is that the Kgirl is cute in a plain way, maybe natural cute. Definitely, a hard look to define, but I at least think she's going to be nice looking. Always subjective and how the describer sees the Kgirl at that time. Lighting, angle, happy or not at that moment (smiling or not), IMO, can come into play! I've reviewed that the Kgirl's looks got better/sexy looking after a good romp in the sack^^!
When I see it I kinda skip through it. The only piece of information it gives me that the face isn't top tier.
I've found that reviewers who use GND usually also use DDG and generally those are the only terms they will use so it will be binary. Either one or the other. Ie, you'd almost never see people who use these terms use a stronger term like "butterface". So in the context of range of what gnd could mean, it usually can range from butterface to plain Jane to cute but nothing special to average. So, if I read many reviews calling girls face as gnd I'm generally tempering my expectations for face.
There are numerous interpretations of the term "GND," and individual preferences can vary widely.
from my book, typically I'd use the following words to rate appearance: DDG Goddess Beautiful Pretty Attractive GND cute GND plain Average Plain Not my cup of tea
That's a bit how I've always thought of it. Basically, if the girl is not cute/attractive/pretty why would I actually notice or take note of her, but as you say, in a down to earth type of way rather than glomorous or high fashion sense. Borrowing from anoter thread, a bit like the difference between Mary Ann and Ginger -- I would see Mary Ann, but not Ginger, as GND looks.
But I had seens comment that made me think the person was describing what he thought of as rather plain and unremarkable. That would have been a bit outside my range of expected look. However, as you say, it's very subjective (even when the same basic defitition is used) and a number of factors come into play as well.
I agree with both of these definitions. To me GND is average or above average facial features, and a fit but not tight or curvy body. Mary Ann, not Ginger is a perfect example.
Ok. So then about half of all kgirls would be not your cup of tea.
Do you have some reviews of them? Have some names? Cuz I almost never seen you talk about those. Given that it's around half the population of kgirls I would think it's way more common. No? That's kind of the problem I was implying. Many people want to act like that half the kgirls (and it's not a symptom of just kgirls, it's the whole fucking industry) who are not desirable doesn't exist. It's as if only one half of the curve exists and starts at grade 6 or 7.
thing. I see each Kgirl/woman as how she has her own unique look and appreciate it from there. I don't nitpick about eyes too close; nose should be wider/thinner or any of the things you can read about in forums/ discussion groups.
I apply these criteria when evaluating women, whether in everyday life or in the context of selecting a K-date. In everyday interactions, I tend to be more generous and less critical. However, when conducting research and selecting an escort, I am highly particular and specific about my preferences: weight not exceeding 120 lbs, not too short or petite, minimal plastic surgery, balanced physique, no rounded or plain faces. While most of my dates align with these preferences, I have occasionally had disappointing experiences. In such cases, I recognize that the fault lies in my inadequate research.
Which might also explain why most of the girls you see are in the upper end (or left tail as you labled the graph) as I suspect those are are found less attracted by most, and particularly those seen as much less attractive, are not going to find much interest from those seeking escorts and certainly little interest from agencies, so simply don't have much if any participation in this activity. That would naturally skew the grades up and be confusing to any that want grade on a curve, as it were, by making some average for those that are working in this business rather than some view of all women.
OMG I haven't seen a graph of S = σ = ∑ ( x − x ¯ ) 2 n in a long, long time. I think all mongers have @ least one standard deviation from the norm - I've got several myself. But when it comes to GNS it's as much about attitude as looks. I think of GNS as young and/or shy and a projecting an innocent facade.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
