One of my long time fav was Taylor in MW, but she's been touring for the last several months and now back in the LA/OC area.   Saw her pic in HX's Princess.Garden.  Does this agency have a website I can contact via txt.  I'm no longer a HX member.

I’m not sure that this is the same Taylor that was in LA before or not. Let us know if it is the same gal. She was on my bucket list.

Thanks!  Its Taylor and look like she got some new pics.

Great time with Taylor!!  Review coming soon.

FYI she also was/comes back to bay area as Taylor as well.

I was tempted to book, but now I'll wait for your review to get the details.  LOL

Love her new pics.

She says her home base is now in the BA when not traveling.  Looks like I will be visiting SM alot more often.

Why do you need to wait for a review when you've already reviewed her in the past ? I visited numerous times when she worked in LA, booked first by New Top Asian and then Sweet Asian Gem/SAG.  Some of these newer pics where up for a short time at the tail end of her last run with SAG.  I visited her yesterday and can verify it is the same Taylor. Her looks and service have been consistent as long as I've seen her, so if you did see her and consider your review accurate, the leopard's spots are pretty much the same.

I was recently disappointed in another girl that I had seen 4 years ago when she returned to OC for a brief period.  She was one of the hottest girls I used to see regularly from 2013-2016.  25-30 dicks a week causes a lot of wear and tear on a Kgirl when you multiply it by 4-5 years.  Not only were her looks completely shot (+25 pounds, saggy tits, droopy face, etc.) but the service was about half as good as what I remember.  Its been about the same time lapse since I saw Taylor.  THAT is why I will wait for Trimix' review, thank you.  Once burned, twice shy.  

If you go you'll see stars. unless she turns off the lighting devices in the bath and br.

Just wondering, have you written a review on this disappointing experience?

I kind of mess up on her review as it still lists her location as San Mateo.  Could be nice if you can write a review with her OC incall.  This may mean setting up a new profile for Taylor.

I like it when the stars hit her eyes just when she climaxed.

fuck the review (no offense Trimix, I'll still read and enjoy it), I'll go in the next 5 days.

when she left again.  No ad link, no approval from TER on the review.  I wasn't the only one disappointed.  She was dissed pretty well on another Kgirl forum.  Booker said she is probably out for  good.  I won't name her here, but if you're curious, PM me.  She was a legend, but only worked OC.  Maybe you saw her.  

As expected. No review and you won't name her here.

There was a Taylor here I think about a couple of months ago.  Most liklely the same one. the LA BA sister orgs seem to match up, but the anecdotal stuff  on her in the BA was below average and so were her reviews.  

that may know her to PM me.   Booker says she won't be back.  What is the point of publicly bashing a girl that has retired?   It serves no purpose except to make me look like a dick.  If she's not coming back, then there is no need to alert other mongers that she was below average, and if there was, a review the place to do that.  

Lmao.  

Taylor has been in and out (hehe) of bay area for like a year.  

Could be a different Taylor as I last saw her at her LA in-call in Dec/Jan earlier this year.  She had like a zillion reviews back in the Monkey site.

My fellow mongers ARE protected by the fact that she is retired and is not coming back.  If she does come back, I will post some kind of warning.  Is that fair enough?  If she doesn't come back, it doesn't matter, does it?   Do you feel its important for YOU to be "protected" from a retired girl?  Now you're coming off as a pedantic putz.

No, that's not fair enough. How do I know you're telling the truth of her being gone? How will I know that you will indeed post a warning if she comes back?

She only worked at one agency her entire career.   She did not tour, ever.  I gave you the name of the agency by PM, if you are approved there, I will give you the name.  Otherwise, you don't have to worry about seeing her and being disappointed, do you?  If you can't get into that agency, you can't ever see her. If you can't see her, no harm, no foul, right?   When you find out what you have to do to get screened there, you will bail.  Then its on you that you didn't find out her name.  

It's hilarious how you failed to address equating a truthful description of a girl "Not only were her looks completely shot (+25 pounds, saggy tits, droopy face, etc.) but the service was about half as good as what I remember"

confident enough to accept my challenge.  Its time to put up or shut up.  I say there is no link, you say you can find one. If you can't you stop posting, if you do, I'll write the review AND I will stop posting on this board.  You have a lot to gain if you find a link.  You  said you are "extremely confident" you can do it, so what do you say.  Do you accept?  If not, its a complete surrender on this one and you must limp home with your tail between your legs, just like BigPapsmear.  I apologized once for likening you to him, and now its killing me.

You did not send me anything by pm (yet).

I am confident in my ability to find this link, but not confident enough to risk my account.

Well, unlike for bigpapa, you can't use "he doesnt see kgirls" argument against me.

"No ad link, no approval from TER on the review."

And not returning.  Reviews are to help mongers who may want to see her.  Why should I waste my time finishing a review that will do no one any good.  Its not going to help mongers who want to avoid her.  Avoiding her is moot because she's no here.  I don't waste my time reviewing girls that are retired.  If they come back, then that's another matter, but until she does, I'm not going to waste my time finishing the review. If she comes back, then I will finish the review.  Right now, it will help NO ONE.  You're just trying to make a point that is already moot.  Why are you so invested in this?  Are you going to join BigPapsmear in the stalker brigade?  How about I write a review dedicated to you for a girl that is still here?  Will that massage your ego enough?  

You said that you were not able to finish review because of no link. Now you're changing your tune once I pointed out this agency has girls reviewed on here with just the agency h_x link. Lol. Hilarious.

for the lady in question.  It doesn't matter if the agency still has other girls advertised.  SHE IS NOT THERE ANYMORE.  I spend an hour-plus on each of my reviews.  I would  rather use that time to help my fellow mongers by reviewing a girl they can STILL see.  I don't know why you can't seem to understand this.  If I thought a review would help even "One Poor Schmuck", I would write one, but how can a review of a retired Kgirl HELP anyone?

Again, you said

from my proposition???  I told you if you could give me a tangible benefit to any monger from me completing a review for a retired girl that is not coming back, I would reconsider finishing the review.  It looks like you agree there is NO tangible benefit to any monger in completing the review.  You say it would be a benefit to know something about me, but that's not a benefit that is scalable to other mongers.  The review is to give information about the girl, not me.  You are grasping at straws now and are two steps away from becoming our second Kgirl board troll by keeping up your lame attempt at bulling me into do it anyway.  

I already said I'm not taking your proposition. And you telling me the agency already proved it to be wise choice. Since that agency doesn't apparently have links to girls at all, just blog posts on h_x. Even if I find a cached version of girls ad, Im not even sure it will qualify.  

LA/OC Taylor was most definitely in the BA because I stumbled onto BA add and was bummed she was up there.   When I saw her the other day she said she work for month during her last stint up there and then took a 3-month COVID avoidance break.

She wad definitely in San Mateo as her pics match, but I'm not sure if the one I saw who was last year at hotkcuties before and the along with Abella went to kpleasures, is the same girl. I posted a post with pics, but ter disallowed them because they were from the donkey site.

These are the words I wouldn't use to describe Taylor: "below average", "meh service", "volatile attitude", "used to BB".  
.
She was so good she slipped the condom on during the shower without me noticing. LA/OC Taylor was a tiny spinner closer to 5.0 than 5.3 and tits on a stick. She had enhanced Cs. I don't think she would go to orgs like hotkcuties or kpleasures. I know she was at Tiny Org Luxury Lips in San Mateo but didn't remember she went to other orgs there. There were Abella & Taylor starting at kpleasures around May 2019 but I didn't remember that Taylor as LA/OC Taylor.  
.
I think all of these are her reviews. Somebody should combine these profiles. You can find her two sets of pics in those profiles. The newest set is being used at Princess Garden. The older set was on Foxylists.
.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/taylor-6507738434-347702
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/taylor-2137169455-313003
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/taylor-7028243221-351251
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/taylor-350067

Yes, I saw this Taylor's pics. As you might know, the pics often don't say much. But indeed, this does appear to be a different Taylor although I'm still not 100% sure. That Taylor was all looks but no service. Then, I'm pretty strict on grading service. She was definitely taller than 5'0 tho.

are all the of the Taylor that is currently working in OC and in LA of and on in recent years.  The link to the "347702" review doesn't have an add/pic, so can't say about that one.  The Taylor now in OC and in the three review links with pics, does not have implants, she is not enhanced, not tits on a stick.

My outside Kgirlfriend is starting back to work  this week after a two-month layoff because of her Covid fears, and she wanted more time with me this past week above out usual Saturday overnights, so I had to postpone Taylor to keep the peace.  However, you can send a PM to TERSupport and provide the new link and they will add it to her profile.  That will fix the problem.  If you want me to do it, I will, just PM me.  I will read your review today.  Just got home from my overnighter.  

I'm not going to pm. I don't need to know and I might not know her anyway if she's only worked in Orange County.  Plus I seldom ever either initiate or receive PMs on any related website. But it seems your last sentence should say that you "won't" rather than "can't" even say publicly she was below average/see at your own risk.

I mentioned Foxylists pics to see if you can recall anything when looking at them. Those were her real pics although it may be hard to tell with her face being blurred and photoshopped. I could still see the resemblance in her face.
.
I don't doubt the Taylor you saw were "all looks but no service" and had "good looks, although face is subjective, I like it. Id say one of better faces." LA Taylor's strong point is her service/performance.  
.
Although I don't remember your Taylor's pics, I seem to remember she had similar pics as Abella's. Her pics showed a youthful attractive face. Based on pics alone, I would say your Taylor appeared to be younger and more attractive. I would see your Taylor if she appears again, hopefully in LA/OC so I can see her immediately.

With my fuzzy memory it was probably exaggerated and wrong to say Taylor was tits on a stick since she was not skinny. Better description may be petite spinner with tight body and big tits if Cs are considered big. I thought she had enhanced Cs but I will need to re-examine her breasts once again.
.
TER 347702 was also her. This is where she will come back to. Ask her if she started working in San Mateo around January this year. She probably was Tiny's roommate or worked in the same building. Does anyone remember Tiny / Yu Hee / Ra Hee?
.
You can find Taylor's pics at Luxury Lips for TER 347702 here:
.
http://switter.at/@luxurylips/103522989661603467

-- Modified on 8/9/2020 1:41:30 PM

It's up to you, but - do you mind editing that brand name out of your post if possible ? As much shit as I give the orgs, giving a brand name that can identify the building nearby is imo not good on a public forum.

I'll send you a pm with pics. TER did not like me including links with donkey site in the url.

I am too cheap to buy VIPs, too annoying when reviewing, too lazy to fix profiles so I can't read PMs yet.
.
May be you can give a partial URL hint with the site ID and the archival site you used so as not to include the banned domain here. Thanks.
.
I removed the locationing hint for Luxury Lips. It was indeed uncomfortable to see a post pointing so close to home.

its not an archive...ok, google the following words 'neurotic donkey'  (replace it with the real name of the site) 'taylor' 's1' 'kpleasures'

Certain that your Taylor was not LA/OC Taylor. Thanks for confirming the pics I remember your Taylor was using.
.
Her pics do look younger and more attractive and I would see her given the chance. Only way for her to be LA/OC Taylor is if both the org and Taylor did a B&S with fake pics and fake stats unlike the pics LA/OC Taylor normally used.
.
For the curious, Rocketbro's Taylor is the one in green. I think Abella is the one with white top and Pixie is the one in black.

Of those 4 pics, 3 are relatively new.  The one in the lower left, sitting in a chair, with orange top, is one she used for many years and right from her start (the Foxy List pics displayed under TER ID 313003).  The luxury lips add is correct to say she is natural, but she's closer to B if you ask me, especially compared to what I would generalize as K-girl average. General K-girl average to me means significantly more likely to be enhanced than not, and to about a C size.  B/C whatever you want to call her, she does not have big tits unless your comparing to a girl that's either flat or very small.

If you do review Taylor "again" you might also want to say sorry for your review under TERID 313003 (which was and is the current Taylor).  She is not enhanced. Maybe you were too focused on her personality.

If you decide to review Taylor "again" you might want to point out the error in your review under TERID 313003, which was and is a good ID for Taylor.  She is not enhanced C, she is easily identified as natural and I say smaller than C. Maybe you were focused too much on her personality.

I would say they are more B than C.

Yes,it is the girl in the green

The photos of the Taylor that I saw in 2016 are the ones linked below.  Thanks to BT for posting them.  So the $300 question is, is this the same Taylor being advertised at P2G.  Looks like a completely different girl to me, except for the one on the link on the upper right, although the P2G photos look familiar as well as someone I may have seen a long time ago.  Are they one and the same?

-- Modified on 8/9/2020 5:16:11 PM

Cdl, I'm not sure why you have so much trouble with links, but the pics you posted from switter that bt posted, are the same as pics at p2garden...lol

Did you read my response to BT? The $300 question is why your review (the words, not box checking) say she is an enhanced C.  She is not enhanced and I'm saying that based on hands on experience.

And I presume you can confirm my statement that she is without a doubt natural?

Kgirls later, I can't tell you how I missed that.  With the newer implants, they put them in deeper and MANY profilers get it wrong by calling them naturals.  The best way for me to tell is to put them on their back.  If they are implants, they stay up  on top, if they are naturals, they will slide a little towards the armpits.  All I can say this far back is that they must have looked to me like upgrades.  I enjoy nipple play,  but I'm not a tit-squeezer, so if I missed something by relying on my visual test that is obvious to others from kneading, then, of course, you have my apologies.  For some reason, I don't think  you are considering seeing her based solely on my review  Lol

The only photo I remembered from when I saw her in the past was the one in the green chair, and that one is not on the P2G gallery, but I totally missed the fact that ONE of the old ones (with her back to the camera) is an exact match to one of the ones that BT put up. Sorry to waste everyone's time on this one.  I'm now convinced its the same girl I saw four years ago. The back and forth between you and BT about "your Taylor" versus "our Taylor" gave me doubts.  I'm the retard on this one.  You can have the next one.  Lol

I didn't say I kneaded them and she is obviously natural is you just look when in person with her

-- Modified on 8/10/2020 9:18:06 AM

I often have trouble determining bra size and go with what she said. I won't be able to tell natural or not without being fully hands on and I still may get it wrong. Whenever I see an ad of a Cs, I think implant at first.
.
This is the reason, as you said: "General K-girl average to me means significantly more likely to be enhanced than not, and to about a C size." Bra size and implants are my least concerns.

Just yanking your chain. I assume most long time Kgirls here will have a boyfriend at one time or another while they are working. Whether they have a boyfriend or not does not change anything. I just want the best one hour each time.
.
I am happy enough if I get everything I want in one hour.

Got an appointment with Amber this week and I'll find out who her current bf.  Definitely its not me!!

She has been off nearly four months for Covid.  She has postponed her return date twice, but she did, in fact, start back today.  Her original return was supposed to be the beginning of July, then mid-July.  Amber's kind of high-profile for an anonymous guy like me.  I've always been with second TER girls on the outside.  Fewer attempted hustles that way.  Other mongers I have talked to that date outside agree that the best girlfriend potential is second-tier girls.  They rarely have GPS.  

It's Sia, isn't it? Sorry, that's enough yanking LOL.
.
I don't really separate girls into top tiers or second tiers. I would want to be with the most attractive one. My heart would be ripped out if I fall for a Kgirl though. Wouldn't it also be awkward if you want to see them again as a client?
.
I was upset at a girl recently and blocked her. Just couldn't think of anything nice to say as she tried to re-connect through other channels. Now that I cool down I think I was being childish and rude. She was great and it would be nice to see her again when she comes back. What's done is done. I am also shameless enough to see her again and apologize LOL.

(and after four years I can't remember the details of why I would have)  I APOLOGIZE.  Don't know if I will see her again if she's natural (I prefer aftermarket upgrades myself).  I will just say that if I got it wrong and ANYONE (not just you) went to see her based on an apparent error in my review of four years ago and was disappointed, show me YOUR review from back then that says so and I'll be happy to reimburse you the cost of the session.  Otherwise, no harm, no foul.  If you're still not satisfied, give me an address and I'll send you a pint of blood.  Lol

the most attractive one for a girlfriend, and I have tried that a few times.  When a girl KNOWS she is hot (and if you don't believe it, just ask HER - Lol), they can be really demanding.  This goes for civvie women as well.  The dynamic changes a little if you're bringing deep pockets to the table.  That has always been the way to balance a relationship with any hot girl, but then its easy for your financial depth to become her sole motivation, which is another common trait of the super-hot Kgirls.  

My rules prevent me from having anything other than a professional relationship and/or a friendship with another woman.

are more emotionally invested than they are, they can be tough negotiators, but I have found that if I call their bluff and say we should maybe take a break, they will often capitulate pretty quickly.  They will try to control you,  as you point out, but only if you let them.  You have to pick your battles.  If you give them a "win" once in awhile on the small stuff, when you stand firm on the big things, you are more likely to prevail and have things the way YOU want them.  

I did not see her based on your review. Too funny that you're still rambling on and on trying to school everybody about how to do a fake tit test when you failed so badly in this case.  But then, I know there more than a few batting coaches who either never made it to the big league themselves, or had a low batting average if they did make it.

Your sarcasm meter is broken.  Just had to tweak it enough to get one more post out of you.  Do you see the irony in telling ME that I am going on and on about it?  You posted it in several different places on this same thread.   LOL

Yeah noticed my repeated posts and thought oh fuck.  I got something screwed up in my computer settings and page kept crashing before I could hit the send button or even finish typing.  I started all over again a couple of times, but looks some of the ones I thought didn't go through actually did. So those are cases of computer retardation not sarc-meter breakdown.

We go way back.  You were fucking with me and I was fucking with you.  And as I said earlier, you are someone here that can be trusted.  Peace, brother.

Saw Amber and just as hot now as before COVID.  The building had issues with an elevator and the second entrance had call box problem.  So be patience and you may be lucky to see her in street clothes when she comes down to fetch you.

I suppose there is an element of fucking with you in my sarcasm, but like the Rocket man (on this thread), I'm more fixated on the truth.  I saw Taylor when she first started in LA and when she pops up for a stint in LA and now OC. In the recent thread about Hami, who like Taylor, you reviewed but now seem very confused about, I had seen her a couple of times a few years ago, so can speak from direct experience. You chimed in on a post about Lyn, as is if you know her, but when advised that your post was not accurate, you admitted you'd never even seen her and were just repeating something you'd heard. Rocket and others have pointed to your continual attempts to deflect.  Your deflection on this thread about OC legend girl worked with Rocket in the sense that you successfully turned it into lengthy arguments about it being a review issue when it really just boils down to you not wanting to post her name here on this thread. You're the one that opened yourself up to the name question in the first place and your argument about what's the upside is lame, as pointed out by Rocket. There is no downside.  You said it would make you look like a dick.  Well, my name is Richard, and you can call me Dick, or a dick, but it is a kingly name none the less.  

rpd1952, I was curious what you thought was said incorrectly about Lyn so I found that thread. There were more than one veterans who got it wrong about Lyn. I would agree with everything you said in that thread.
.
I was able to see Lyn during the shutdown. She was not afraid of Covid at all but got tested to protect the senior. Lyn now works Mon-Sat 11-4PM if I remember right. She didn't work Saturdays before.
.
I didn't reply in that thread because if a monger really wants to see Lyn, he better hopes he didn't get blocked and he must have great patience if he does not book Lyn regularly. Lyn is worth the effort though.
.
By the way, you CAN get blocked for saying something a provider does NOT like to hear.

her policy to only allow same-day bookings?  I ALWAYS prebook.  My professional responsibilities just don'[t allow me the flexibility to make last-minute bookings.  The best I can normally manage is 48-72 hours in advance. Occasionally, I have been able to book only 24 hours out, but I think in nearly 12 years, I have only booked a same-day appointment twice.  

+1 for truth !

Who told you that? I could still prebook her during Covid. She also said I can prebook when I made an offhand remark that she is hard to book. I cannot say if a monger can prebook or get a response from her booker.
.
I would take a day off just to see Lyn when she didn't work Saturdays.
.
Is Lyn not good enough for you to review? I am surprised if you were not able to prebook her.

I actually did prebook her on two occasions about two years ago, and was cancelled on the same day both times.  I talked to Sunny about it (have been a customer of hers for several years) and she told me that cancellation is always a risk with Lyn.  She gets up in the morning, has her coffee, and THEN decides whether she feels like working or not. She told me the only way to eliminate the risk is to book same-day.  After that, I quit trying.  If that has changed since them, I will certainly give it another try.

I was wrong in saying above that you made a comment about Lyn when you didn't know her and were just passing on what you heard from another guy.  I thought the same thing at the time of that thread, but after looking at it again, I missed the part where you said it was her booker who told you,  so sorry about that.