why guys write fake reviews. Some guys on sex boards are not really hobbyists and don't see ANY girls, but want to be accepted by the other members as part of the "club." ALL of their reviews are fake. Others are very low volume due to budget limitations and want to appear to be higher volume, so SOME of their reviews are fake.
The best way to sort them out is to look for details in the review that would only be known if the reviewer actually saw the girl. If its a girl I have seen, then its easy to disqualify a review on faulty facts. For instance, if the girl has a tattoo the size of a basketball, and the reviewer doesn't mention it, then chances are, its a fake review. Many guys don't like tattoos, so if there is a significant tattoo (on bigger than an inch), I will always point is out for the guys that are turned off by tattoos. OTOH, you can't go by fake/real tits, because many guys don't know how to spot the new deep implants that look and feel like the real thing. Lack of details is why I don't put much stock in generic reviews that can apply to just about any girl. You know, the ones that are little more than this . . . . .
"Hot girl; LFK; undressed; DFK; shower; BBBJ; DATY; CG; RCG; ACG; Mish: Doggy; DFK; left."
Add a little fluff to this and it fits ANY Kgirl because its just a list of the basic Kgirl routine. This is why I always try to include something unique about the experience, but not SO unique that my experience was a one-off. If she has a signature move, or a particular technique, I will mention it.
Many guys get major facts wrong, like one that said a skinny girl was fat, or another one that said a Kgirl used a massage table instead of a bed, or another that said the apartment had no shower. All BS. I keep a list for my own use of guys writing fake reviews so that I know not to rely on them in choosing Kgirls to see.
BTW, nice to see you back here.