Recent ad said, "On Vacation," now the ad is gone and there is an ad for a newby in Playa Vista. I am bummed; I only saw her once, but did intend to see her again at some point. Oh well, you snooze, you lose, I guess..

Too many aggressive service demands for bareback,fingers in O,fingers in V,anel,in LA,compared to other cities.The girls make it seem like it a lot of fun but it's hard work and very stressful enough without demands they are not comfortable with.  
All the girls go through this some handle it better than others.

Gotta agree with BD. Megan blacklisted alot of mongers and I believe Queen is also blacklisting same mongers.

I agree that the assholes are chasing a lot of the girls away from LA.  However, Megan is not one to run.  She's the type that will fight back.  The last I heard, she and her roommate are preparing a joint DNS list for their booker naming ungentlemanly customers who they are blacklisting and will not be seeing again.  As other girls follow suit, this just might cut some of the aggressive pushing by these jerks for off-menu services as they find they can't get an appointment with anyone anymore.  Some have already been told they are out and as is predictable, they are whining like little babies.  

it's strange that she would get upset and blacklist some mongers for requesting services that she admittedly offers to many other clients, such as bbfs. she takes several loads per day so it's not impossible for her to be on vacation for other reasons if you think about the high volume of clients that she goes through with risque behavior. anyone have any clue what happened to suri? i fear the worst but hope that she does return one day but always worried due to the amount of clients she was offering bbfs to.

her room has not been given to that new girl.

-- Modified on 2/1/2017 9:57:52 PM

were outing her on the boards and in reviews for offering BBFS.   That's the reason she left the time before that as well.  Most of the reviews claiming BBFS were fake.  A concerted effort by several Kgirl hobbyists here got the fake reviews removed and convinced her to come back.  Then guys started talking about her again.   Some, but not all, Kgirls have been offering BBFS to their established regulars for years, but most hobbyists have enough class not to mention specific girls names here or in reviews.  Apparently, not all hobbyists are classy.  I won't mention any names.  

They even tried to retaliate by posting little silly BS here and there of Megan. Read and heard. No class at all.

which reviews are fake as opposed to "indiscreet" when it comes to any girl?  And it only happens with established regulars?

Suri ID'd the fake ones and a group of hobbyists got together and helped her get them taken down.  That was a condition of her coming back the first time.  If the girl doesn't say, then there's no way to know.  Its very common for guys who push for BBFS and DON'T get it to retaliate against the girl by saying they DID get it.  These are the guys that are running top girls out of LA.  

I honestly don't understand this, if you need specific services than book someone that has it on their menu. Don't book someone that doesn't offer said services. Really simple. It shouldn't be that hard to be a decent, respectful client.

culture of young guys in this town that view it as a competition to see if they can one-up each other on the number of girls they can pressure into  BBFS.  Of course, bragging about it, whether it really happened or not, is how they make themselves look cool to the other dick-wads.  Kgirls are not savvy like American indies in knowing how to deal with fake reviews and retaliatory posts, and bookers often don't have the time unless its for one of their top girls, so many Kgirls give up and just start touring and leave LA behind.  

It's not news that any guy who has had bbfs with any girl should assume she's done it with others, maybe many, at least more than a few.  Likewise, the girls would be wise to assume if they do it, it may creep into reviews or discussion boards since so  many guys like to run their mouths about their experiences and how much know or think they know.

who she wants to "block."  (Their term for BL).  She just tells the booker to block the guy and he doesn't get to schedule any more appointments with her.  If something egregious happened, then the booker may decide to extend the BL on the guy to the whole agency, so an abusive move on a hobbyists part can sometimes cost him access to entire org.  To answer your question, if the girl was able to handle the situation herself and doesn't think the guy will be a problem in the future, she may choose not to report it to the booker.  From a practical standpoint, most of these guys that pressure a girl but are rebuffed are not going to repeat with her anyway, so the problem solves itself, and becomes a problem instead for the next girl that is targeted.  

careless in who she trusts, she has only herself to blame.  However, a guy has to choose to be a dick-wad, or not.  Gentlemen don't talk about receiving off-menu services in a public forum.  Those that do are making a conscious choice to betray the girl's trust, which makes them a scumbag.  

Doesn't change the fact that every review that suggests bbfs is fake.

That suggest  BBFS took place are fake?   I just went back through the thread and no one here said that, so what "fact" are you referring to?  Even so, it still makes the guys who put that in reviews a little scummy.  The exception is the odd girl that WANTS it known in order to get more customers.

I find it highly ironic when guys that pay for pleasure look down on those whom they pay and feel it okay to abuse them.

I suspect it's not at all about looking for providers who offer the service they want and that it IS all about dominating the girl and forcing their way on her. For some I suspect the wouldn't even enjoy it if it was actually freely offered.

Thsts it.  Just wanted to say it since your grouchy old self has returned!  

Immature One!