Curious about this one but no reviews. Anyone have any intel?

Thanks. Take Good care gentlemen....

 
http://newtopasia.hotprovider.com

-- Modified on 7/27/2020 4:03:03 PM

Probably obvious, but they are of a model named Ji Sung

http://jeenus.com/jeee622/

There's an Instagram too, jee622

This type of info helps mongers a lot more than fighting with orgs.  This is something you can completely control, so the results are dispositive.  Tilting  with orgs has too many variables that you can't control.  Kudo's for finding this so fast.

Actually I found it just by reading the "std board", as you call it. People on their LA board are super quick to point out rebrand, fake pics and meh experiences. (Of course, the board being very active means that there are org guys and shills there too)
I didn't even have to reverse image search it myself.

 

Please don't make it sound like it's an either or thing, no reason I can't do both.

Heard about this board over the years but never took the time to view it....Probably end up getting frustrated with the ignorance that exists there.    Is it truly worth monitoring?    

Thanks for the intel rocket.  

Much appreciated.

which new girls offer BBFS so they can go on my DNS list.  Sometimes the ad fails to state correctly that a girl is offering BBFS.  However, it takes multiple confirmations for me to consider her off limits.  If its just one of the tools over there claiming it, I put her in a holding pattern until there are more confirmations.   This board has a history of guys putting up fake posts of girls offering BBFS, so I watch carefully for rebuttals from more senior members that I also know from TER.  For me, its the only thing this site is the least bit helpful for, and that is sorting out risky girls.  The review format they use is mostly worthless for a guy like me looking for chemistry.  If the chemistry is there, I know how to make the physics superlative.

Lol, why do you need to check there if a girl is bbfs? When literally most org sites put up designation of girls, clearly indicating whether she's PSE or not. Many actually list the bbfs price, openly. Plus I thought you're buddies with bookers? Why not ask them?

 

Something is not adding up, cdl.  

 

Speaking of things not adding up. You claim you don't see bbfs girls. In last five reviews from bay area you have Yuna, Claire and New Ruby. They're as bbfs as they come. I mean, literally. You have like five cll (Vegas) girls in your reviews, pretty much all of them new PSE and saying so on their site. You have fucking Jamie reviewed, who is as bbfs as they come. You ever think that saying you don't see bbfs girls and put them on dns list, but then reviewing such girls doesn't make any sense at all? Like, at all?

It's a great source of information. If you can't separate information from things you find repulsive (such as tone, lust for bb, etc), then probably best not to look at it. Most reports there are fairly accurate, aside from obvious shills or low post characters. Many are focused on bb, meaning it's the #1 thing they're looking for, but reports, again, are fairly accurate.

But even reports/reviews aside, the rebrand/fake pcis info alone, is extremely valuable. Why do you think some agencies are now hiding pics behind password walls?

I wish people would write more in General Details about a lady's appearance.
.
How do you determine chemistry based on a review? What do you like to see in a review? I know your scoring system because I used a similar version of it.
.
It's been years since I reviewed here. I would like to start on the right foot again.  
.
It will not be fun when I get accused of killing the Kgirl's businesses like three years ago in this forum because of my reviews. I even tried to make my Juicy Details as long as possible so people will ignore me. People don't get my humor so I wanted my reviews ignored. Someone still read them and complained. I prefer not having to write Juicy Details at all.

in the last two years that are not advertised on their website as PSE, but when the time comes for entry, she asks me IF I want a condom . . . . or NOT.  Bear in mind this is the first time I'm seeing her.  So some of these girls don't want to put it in the ad, because they still want to retain the right to make a decision as to an individual customer who may look less than hygienic, but if she is offering the condom as an option to first-time customers, she is still a BBFS girl by my standards, even without formalizing it in an ad.  I'm not "buddies" with bookers in the BA, just a valued customer, but in this business you find out that asking SOME bookers about BBFS will get you BL'd, so next time, I'll PM you and you can ask for me.  Just ask the guys that book with J in Los Angeles.  There are even posts on this board about it from a few years ago.    Does that add up enough for you?  

 
The girls you mention were not advertised as BBFS, and no one I asked could confirm they were, so just to be safe, I booked the first appointment of the day.  I should probably add to my policy that its "to the extent practical."  I can't always get accurate intel in cities I'm traveling through.  if I can't get good intel one way or the other, and can't get the first appointment of the day, then its an automatic pass.  If I occasionally make a mistake and inadvertently book one that's PSE, I still use a cover, so the potential risk of being wrong is reduced for me several-fold.  

 
AS IT STATES IN THE FIRST LINE OF MY REVIEW OF JAMIE, I saw her in Las Vegas in January 2020, at an agency (Vegasasian, formerly the Hobby Shop) that does not advertise, nor usually have, BBFS girls.  I think the local LV guys can verify that this house doesn't usually have PSE girls, nor do they promote it.   When I reviewed her, she had already gone to another location, so I linked her review to her current location.  So before you make a fool of yourself next time, you should read my review.  I ALWAYS state where I saw a girl if its not at her current location when I link the ad for the review.  I have a number of these in my review history.  If you make spurious claims like this with researching first, you are going to end up looking like your new BFF, BigPapsmear.  

I’ve been going to VAC for 5+ years. Seen many ladies multiple times. I’ve never been offered bbfs. That’s one of the things I like about VAC. The ladies are always well dressed, squeaky clean, and use protection. That’s also why I don’t patronize the Vegas K-org that openly offers bbfs.

As far as bay area girls I've mentioned, all of them were advertised as PSE on their sites from day one. I know, I've seen Yuna and Claire more than 20 times combined. They're in my top 3. And I look at all bay orgs sites daily.  

Here is ad for Yuna in November, clearly advertised as pse
She was advertised as psa from day one.  

http://kgirlsacademy.com/kga-student-yuna' target=_blank>http://web.archive.org/web/20191121102632/http://kgirlsacademy.com/kga-student-yuna

Claire advertised as gfe/PSE in February (your review was in February) :

http://kgirlsacademy.com/kga-student-claire/' target=_blank>http://web.archive.org/web/20200208170728/http://kgirlsacademy.com/kga-student-claire/

Either your research skills (ie, finding the ad and looking for pse) are awful, or you are lying. Why would you see girls who do new PSE if you claim you don't see such girls?  

Anyone from the bay will tell you what type of org kga is. People who really dont see bbfs girls, like my buddy seanfinn, for example, don't visit this org at all.

 
You claim you know everything about LA girls. Yet Jamie who had been around Vegas and LA, and previously in the bay, openly offering bbfs, you somehow don't know? You just said you check std board exactly for this info. There are multiple mentions of Jaimie and bbfs all over that board. Yes, VAC is known as a cfs agency.

 

So yes, your claims are not adding up. You claim you don't see bbfs girls, yet you put reviews out for them.  

And if you didn't know those bay girls were bbfs, I'm sorry, but you're ridiculously terrible at research and reading (the part where you open the website look at girl ad that clearly says PSE), and you shouldn't really lecture anyone on researching.

TER forum parser butchered those web archive links

Let's try this again:

Claire:  

https://web.archive.org/web/20200208170728/https://kgirlsacademy.com/kga-student-claire/

Yuna:
https://web.archive.org/web/20191226074208/https://kgirlsacademy.com/kga-student-yuna/

Sorry for the spam everyone.

I'll say one thing. I actually believe cdl didnt know about these girls being PSE and didn't research enough. But how are you going to call out other people on other forums about their research then?

My dude, next time you're in the bay, hit me up. Or twoon. Or seanfinn. We (well, I assume twoon and Seann are up to it) will tell you which girls are bbfs and which ones are not, so you don't see bb girls by accident.

 
 And it's low to call me bigpapas BFF. I don't associate with him. And that thread about poor family was not a good look for him.

He did FINALLY get it almost in its original version, but even then he was still lying about his own post, but I doubt that surprises anyone. I do agree that was kind of a low blow by CDL, but I'll try to stay out of your private fight with him.  

 
The real reason for my reply was to give you a tip about posting links on TER, if you want to post a link in the body of your post you need to delete the "s" in https. That will give you a clickable link.

That's the lowest I have ever sunk on this board.  Lol    You  are definitely not like BigPapsmear,  nor would I wish his duplicitous, backstabbing "friendship" on you.  

No worries. I'm glad we clarified the issue about the bay girls. Like I've said, at least you got to experience two of the best service girls in the bay who are legendary.