This is about TER policy to delete outdated links in Profiles.  I want TER to keep links active for a longer time before declaring the link expired.  This is especially a problem with K-Girls.

I don't know about the West Coast, but here in the east, it creates a big problem with duplicate Profiles and the inability to track reviews.  Example:

Mary works at KMP-1 and gets Profile-1 with a link to URL-1/Mary/

Mary moves across town (or across the street!) to KMP-2. Someone who doesn't recognize her from KMP-1 creates a new Profile-2 with URL-2/Mary.  

When I catch it, I will report the problem to Admin and ask them to merge the reviews, keep the OLDER (original) Profile number, Profile-1 and to update the info with KMP-2, URL-2, Phone-2, etc.  Admin rarely accepts these problem reports without photographic proof.  That is, I have to find Mary's old photos at URL-1/Mary and prove to TER that they are the same pics as URL-2/Mary.  

[Are you following me so far?]

Sometimes, Mary goes on vacation for a month or works on the other coast with a new name for 6 months and returns to work at KMP-3. Some new visitor creates yet another new Profile number, Profile-3, with KMP-3, URL-3/Mary, ... .  When I notice this, I know to look for the earlier Mary Profiles and tell Admin about the Duplication.  Sometimes, they have already deleted the links because Mary was not ACTIVE at KMP-1 or KMP-2 (no longer working there and on the current gallery page).  But I'm left in the lurch because I can't remember the (hidden) URL for Mary at her old places.  And that leaves "us" in the lurch because we don't know that Mary Profile-3 should actually have 10, 20 or more reviews to guide us instead of just 1.

The KMPs sometimes use easy to figure out URLs: www.yourfavoriteplace.com/gallery/Mary so I can find Mary's old pics and PROVE that New Mary is Old Mary.  But, more and more, the KMPs are using randomized addressing that makes it impossible to find Mary's old pics at her old place, even though they are still on the server: www.yourfavoriteplace.com/gallery/4QtzMe123.html is Mary's old picture folder but it's already been deleted from the TER Profile so I can't find it.

**** I want TER to keep the URLs in the Profile for a longer time than they currently do, at least for the K-girls.  

Here on the east coast, there are many touring semi-indy K-girls. They tour like indies, but they don't maintain their own websites.  They show up on an agency website in Boston (BAD), in DC (RF), in Atlanta (AE), at a few different places in NYC and elsewhere and then back around. That can result in multiple Profiles and most guys don't know about the duplicates.  The reviews from the guys in Atlanta are helpful to the guys in Boston and so on but you can't read them if they aren't there!

If they were real indies, they would have a permanent personal website and their calendar would say, "Boston Oct 1-10, DC Oct 14-23, ATL Nov 2-15, ...".  Because of the nature of the K-Girl style, we lose that continuity.  K-Girl profiles should maintain historically relevant links even though they can only be in one place at a time.

Do you agree that we should ask TER to keep K-Girl URLs active even as they move about from KMP to KMP and city to city?  Ideally, the link would not be retired until the K-Girl retires (vacation is not the same as retire!) or the KMP goes out of business and takes its website down.  

Is this a problem on the West Coast, too?  

Thanks

...it will be deleted by TER pursuant to a Problem Report.  TER cannot keep an URL "active" if the ad has expired.  The ad is simply no longer on the internet.  You can't keep a corpse alive.

Duplicate profiles is a problem that has been around since the beginning of TER.  Mostly, it is done by providers who create a new persona to run away from negative reviews.  Not so for K-girls.  K-girls have duplicate and triplicate profiles because bookers change their names when they move to different cities.  Or sometimes they go back to South Korea and when they return they change their names to appear "new."

On the West Coast, the problem also lies with the hobbyists.  They are aware that many providers have changed their names and have multiple profiles.  In fact, they post that information and mention the previous name in reviews.  However, they rarely report this information to TER so that the profiles can be combined.  Here's a classic example where the king of the K-hobbyists had knowledge of a provider who had multiple profiles, yet chose not to help his K-bros out but instead kept the information to himself:

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?BoardID=113&SortBy=DateCreated%20desc&Search=reported&SearchType=3&Author=bigpapasan&DayFrom=3000&DayTo=0&MessageID=1250&frmSearch=1#1250

TER also cannot combine profiles if the older one's links are gone.  They have no way to prove whether the two providers are the same without photos to compare them.

 


-- Modified on 10/26/2015 10:54:19 PM

I'm not really talking about the name-changers, but that is a separate issue.  

I'm even talking about girls with one name who are current and active but touring and whose pics are still maintained on all of the websites, just not on the "home" page of currently available girls.  

I'm going to post some examples:  

Hyori 254861 is currently at BAD but has been at EA. Thankfully, both URLs are still there to PROVE that. Hyori may have been at RHF or will be at RHF but I can't find her RHF link.  

Asuka 274051 has been at BAD, EA, and RHF. Her pics are still easily found at BAD and EA but not RHF.
Asuka has a personal indy website for Seattle and is might be known elsewhere on the West Coast as Asuka or some other name.  But there is clear proof that BAD Asuka is EA Asuka is RHF Asuka is Seattle Asuka.  

Many of these KMP / agencies keep the pics on their servers for a while (as they should) even if the girl has moved on or is on vacation.  

If TER removes the links from the Asuka 274051 Profile and returns to BAD, we'll have a hell of a time proving that it's the same Asuka as before.

Other examples abound in NYC where there are many KMPs all over midtown, sometimes more than one on the same block!  

Star 255461 started at Dream G, moved the A Flowers and her DG and AF profiles had to be merged. Having the pics on the DG server made that work. Star went on vacation for a couple of months and returned to A Flowers. If her URLs or pics had been removed and a new Star Profile created, it would have been hard to remember where her old pics were still stored.  

Same thing for Tiffany 255461. She had two profiles, one for Dream G where she was for a while (her pics are still there: http://www.dreamgirlny.com/tiffany.htm ) and a new one for A Flower, where she is now. If Tiffany moves from A Flower to A VIP and A Flower takes her pics off of their server, we would need the Dream G URL to prove that a new Tiffany Profile at another KMP is the same Tiffany ... but TER removed the DG URL.

So confusing!  

BP: Unlike Harpman, I do try to point out duplicates when I find them but TER Admin gives me a tough time because I can't prove my point ... because they have already removed a link and replaced it with "Report New Website".  When I try to, they say, "Where's the proof?"  

If the URLs, even multiple URLs, stay alive for a couple of months, it will be a lot easier to merge the duplicate profiles.  

OK. Just one of my peeves. Until we install GPS RFID in the K-girls, we'll have to rely on each other to help us lap-dogs find them and follow-them around. A lot of the K-Girl links remain ACTIVE even if she isn't on the home page of current girls.  
www.dreamgirl.com - NO LONGER ON HOME PAGE
www.dreamgirl.com/star - still there on her pics page
 But even when they keep the same name.  
   Right. Even when there is testimonial evidence (my own), they want to see the pics ... but very often they are responsible for removing the very link that will prove the duplicate.