bitch slap him myself, 98 pound weakling or not. lol But since I don't really like picking on the weak, I wouldn't use a closed fist like I would when hitting a grown ass man. Which is why my bitch slap of you is so mild.
Well, if Jensen says those pics are from two years ago and you saw her 4 years ago and she was near your cutoff line for chubby, something ain't adding up then.
Because she's slender as hell in those pics. This makes me think those slender body pics have nothing to do with her.
I'll probably go ahead and say people should just discard those Sela pics and treat them as fake.
Take Lixas pics as a baseline. At least two years ago and probably untrue to her body even then = unreliable and useless pics to present day mongers.
And Sela, if you're reading this, you probably should consider updating those pics.
years ago. I never said they were the same pics, because they aren't, but the ones on the link are clearly the same girl to me. The fact that she has updated her photos does not mean she is unrecognizable. A lot of girls change their pics and we can still tell who they are.
I think you missed my point entirely.
Let me explain. You said that she was near your cut off point for being chubby/fat.
So this led me to believe that these pics of her body-wise are fake if they were made around that time that you saw her. Especially considering she's chubby right now. When I say fake, it doesn't mean another person. It means theyre so far removed from the truth and enhanced so much, they might as well be someone else's.
I don't personally think the term chubby applies at all. That suggests things like muffin tops over the pants or a bit of a gut or "junk in the trunk" type body.
What she has is a soft body -- evenly distributed body fat but still in good enough proportions to say better than "average".
Personally I think CDL is talking shit with his "near the cutoff" given other cases where he's said the girl was chubby but since I didn't see her 4 years ago when she was on the west coast maybe she's changed. We don't pics for that I don't think, and generally women don't get thinner as they age (but perhaps she never worked on her diet before and has since then).
thx, I was approved but cancelled the last min due to my office schedule in late 19', was still interested in seeing her but took her out from my list totally because of CDL's "near the cutoff" comment. Guess I'll go to see her next week to find out myself.
(I did meet her once years ago when she first visit DMV with CP, kind of remember that she was my preferred type, but that's years ago)
"near the cutoff" WHEN I SAW HER 4 years ago. Why not PM someone who has seen her recently? That's what I would do rather than rely exclusively on a 4-year-old impression.
Just remember that we all have our own preferences when it comes to looks. Your preferred type may be the same thing that I consider chubby. You may find my "perfect" body type too skinny for your tastes. There is nothing wrong with us each preferring girls with different body types. That's why there is a market for girls who have different looks.
I don't talk shit about Kgirl. Some people think I'm too lenient in some of my assessments because I don't like hurting a girl's business. There are customers for chubby girls. Some post on this board. I'm just not one of them. Many guys that are not on the West Coast have a lower standard because they have learned to "settle" for what they can get. I understand that, but I have to view girls compared to what else is here in SoCal, not by what the worldwide Kgirl market is like. For me, chubby is a girl who is not slender. I have attached a link below to a girl who's body is perfection for me. If you put 20 pounds on her, she might still be very attractive to most guys, but I would still have to describe her as a bit chubby. 20 pounds is adding 20% to her weight. That would be like me adding 40 pounds. There's no way I can do that without looking chubby to most people, except with steroids, and I don't go there.
-- Modified on 2/4/2021 9:25:15 AM
Well in this case sounds like you did call it as you saw it and did not try to go back on it like you did with Heri.
As a result, you DID save KlientDMV some doucats - and inadvertently did end up hurting her business.
In this case, you did the right thing tho and saved a monger a trip he might have regretted. Kudos.
is chubby as hurting her business. Like I said, there is a market for chubby girls and many of them do alright in spite of a few extra pounds. Its just that the market does not include me. I see just as many reviews for guys who are looking for curvy girls with a large butt as I do for girls that look like Amber.
Preventing some people from seeing a girl who they'd otherwise see is taking business away,by definition.
When monger decides to not see the girl he keeps the money and girl loses the money.
on a single review without knowing the preferences of the reviewer is just asking for disappointment, IMO. I would NEVER have canceled a girl I was thinking of seeing without reading multiple reviews and PM'ing the guy who's reviews I'm giving more weight too. If he had PM'd me, I would have told him that I prefer girls that are skinny to slender, and THAT is standard by which I would find a more robust-looking girl to be "chubby."
Or perhaps cheated him out of a good session. If he does decide to go see her he can tell us if it was worth it, if he wished he kept his money or if he wished he made the appointment sooner.
How could he have been "cheated" if cdls story is honest and true?
I don't get it. You keep saying that it's on mongers if they make the wrong choice, yet you still use specific diction such as "cheated" like cdl said something misleading. If someone tells their side of the story and it is honest and true, it fulfills the informed decision thing. Where exactly is the cheating?
First, CDL is making a claim based on an event 4 years in the past. He is also using terminology that I think is misleading for most in this case. I think what I have said previously makes my though process pretty clear to anyone reading.
You claimed CDL saved KlientDMV from wasting his money. Why is that? Unless KlientDMV agrees with what CDL seems to be claiming -- that picture in the link he provided is not chubby so anyone with more fat than that is chubby -- it is far from clear he will not have a good time and be very happy having seen Lixa.
Like I said, he seems to be rethinking a visit so if he does go we can actually get an answer on the claim you made -- of course he might also just decide he has much better things to do that get involved in this discussion.
But she does have recent reviews now and none seem to think she is chubby. The new review is from someone that gave a 2 in performance to one provider so one might expect some level of honesty from him. I've also seen a number of the girls he's reviewed and generally agree with his assessment. So I think it reasonable to conclude that anyone listening to CLD's description of chubby from 4 years back and decides to go elsewhere may well be missing out. And note, of the three of us I am the only one who has seen her recently. You have not even mentioned ever seeing her so you're really just making claims based on hearsay. You do seem to do that a lot.
thx, jensen, as you stated that
1. I was originally not planning to see her because of CLD's comment.
2. Now since you clarified her info, I'd put her back to my list and plan to see her
I'll find time for Lixa between my regular J visit and current desirable K, maybe not next week, but definitely I'll go meet her soon, then come back to compare notes.
I never said cdl saved him from wasting money.
I said he saved him some money because he didn't spend any money and also said
"saved a monger a trip he might have regretted."
Notice the words "might have"?
I never stated that he would regret it. I never made that claim.
I said that as long as cdl said the truth, another monger would be able to make a much more informed decision.
Yes, I haven't seen her. I asked you about her pics, and I got the answer from you that she's far removed from those pics (it's obvious,because in two sets we see different bodies- and the new body depicted is far chubbier than old pics)
And cdl has talked about how she is near cutoff of his chubby line.
How was cdls talk misleading? He says if a girl is fat, she is fat to him. Are you saying he is lying?
Everything I got about this girl was from your and cdls report. And that's a lot of info to make an informed decision. I assume both yours and cdls info is honest and true.
You are now trying to depict cdl as someone who misled because of "terminology". What, he didn't sugar coat chubbyness?
No, no one was "cheated" out of anything here. People look at reviews and make decisions based on them.
Nice selective editing on your part and misstating my short statement EXACTLY as you accuse me of doing. But what was your concluding remark about CDL's post:
"In this case, you did the right thing tho and saved a monger a trip he might have regretted. Kudos. "
No ambiguity there at all. Better to encourage others not see someone because they might regret it as if missing out on seeing a good provider is perfectly fine, EVEN when your information is from 4 years in the past.
However, someone that is suggesting the local guys check her out after having very recently met with her is somehow a problem for you. I get you seem to think only pointing out the bad is what is valuable to anyone but the reality is most of us want to hear about who we SHOULD be seeing not who to avoid. Keeping our money is not what we want -- we want the good times and playful session. In fact, I suspect most of us here would much prefer to reliably hear who is good to see rather than who not see because we DON'T get much from leaving our money in the bank or spending on some less valued activity.
But you continually want to rain on anyone's parade who wants to share good news. While I don't retract the TATTT label I will just say we should all just start calling you Debbie Downer or perhaps suspect you just suffer from an optirectalrefractive disorder (where your optic nerve is actually connected to you asshole so you always have a shitty view of life).
(And an aside, I agree that CDLs comment DID steer people away which was why a said he was talking shit. His review is clearly one saying others should expect to have a good session and would not be wasting their money. His only point was he has very strong preferences for fitness -- he is a gym rat after all -- but clearly that 8/8 and all the positive comments suggest a review supporting the choice to see her. His comment was, intentionally or unintentionally, was a different tone.)
Maybe even the week.
He well and truly nails the description of one of the most prolific troll posters on this board. And does it with far more patience than I have left for his target. Along with a good deal of wit.
I’m still chuckling over “optirectalrefractive disorder”
Well done.
You, sir, are obsessed with me. You claim to ignore me, yet you still read my posts and half your posts are about me. I've had mongers contact me and say I'm nearly the only thing you talk about to them as well.
I don't deserve this much attention. For your own health and sanity, maybe think about some other things.
But you can do whatever you wish, just a friendly suggestion.
Judging by the speed with which it showed up, I’m guessing the single most prolific purveyor of misinformation on this forum took offense at my appreciation for Jensen’s post.
But, back to the topic of my reply, I still think Jensen’s reply was brilliant.
-- Modified on 2/6/2021 5:40:24 PM
You’re exactly correct. The sooner guys stop engaging with the little rocket fella the less we’ll have to listen to his repetitive and negative rants.
"Negative rants" is a tautology.
The sooner people who want to depict girls or entities who provide them, in a better light than they really are, stop engaging with me, the more room I will have.
More room to present accurate info, expose incorrect factual info and photography that truthfully reflects their current features. That's all I really ask for. The ability to present actual info without embellishment for mongers, no matter what the consequence for the girl/org. To have such ability without some folks trying to discredit such info.
Instead of trying to justify your bad behavior, maybe you could just post a picture of yourself in your superhero costume 🤮🤮🤮
"Bad behavior"? Expressing truth and calling spade a spade is bad behavior?
It's really simple. If you try to make a girl appear better than she really is, be prepared for truth to come out. This includes age appearance, services and anything else.
If she gets less business because of truth being told, GOOD. Because if she gets less business after truth came out this means that concealing some truth made people who'd otherwise not see her have they known the full truth, see her.
Sorry, but cry me a fucking river if you like lies over truth.
As far as superhero costume, I don't have one. Capt save a hoes do tho. You should ask them.
I'm a bit curious about just who in this thread is guilty of Rocket's charges:
"If you try to make a girl appear better than she really is, be prepared for truth to come out. This includes age appearance, services and anything else."
In addition to who needs to be on trial in this thread, just what the the actual evidence that Rocket used to support the charge?
I believe I already stated this:
"I'll be 100% honest with you here - yes, I think you're trying to make the girl appear better than she is by discrediting cdls opinion of her. If I'm wrong, then you will hear an apology from me first thing. In fact, I'd be very glad to be wrong. You've already proven me wrong once by sticking up for a swindled monger in the other thread, and I couldn't be happier."
You then doubled down and called me out as omeone who rains on parades, while also effectively insuniating that younger girls should be having preferential treatments of some sort when it comes to the truth.
The evidence I collected was from both you and cdl - we've established that one set of her pics is bogus as we also established that 4 years ago she was also borderline chubby by cdl standards.
You could've easily left it at that, as it is the truth. Yet you felt the need to call out cdls evaluation as bs. And cdl is very, very lenient on kgirls, as evidenced by him going easy on Heri
1. No one actually established anything about the "bogus" picture you seem to be worked up about. I said the one was probably 2 years old at least but that was her ad from when when she was based in NY if pay any attention. We've never seen the pics CDL saw (to any of our knowledge) when she worked in LA. This is you just displaying a massive case of confirmation bias.
2. I did not attempt to "discredit" CDL's opinion of her. I did take exception to the appearance that he seemed to want to dispute my recent experience and assessment with information from 4 years ago and that he did induce someone to change their prior view of wanted to see a girl that had been on his radar for about a year it seems. I also noted that the general tone/implication of he post was at odds with his review, that clearly was a "see her in my opinion, you'll likely enjoy unless you *must* have a spinner/athlete toned body" review. If you doubt that just read his review. However, here is the relevant section:
"Was greeted by a medium height good-looking girl in very high heels, which when combined with her curvy body, made her look about 20 pounds larger than she really was. Once she stepped out of the heels in the bedroom, *my perception of her heftiness disappeared completely*, and I was left looking at a 5-5, curvy girl with a round, rather than a flat, behind. If you like curves, this is your girl. I prefer a little thinner, but that's just my taste." [emphasis added with asterisks]
Note, not one mention of chubby.
3. Your "evidence" is purely hearsay and you lack any objective basis for drawing the conclusion you did.
In other words, you've again pushed a discussion in which you are completely ignorant of the facts -- you have NEVER seen the girl in question -- due to your TATTT disorder.
I would say that is well described as bad behavior as we've all been trying to get past this hobby horse of your. So perhaps if you don't actually have an facts to offer in a discussion and just voice an opinion stop pushing YOUR vacuous argument to the right side of the page.
Are you guys really fighting over a 2017 review? Lol
The argument is has about how rocket seems to think he has a clue and is calling BS on my OP where I suggested the DMV guys might find a provider a clear improvement over a lot of what we've been getting here. He has never seen the girl but wanted to rely on CDL's comment which was a perhaps poorly worded as it seemed that he was saying "stay away" even though he wrote a review 4 years ago and gave an 8/8 rating.
In other words, rocket will grasp at any straws he can to try accusing me of being anti-monger and trying to steer business to girls by falsely representing them.
Here's what I said:
"Sela/Ksela, who now goes as Lixa is back in the area. I had the pleasure of meeting with her the other day. Given how things have been recently I would certainly suggest those feeling a bit frustrated by the options in most agency might want to check her out. "
Feel free to make your own decision on who is trying to blow smoke up anyone's ass.
That is false - how can I call your op bs if I use it as a starting point for my argument?
Nowhere have I called your op bs,nor do I think it's bs. I believe your rec is honest and truthful.
Until cdl chimed in, I was pretty content with figuring out one of her pic set was out of date.
Once cdl chimed in, I realized that set is pretty bogus and extremely out of date.
When cdls new info causes a guy to reconsider, I said it's good because knowing new info empowers mongers.
Note that until that point I didnt have any issues whatsoever with your line in this thread.
The issue I've had is after this point, because you discredited cdls info and said a monger can be cheated by him.
Please, get it correct.
CDL made a comment that was really not reflective of his review of four years past, or at least interpreted by at least two (your and Klient) in a way that is not really consistent with that review and yet it was made as if it actually was relevant to the discussion now. Pointing that out is not "discrediting" someone; nor is calling that "talking shit" discrediting anyone. CDL himself said no one should pay attention to 4 year old information (the talking shit statement was about about the relevance of the dated experience) You claimed CDL's comment "saved" a monger from making a big mistake and spending his money. I pointed out that is far from the only conclusion and likely not even correct. If a comment like that did induce someone from seeing something that would have actually enjoyed seeing then that comment did "cheat" someone from a good time.
You have NEVER seen the woman in question but assert a lot of "facts" about the situation.
In short, you are talking from ignorance and bias. For you, it is always better to assume the worst and trust a negative accusation (which was apparently not actually CDL's intent here). Then you seek to create some "evidence" in your mind about how any positive statements are deception. Then try to convince others that the claimed deception true.
Your logic is really faulty.
You accused me of saying that your op is bs. I never said it, and I'm willing to say that again - I believe your original post was a truthful, honest and fair recommendation.
Now you say you got it correct, no you did not. I never called your op untruthful or bs.
I've said many times I did not see this woman, and this doesn't make my point any less valid. Nowhere have I claimed that Ive seen her. You told me yourself that one set of photos is two+ years old. And cdl chimed in with the rest.
You also got it incorrect that I said cdls comment saved a monger from making a big mistake - I've never said that in my life. I said the new info saved a monger a trip he might have potentially regretted,based on his values. The funny thing is - after seeing whose alias he is, I think there's a very good chance he's seen this girl before. He's quite a prolific monger.
I did not claim any deception of sort. The only thing I claimed is you trying to discredit cdls opinion (which you did, even saying so much as some girls he considered chubby were not chubby) and that her pics are so old they should be thrown away and disregarded (confirmed by you and cdl).
The only reason I used cdls opinion, just like I used your pal guards dogs opinion in other thread, is that because any time I vocie an opinion you attack my credibility. So I want to see how far you will go to try to make girls/orgs ook better and downplay the impact. You went sort of far here, I didn't expect you to throw cdl ls opinion under the bus for this Edelweiss girl.
Yes, you did find me! However, also many long time DMV fellow hobbyists and our little back channel chatting members know both my handle and this alias, especially if you know what "Klient" mean. Even local PO's know I'm using both names for reviews. I'm using alias for other personal reason.
Anyway, back to this particular topic /girl/Lixa,
1. thx for all info, good and bad
2. I did meet the girl once 4 / 5 yrs ago when she first time visit DMV, and planned to see her again.
3. due to my personal preference, no heavier than 120lb, plus CDL's chubby comment, I did delist her from my list.
4. then decided to give her another try after Jenson clarification.
Life is too short, I'm typically spending more time w girls than arguing here. Move on and have some fun!
Stay Safe & Best, 5Q
Well said.
Life is far too short to miss out on a potentially nice or even great experience. Enjoy!
Thanks for the post. Always good to know my research is producing correct results 
May I ask - and you're certainly under no obligation to answer this - but does the fact that local POs know both of your alias change the way you conduct public reviews and/or public discussions? As opposed to backchannel discussions?
no, as i mentioned using alias for personal reason, not hiding from girls/POs/others.... I started w/ other few handles years years ago, wrote too many and get bored about it. Retired most of them except these two! It's too boring hearing about me. Have more fun w/ girls!
Sorry, maybe I wasn't too clear about my question,I meant... does the fact that pos know who you are, influence your review writing of girls who work for them? Ie, you are less inclined to write negative reviews or less inclined to be as critical you otherwise would be on a backchannel/private group?
Because skimming through your public reviews, seems I can only find positive reviews for kgirls. Maybe I did not look as thoroughly as I should have tho.
-- Modified on 2/17/2021 2:00:11 AM
Yes, I've passed the time when writing/posting good or bad reviews. Now only write for pleasure, for friends or serve other purposes. However, typically if I do have an average or below average session, I'd first report it back to POs, then back channel to our group to share the feedback.
OK, thanks for the honest answer.
And as I am sure you have noticed, all of them tend to have the same participants. lol
Lets see if this one reaches the absolute far end of the page. I wouldn't bet against it.
BTW I have no idea what these guys are arguing about, they don't really seem to need much of a reason. lol
👍
Obviously you have never been to the P&R board.......😅
and I can't remember a single thread going completely off the right side of the page like we have had here, where the final post was so far to the right of the page that only a single letter could fit on each line making the last post completely vertical. lol
Check out this thread as an example
It seems you're unable to follow my reasoning, so again here are the facts:
1. You've said that set pics of her is at least two years old. Meaning, these pics arent recent or representative of her appearance over last two years. You also mentioned she is curvier now, just like her new set of pics (under different name) show.
2. cdl has stated that he saw her four years ago, and she did not look like that set of pics even though she was recognizable, and that she was borderline chubby according to his evaluation.
These are facts,and not opinions.
Now, the conclusion.
Whether or not she used those pics four years ago is nearly irrelevant. The relevant portion here is that the chance of her looking like slender her in pics over the last four years is pretty much nil. Hence, those pics aren't representative and should be considered bogus or way over four years old.
Back to your attempt to discredit cdls opinion. I almost guarantee you, that if cdls evaluation was in line with your rec, you would have no issues him bringing up his four year old experience. But as it somehow contradicted it and caused someone to reconsider (rightfully so - because new info has surfaced), you took offense to it. This is my opinion, yes.
I don't get what me not seeing the girl had anything to do with anything. I never claimed I've seen her nor have I claimed anyone should or should not see her.
All I want is truthful and correct info to be distributed. Those pics are either 5+ years old (best case scenario) or are bogus altogether,a conclusion you can make if you assume your and cdls info are correct.
You getting annoyed that someone had second thoughts about a girl when they learned some new info on her, is amusing. You attacking cdls credibility isn't..
You are welcome to call me whatever you want. Yes, I'm a cynical person and a pessimist. I'm the opposite of someone like twoon.
The main thing for me is to be able to call bullshit when I see it.
Those pics are bullshit. And I've called them bs. Another form of bs is you trying to discredit cdls opinion and claiming it somehow "cheated" anyone when you yourself say it's always up to monger to make good decisions and have constantly asked me "bu bu what is the impact" each time I'd point out a lie.
I did not misstate anything you've said, I directly quoted your sentence.
I never want to rain on anyone's parade. I want to give all mongers as much info to make an informed decision as possible. Truthful info. True info people might withhold from their reviews or minis or whatnot as to not impact the girl or whatever their reasoning.
You can cut off my balls if I ever spread false info.
With that said, I did my research, and I think KlientDMV is an alias of someone who hardly needs any advice from cdl or even you.
Edit: I said kudos to cdl only because he's known and himself said he does not like to talk negatively about kgirls on forums, only in reviews. In this case, he stood by his assessment on the forums. And, at least initially, appeared to have a hand in a decision to not see the girl. Hope I explained it properly.
-- Modified on 2/6/2021 6:50:04 PM
except for one thing, Jensen. I said nearly a week ago that the current photos she is using are NOT the same ones she used four years ago, but they are close enough that I recognize her as the same girl I saw back then. My comments on how she looked four years ago is a snapshot in time, and I, in no way, suggest that its a fact that she looks the same now. I don't know. Unless there is someone else who saw her then, and saw her now who wants to weigh in with their own OPINION, I don't think its wise for anyone to make a decision to see her or not now based on how she looked four years ago. These Kgirls often go up and down, sometimes by a 25-30 pound swing in less than a year. I saw her FOUR years ago.
Maybe you have missed my convo with Jensen beforehand. I asked him why she has two sets of pics where the body is depicted drastically different. His response was, I quote (in the fear of being called out for misquoting) :
"I am pretty sure the Sela pic are from at least 2 years ago. The Lixa pics are current and very much her."
If you look at pics, lixa pics are a lot curvier than the Super slender Sela pics.
Now, if you, cdl, saw her four years ago and thought she's near cut off for chunky. And now Jensen saw her and says her Liza pics are like her...what is the probability of her looking like her Sela body pics anytime in the last five years? To me, it's near nil. Those pics are near useless in determining what she is like today. Even Jensen said they're old.
Again, nowhere am I denigrating her or saying she's bad. She can be an excellent and good looking provider for all I know. I Just want the truth to be known and not embellished. These pics are not a good representation of her body now, and they werent when cdl saw her. So what's the point of these pics? Exactly.
And jensen trying to discredit cdls opinion is just.... wrong to me unless there's clear examples of him being very off with girls jensen seen.
-- Modified on 2/5/2021 5:12:13 PM
That's why I clarified that NEITHER set of pics he referred to are the ones she was using when I saw her. He said there are currently two sets that he knows of, and one set is TWO years older than the other. The pics I saw, which is neither of these sets, was four years ago.
Everyone here is entitled to their own opinion about her body. Mine is based on seeing her four years ago and how she looked to me THEN. I have not seen her lately, so I have no opinion on how she looks now. Jensen's opinion that I am wrong about how she looked four years ago is based on . . . . . . . . . well, I'm not sure what its based on. Maybe he can tell us.
-- Modified on 2/5/2021 5:45:59 PM
"Jensen's opinion that I am wrong about how she looked four years ago is based on . . . . . . . . . well, I'm not sure what its based on. Maybe he can tell us."
I think that is a misreading. I never said anything about you being wrong about how she looked four years ago.
What I said was, I thought the general tone of your post was less positive than your review (and did produce a negative reaction). I also said that your comment really didn't add information as your experience was so old -- so why even bother saying anything?
But, as you note yourself your experience from 4 years ago is really dated and not really relevant to today. No one was claiming others should see her based on pics from 4 years ago. However, you felt the need to weigh in, and in a way that raised questions about my recommendation and induced one person we know of to take her off his radar (at least temporarily). That is why I said you were talking shit on this.
He weighed in on his experience 4 years ago and defended his stance since then.
His experience was in no way dismissive of your recommendation. It was just another piece of info a monger looking for info could've used. I don't understand why cdls quip meant throwing shade at your recommendation in your eyes.
That more recent reviews, yours being one of them, should be considered after a four-year time lapse since I made my own comments about her. With that said, you are forgetting I use a different scoring system than others here. An 8 is average, so when I saw her, I scored her as average for looks and average for performance. I can still make positive comments about certain aspects of her looks, or her strengths in respect to her performance, but still find the OVERALL experience to be average. Average is the defined as what I EXPECT from a Kgirl for both looks and service after seeing as many as I have. I can also recommend an average girl in looks if she provides a solid Kgirl performance. What else can I say? If she is slender now, I wouldn't be opposed to seeing her again. She provides a dependable experience, IMO, just not something I can write home about. I'm sorry that you consider telling the truth "talking shit" because my experience did not match yours. Again, mine was four years ago.
"I'm sorry that you consider telling the truth "talking shit" because my experience did not match yours."
Exactly. This is the main problem here. Jensen is willing to call your report talking shit because... well I'm not entirely sure why exactly, but it probably has to do with his recommendation.
An attempt to discredit another mongers opinion to fit some narrative it seems. And let's be honest, you're very lenient on kgirls. For you to say she was average, should be telling to others. And yes, this was 4 years ago, but still not a reason to dismiss your opinion, especially since Jensen has supported your opinions before.
First though, is English your first language?
The reason why I ask is that, you seem to be reading "cheated" with some primary dictionary definition meaning and not paying attention to context of many types of "slang" or casual usage. I don't think many (any?) native American English speakers would read this discussion and conclude I was claiming CDL was intentionally deceiving anyone regarding Lixa. However, his statements did lead to a loss of interest in seeing her. So clearly he lost out on (again my assessment) having a very good session.
Now, if you claim is that he kept his money so is no worse off, well, that is not right either. Clearly we all value the good sessions more than the money we spend so the decision to not see a provider that can provide a very enjoyable time is also a loss for him.
However, since it is Friday again -- for those still in doubt just set your sights on Josephine
The only thing you're softening is impact on the girl. What is the terminology issue with what cdl said? Do tell. You claimed that he is "talking shit with his "near the cutoff" given other cases where he's said the girl was chubby"
So do tell, which girls have you seen that he's also seen, where you disagreed with him? You want to call me out on not seeing the girl, then be prepared to give examples here.
And when someone says he got cheated out of something, it always has a negative connotation.
Here, let me ask you something. Does this girl know who you are on here? Because that would explain a lot.
I have not idea if she knows or could figure it out or if she or her booker even look at TER. So just take you fucking stupid-assed, ignorant accusation and shove them up your ass.
You are literally impossible to have a reasonable conversation with.
But let's play your game. DO any of the grannies you'd so fond of and promote on the board here with the "they are all about service" claims know who you are? Cuz that would explain a lot. At least in my case it is reasonable to think that most of the other guys that saw the shill post would want to see her and will enjoy doing so. That's good for them. You, on the other hand, with all the attacks on anyone suggesting a good, younger provider, can only be seen as pimping for the geriatric. Most here will take a younger woman who is lacks a little in performance over some halmoni regardless of how well she performs. You don't do anyone, other than yourself, any favors that way.
-- Modified on 2/5/2021 6:12:10 PM
-- Modified on 2/5/2021 6:12:39 PM
I never claimed you're a shill. I only think if someone knows who you are, you'd probably choose your diction carefully so as to not cause issues. Cdl has claimed that no one knows who he is. So I was just wondering about you. This isn't an accusation btw....and you don't have to answer this.
Sure, I'll answer the same question. No one knows who I am on the board. This gives me freedom to talk what I feel like talking about. I call spade a spade and never give a shit if what I say affects someone's business. All I care about is being honest about girls - since this is what it's about. I never give my online handles to anyone in real life, I don't give my name or real phone number to any org or sex workers.
I don't promote anyone on this board. I have my favs, but none of them know who I am on the board or elsewhere. Any imperfections or fake pics they might have, I'll gladly talk about them right away. You won't catch me discrediting other mongers for saying something about them that is true. And I don't think any kgirls that are my atfs qualify as gilfs, yet.
I don't attack anyone. I attack dishonesty and sugarcoating. If you have pics that look like a slender model, that are many years old and even back ehn weren't true, well these pics are lies. I didn't say one bad thing about this girl. She can be an amazing provider for all I know. But it's clear to me that that set of pics is a sham.
On other hand, you discredited cdls viewpoint as bs and cited previous examples where he thought someone was chubby when you though they weren't. I kindly asked for those examples.
I'll be 100% honest with you here - yes, I think you're trying to make the girl appear better than she is by discrediting cdls opinion of her. If I'm wrong, then you will hear an apology from me first thing. In fact, I'd be very glad to be wrong. You've already proven me wrong once by sticking up for a swindled monger in the other thread, and I couldn't be happier.
Damn I remember these pics from the bay area....
I don't talk shit about Kgirl. Some people think I'm too lenient in some of my assessments because I don't like hurting a girl's business. There are customers for chubby girls. Some post on this board. I'm just not one of them. Many guys that are not on the West Coast have a lower standard because they have learned to "settle" for what they can get. I understand that, but I have to view girls compared to what else is here in SoCal, not by what the worldwide Kgirl market is like. For me, chubby is a girl who is not slender. I have attached a link below to a girl who's body is perfection for me. If you put 20 pounds on her, she might still be very attractive to most guys, but I would still have to describe her as a bit chubby. 20 pounds is adding 20% to her weight. That would be like me adding 40 pounds. There's no way I can do that without looking chubby to most people, except with steroids, and I don't go there.
-- Modified on 2/4/2021 9:25:15 AM
I would actually say it fit into the shill thread class -- I am actually suggesting others in the area would enjoy seeing her and certainly want her to stay around. We could use more locals here -- though suspect the area will always be dominated by touring girls.
While you do have a review in the profile it certainly is not unheard of that same name different girl confusion might be the case.
-- Modified on 1/23/2021 3:12:36 PM
Selas make her look very slender, but Lixas pics seem more true to her being curvy as per description.
So, how true are her body pics under Sela compared to the real thing?
I am pretty sure the Sela pic are from at least 2 years ago. The Lixa pics are current and very much her.
Like I've said before, generally the pics by the agencies in this area are pretty accurate (the COVID time is a bit of an exception) and for the few indies we have (or at least the ones that are not on something like BP types sites or AMPs) the pics are always very accurate.
Thanks. I do hope that people booking her look at all the pics and not just the old ones on Selas page.
She's very slender there, which diverges from info we have on her current body outlook.