K-girls

Don't deflect...
sagacity 68 Reviews 5292 reads
posted
1 / 67

Says she's new, but I've seen those pics before. Any leads?

http://redhotk.ch/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=6

 
sag

PS I'm just plunking around here. 5'2" and 125 with a 38 waist is not on my TDL at all. I guess you could say i'm doing only known entities right now. Basically Yuna and Bora. Would be hitting up Kira, but she went on vacay again it looks like. Showed up for a week and has been 'off' for the last three. [sad face]

GaGambler 140 reads
posted
2 / 67

Yes, I agree that she is fat, well at least to a shallow pig like myself, but she isn't quite THAT fucking fat. lol

 
I do have to wonder, if she is not your type, which I fully agree with, why the curiosity about her? I am about as interested in her as the OTHFB working down the street at the local Waffle House.

sagacity 68 Reviews 136 reads
posted
4 / 67

I quote:

The perfect weight to position in what suits you best and with the most perfect hair and features that win me the title of DDG.  
Don’t wait to come see me!  

Stands - 5’2”  
Weights - 125lbs  
Measures - 36D-25-38, ALL NATURAL  

Phone Number: 650-499-9829 CALL OR TEXT  
Schedule: 10AM - 10PM  
LOCATION: N. San Jose  

Stay in your lane.

sag

GaGambler 179 reads
posted
5 / 67

Yes, Toomuchfun might have been a dick about how he corrected you, but it's not like he was wrong. YOU did say "38" WAIST"  

 
Even at a 25" waist, this one looks a little too chunky for me. Ok a LOT too chunky. lol

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 137 reads
posted
6 / 67

SAG, my man... pretty sure those numbers mean 25 waist 38 hips, not 38 waist 25 hips

 
:)

sagacity 68 Reviews 160 reads
posted
7 / 67

OMG. Look what I started. One slip that’s easily seen and maybe commented on, and I’m suddenly clueless.  

Oh, well, stepped in that one.

You don’t happen to remember the pics I’m talking about do you? The ones of her in pink are maybe 2 years old at least if my feeble mind remembers.  

But then, I haven’t seen a pic in the Bay that’s an accurate descriptor in longer than that.

Thanks, RMQ for having my back.

sag

sagacity 68 Reviews 165 reads
posted
8 / 67

Hoof in mouth, for sure. But clueless? Not so much, maybe?

sag

useyrhead 4 Reviews 140 reads
posted
9 / 67

I’ll bet you a soda (Not the Soda that used to be in LV, and might be still) that her waist is a bit bigger than 25. But, as others have pointed out, it’s not 38 either.  

 
All that said, there are guys who go crazy for a D-cup and thick hips. She’s probably right up their alley. And, if that’s you, well, that’s cool, too.  

 
For me, I’ll take the girls that those guys who like ‘em zoftig would call too skinny. Give me a slim, narrower hipped girl every time.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 165 reads
posted
10 / 67

having a laugh with you about your obvious mistake.   Toomuch was kind of mean-spirited about  an honest mistake, so maybe toomuch was too much?  

impposter 49 Reviews 160 reads
posted
11 / 67
Sawtelllestar 34 Reviews 214 reads
posted
12 / 67

Saw a girl using these picks in Irvin a few weeks back. She was gross. Lousy bj, would position herself so I couldn’t get more than half in and I’m your standard issue white boy equiped.

GaGambler 183 reads
posted
13 / 67

and yes, too much was too much.  

 
Even I don't beat a guy up over an honest mistake. We usually reserve that kind of thing for BLRPOS and his friends. Oh wait a second, he doesn't have any friends, what a big surprise. lmao

Toomuch Fun 37 Reviews 203 reads
posted
14 / 67

Sag is.  He needs to "stay in his lane" & perhaps practice the old adage 'if you have nothing good to say, say nothing at all' - especially regarding a lady he hasn't even personally seen.  Otherwise, he should expect blow back ...

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 143 reads
posted
15 / 67

You didn't realize on your own that he just reversed the waist and hips measurements BY MISTAKE???   He eventually caught his own mistake and owned it.  How can that be the same as intentionally posting inaccurate info, which is what you're suggesting he did?  To you think he INTENDED to try to hurt this girl when he made this mistake?  That doesn't make much sense.  

Toomuch Fun 37 Reviews 167 reads
posted
16 / 67

but if he's going to make negative comments about a ladies appearance on a public board he should make sure he has his facts straight.  And, in his first reply to my post he defends his initial post, stating "Measures - 36D-25-38" as though the 38 indicates Waist not Hips.  He only 'owned it' after multiple posters pointed out his misunderstanding of what the numbers represent.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 163 reads
posted
17 / 67

knows the middle number is the waist.  A 38 waist is probably bigger than his,  so do you  REALLY think he thought there was a Kgirl with a waist that large, or he just made an INNOCENT mistake when he typed it?  Secondly, do you REALLY think anyone here is going to say, "I'm not going to see her because she  has a 38" waist because Sag said so?  No, we would go to her ad, and SEE that's its a typo and go about our business to book or not to book for other reasons.  

 
I appreciate the fact that you want to try to save face after your unwarranted attack, and so you are doubling down on your original fallacious point.  By now, you should also realize you are alone in your assertion that Sag intended to hurt a girl's business, or that HE EVEN REALIZED when he wrote it that he made a mistake.  If you have never made a mistake yourself, then go ahead and behave like this.  If you HAVE made mistakes, then you need to cut a fellow monger some slack.  It could have been you, and might be one day.  

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 149 reads
posted
19 / 67

see the irony in saying this after your previous attack and double-down on Sag's typing error?  You didn't really think this through, did you?  LOL

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 244 reads
posted
20 / 67

Sag, she's listed at klovers as Jane dd:

http://klovers.ch/korean-companions-emeryville/jane-dd/

And apparently known under that name at their Seattle branch as well

-- Modified on 5/11/2021 12:43:57 PM

Toomuch Fun 37 Reviews 167 reads
posted
21 / 67
GaGambler 145 reads
posted
22 / 67

but of course YOU are the stuck pig squealing, not CDL.

 
Just take the L and move on. Or of course you can just keep digging the hole deeper and deeper and we'll keep laughing at you the whole time.  

 
NOBODY but you thinks that SAG mixed up her waist and her hips on purpose and to "ruin her business" but you keep on digging if it makes you happy.

Toomuch Fun 37 Reviews 184 reads
posted
23 / 67

misses the point that I don't think Sag posted to destroy her business, just that he was too naive to realize the damage  what he thought was innocent post could do ... but you & CDL keep stroking each other, its fun to watch ...

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 162 reads
posted
24 / 67

It was a mistake and an obvious one at that - 38 is a huge waist size for a woman, especially an Asian one.

 
There was next to zero risk of damage because a 38 waist size is super big and clearly well off for 99% of girls. This was thread was merely a discussion in which the mistake was pointed out. This is a non-issue.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 144 reads
posted
25 / 67

point out his mistake in a respectful way.  You chose to just attack him for what was clearly just a mistake.  If, as you say, it was his naievete, why wouldn't you just correct him and leave off the personal attack?   It seems like you are starting to walk it back a little, so I would keep doing that and in  no time you'll be where you should have been in the first place.   I really am surprised and disappointed that neither GaG nor I turned out to be the asshole on this thread.  Lol

 
Maybe I'm busting your balls a little,  but I just looked back at some of your posts from years ago, and  it seems your normal style is to give orders and tell people what to do.  With that history, one could argue that your reaction to Sag was not anything unusual for you, but your normal "style" of posting. I probably should have looked earlier.  Lol

Toomuch Fun 37 Reviews 187 reads
posted
26 / 67

2009 had to be ... before the kinder, gentler, more moderated days of TER were implemented.  The site was So Much More Entertaining back then!!!  VIPs could have unlimited alias's, and often invented 'classics' determined by the subject of each individual Thread!  Exceptionally verbose handle's like your 'current' one were generally ignored.  Ohhh, for the good old days ...

Toomuch Fun 37 Reviews 179 reads
posted
27 / 67

a space in the handle, you had to be on the site from almost the very beginning for that to have been allowed ... probably why CDL uses hyphens ...

-- Modified on 5/13/2021 7:06:38 PM

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 165 reads
posted
28 / 67

from 2008 had no hyphen, like many of the providers who are less than virginal and have lost their hyphens.  Lol

 
I had 410 reviews on another site that closed down in summer of 2015 under the CDL handle and very few here, so I brought my  reviewing over here and changed my handle to CDL, so the other Kgirl refugees that came with me would know I'm the same reviewer from over there.  Like me, many of them were known by different handles on the other site, but some used the same handle on both sites.  

 
Yeah, I agree the pre-moderator days were pretty wild, judging from the board posting.  By the time I started posting on TER, they had moderators.  What I liked about the other site is you could set up private chat rooms much like the reviewers only board on TER, but the person starting the room controlled the access to who was invited to join the group.  It served the same function as the RO board here, but there were no lurkers.  You knew  who you were talking to.  It led to much more honest exchanges of information.  Would like to see that here.  

sagacity 68 Reviews 242 reads
posted
29 / 67

I think she's JaneDD at Klovers in emeryville. If I'm wrong I'm sure someone will tear me a new asshole, but if I'm right she just got a shitty review today.

sag

-- Modified on 5/13/2021 7:41:51 PM

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 218 reads
posted
30 / 67

Unless youre talking about another site and not the one that rhymes with "tax",
that site closed down by September 2015.  

 
And archives show that on August 18th 2015 there were seventy (70) reviews under the coeut-de-lion handle  That's still a hell of a number, especially for 8 months, but it is pretty far cry from the 400 figure.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 168 reads
posted
31 / 67

you would see the rest of the reviews, but my first handle  included indies and I have already said here last year that I changed my handle on the other site after getting blowback from indies about negative reviews.  (In those days, Kgirls were not following their reviews.)  When I changed to CDL, I only reviewed Kgirls.  I'm surprised you don't remember me saying that here last year.  I was reviewing on the site since 2011 under the first handle.  So let's see, 70 Kgirl reviews in eight months,  not including the indies who I stopped being reviewed under CDL,  then going back to the beginning in early 2011 . . . . . well, I'm sure you can work out the math.  Some off the guys that came here with me in 2015 know the other handle, and have also met me in person.  They are my most trusted hobby bros.  They won't give me up.  Lol

 
Thank your taking an interest in my history.  I guess I'm living in YOUR head rent-free, too.  Lol

 
Instead of the Kgirl board, maybe we should call this board the CDL Stalker Plantation, since I'm so good at growing stalkers.  Are you going linking posts from the past, too, like one of my other stalkers does?  You must really be butt-hurt being put on ignore.  Back you go.  

useyrhead 4 Reviews 168 reads
posted
32 / 67

I guess you couldn’t resist getting sucked in!

 
Do you really think he didn’t remember?  

 
Although this does make me wonder if and where we may have crossed paths before. Probably AF. If I recall correctly, that wasn’t Bay Area only.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 178 reads
posted
33 / 67

Weird, I thought you're ignoring my posts. I guess you're still reading them.

You literally said you had 410 reviews under the cdl handle on the old site.

 
I am neither butthurt nor am stalking you. I just like to fact check. And if you remember, I don't like lies being told. You are welcome for me correcting your statement.  

 
You don't have 410 reviews under the cdl handle on the other site like you've claimed. I am simply correcting you. The great thing about internet is that everything can't be hidden
Hence why I like posts to be public.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 155 reads
posted
34 / 67

You guys both definitely posted on af. Hell, I've read a thread where both of you posted in.  

 
I've also seen a lot of other familiar names. Sixdnine, Valida and others. And yes, it was just a kgirl forum.

-- Modified on 5/14/2021 1:57:14 AM

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 224 reads
posted
35 / 67

It's true that CDL has posted many times that he had 400+ reviews on AF.  In fact, a few posts above he said:
"I had 410 reviews on another site that closed down in summer of 2015 under the CDL handle..."
He CLEARLY stated that he had 410 reviews on AF UNDER THE CDL HANDLE.

 
Your reply questioned that he had 400 reviews under the CDL handle as he claimed when you said: "And archives show that on August 18th 2015 there were seventy (70) reviews under the coeut-de-lion handle  That's still a hell of a number, especially for 8 months, but it is pretty far cry from the 400 figure."

 
The "archives" bit threw him for a loop.  You busted him so he came up with this:
"If I told you my first handle . . . .you would see the rest of the reviews, but my first handle (on AF)  included indies and I have already said here last year that I changed my handle on the other site after getting blowback from indies about negative reviews...When I changed to CDL, I only reviewed Kgirls.  I'm surprised you don't remember me saying that here last year.  I was reviewing on the site since 2011 under the first handle."

 
After you mentioned the "archives," all of a sudden CDL changed his tune.  He went from saying he had 410 reviews on AF "UNDER THE CDL HANDLE" to saying he had a "FIRST HANDLE" on AF.  That's how he accounts for the fact that you only found 70 reviews under the CDL handle.  To me that's BULLSHIT - he didn't mention the first handle until you busted him with the "archives."  Then he came up with the bullshit "first handle" even though he had just said ALL 410 reviews were under the CDL handle.  Looks like CDL isn't too tech-savvy, is he?  He didn't now about the "archives," did he?

 
It's true that CDL says he had a different handle on TER From 2008 to 2015.  But I sure do NOT remember CDL saying on TER that he changed his handle on AF.  He could simply tell us what his first handle on AF was.  That site is dead and gone so it doesn't matter to anyone what his first handle was.

 
Alternatively, CDL can prove he isn't lying about having a different handle on AF by re-posting the post from last year where here said he changed his handle on AF.  On the Politics board CDL said:
"I have more fun . . . .and get bigger meltdowns from BPOS when I post without the link first, so he can say I'm full of bullshit.  Then I ram the link up his fat ass."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/i-have-more-fun------365179?frmSearch=1#365179

 
Here's your chance CDL!!  Re-post that post from last year where you said you changed your handle on AF.  Ram it up my fat ass so you can have a lot of fun at my expense!!

-- Modified on 5/14/2021 3:46:15 AM

GaGambler 185 reads
posted
37 / 67

and that just like all your other "suggestions" to make things here just as complicated as humanly possible, you have gotten literally ZERO support on any of them.

 
I will give you points for persistence however, although I could make an equally powerful case to take points away for said persistence.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 197 reads
posted
38 / 67

I don't really care about that, I just care about setting facts straight.

 
Cdl may have 400 reviews on there, but definitely not under his name.

But it is a bit too convenient, I agree with you about the fact that I don't think he expected the archive to be available. He also told me that he had two terrible kgirl experiences and he documented them truthfully in reviews there.  

 
Well, I've yet to find any trace of those reviews, and I looked because I was thoroughly concinced by his reviews - especially ones available on that site - that he is incapable of harsh reviews.

I guess these are under another handle too.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 160 reads
posted
39 / 67

on AF as CDL, but I  started under my first handle where I put up the rest of the reviews.  Rocket verified the CDL reviews were only over eight months before I came here with my  reviews.  I reviewed there since nearly the beginning of the AF spinoff from CV.  My apologies for the mistake.  I have reviews on TER under another handle as well, like many others do, so what makes you think I wouldn't on another site?

 
Do you remember the challenge you refused to take a few months ago where you  called bullshit that I was posting on  TER BEFORE I changed my username to CDL?  I told you if you didn't believe me, then we could make a bet.  If I posted the handle I used before CDL and there were posts, you would leave the Kgirl board and never post here again, and if I could  not produce the link posts under my prior handle, then I would agree not to post on the Kgirl board anymore.  You would have to agree, as I would, that the moderators would be pre-authorized to enforce the no-posting rule on the losing party.  As I recall,  you made a lot of noise, but refused my challenge and crawled away defeated.

 
I'm willing to offer you the same challenge here, or to Rocket, if he wants to take it.  You agree to be banned from this board if I post my original handle on AF that has the rest of my reviews.  If I can't do it, then I will be banned.  Are you feeling lucky today?  This is your chance to bet something worthwhile to both of us.  Do you have the balls to bet getting banned from this board?  I do.  

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 151 reads
posted
40 / 67

CDL, if you simply wrote that you misspoke in the first place, I would never write that message above either.

 
I don't know about others, but I'm not taking any ban bets. Unlike bigp, I don't really care what handle you used before on here. You misspoke - no big deal. I'd say you doubled down there, as you say it, but at least you admitted what you stated was not entirely true. That's good enough for me. I would like to ask you what those real bad experiences you documented on af were, since I can look at those old reviews on af.

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 170 reads
posted
41 / 67

You post a lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing.  You did it to conveniently avoid proving this statement:
" I have already said here last year that I changed my handle on the other site after getting blowback from indies about negative reviews...When I changed to CDL, I only reviewed Kgirls.  I'm surprised you don't remember me saying that here last year.

 
If you said it last year, you should have no trouble finding the post.  Well, where is it?

Floorhump422 25 Reviews 161 reads
posted
42 / 67

Ban bets? It's not that serious, man. Provide the receipts lol. Apparently, you have the balls to potentially get banned from the board, but not be to truthful from the outset. Interesting.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 175 reads
posted
43 / 67

me to produce the review history.  You said you're not interested, but now you want it for free anyway?  Bwahahahahaha

Floorhump422 25 Reviews 206 reads
posted
44 / 67

If someone would lie about something as inconsequential as a username or their number of reviews, I'm not sure that I could trust them again. What else could they be lying about? If someone were to lie about the quantity of their reviews by a factor of 6, then it follows that they likely haven't seen "over 900 k-girls" either. What a shame. Maybe the true number is closer to 400?

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 159 reads
posted
45 / 67

in your effort to prove that I'm the liar and you  aren't, then say here that you  will accept my challenge.  If you do, be sure to put it in the headline so that I will see it, and then we can see who leaves the Kgirl board.  

 
I don't really care about anything else you have to say, because this is the Kgirl board and you have never seen a Kgirl, so I'll put you back on ignore.  Rant all you want, but if you won't accept the challenge, you are just a child having a tantrum.  

Floorhump422 25 Reviews 168 reads
posted
46 / 67

I thought you placed Rocket on ignore? Let's see those links. I'm curious, as I'm sure many others are as well. Practically, "chomping at the bit" as they say!

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 181 reads
posted
48 / 67

I just needed your confirmation those bad experiences were documented under your other handle, and not the cdl handle.

 
Im fairly confident I can figure out your other af handle, if it indeed existed. After all, I pride myself on being able to get information. I think you are capable of naming your old handle, so why would I take that bet?

 
Tell you what - if I do figure it out, I'll let you know. Not publicly, because you clearly don't want it known and I do respect your wish.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 151 reads
posted
49 / 67

taking my challenge, you'll get the list and this board will be rid of him.  Lol

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 210 reads
posted
50 / 67

Where's your post saying you changed your handle on AF?

useyrhead 4 Reviews 182 reads
posted
51 / 67

It doesn’t even seem to have an actual topic. Or maybe one of the troll posts below actually said something meaningful and I just can’t read it because I have them on Ignore?

 
Nah. That can’t be it. ;)

Floorhump422 25 Reviews 203 reads
posted
52 / 67

You should follow the age-old adage of, "if you have nothing constructive to add, better to say nothing at all".

Floorhump422 25 Reviews 138 reads
posted
53 / 67

Is the child the one who is asking a straightforward question or the one who won't proceed until their frivolous conditions are met? And here I thought you brought your business "professionalism" to this board. Maybe that's just how you act IRL.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 148 reads
posted
54 / 67

what they want.  The trolls want to stalk me to try to discredit me, yet they have never met me, so let them risk something in order to get the info.  They don't want to take my challenge, so I have no obligation to provide anything here.  I view this as is an opportunity to get a troll off of the board.  I'm willing to agree to get banned from this board if I can't deliver.  If BRLPOS wants to call my bet, we will see who goes.  He backed down the last time I made this bet on how long I have been posting here.  Do you think I really care whether Floorhump, one of the new guys, trusts me or not?  Bwahahahahaha  You seem to be way too invested in me, just like a few others here.  

 
A bunch of BA guys came here last year from another site, and I wasn't the least bit curious about reading their past reviews.  Whatever they have on TER is good enough for me.  I think only a stalker does shit like that, and I'm not going to enable the trolls.  If I do, then everyday, we get something like, "You said this eight years ago over on so and so board", just like BLRPOS does with 5-year-old TER posts.  Who cares, EXCEPT the trolls.  

 
You can't dispute that my intel about the business is spot on.   You don't get that knowledge from seeing a few Kgirls. You are forgetting that my CDL reviews here did not start until 2015, but I have been seeing Kgirls since 2008, as stated on the leader board.  Anyone can change their username or alias every six months.  AF was the same.  I have used 3 handles at TER and 4 at AF (On TER they were sequential, on AF, they overlapped), so it  doesn't matter a lick how many of the nearly 1000 Kgirls I have seen are reviewed under CDL.  Many other guys, like Jensen, have more reviews under a former handle than his current one.  Is he lying, too.  

I have been on other boards over the years as well, so my stalkers should widen the search until I completely consume their thoughts. LOL

Floorhump422 25 Reviews 163 reads
posted
55 / 67

I'm not invested in you, believe me. It's just astounding (maybe it shouldn't be at this point) that you harp (haha) on about "credibility" and your extensive "experience" but can't be bothered to provide a link, much less answer what basically amounts to a yes or no question. You even brought my experience into question, which is irrelevant. You're deflecting. While I could care less whether or not you're being truthful, the hypocrisy is irksome.  

P.S. When you say for ages that you're going to place someone on mute and finally "do it", but then subsequently "unmute" them just to argue with them, what does that say about you?

impposter 49 Reviews 172 reads
posted
56 / 67

Other suggestions? Such as X-out-of-Y scoring?  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/suggestion-and-policy-4/did-someone-say-x-out-of-y-scoring-16640  Quite a few people support that idea.  
.
Other suggestions? Such as splitting the totally confusing "Ethnicity" data field with a non-subjective "Complexion" chart AND a "Cultural background" or "Cultural origin" field?  That suggestion has also gotten a fair amount of support.  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/suggestion-and-policy-4/is-complexion-too-complex-for-the-review-form-15848
.
Other suggestions? Such as using a STANDARD CHART of female silhouettes (from fashion design or psychology / sociology / anthropology research) to replace the totally ridiculous and disagreeable "Build" descriptors: slender, thin, average, athletic (Bulgarian weight lifter, Russian gymnast, US track and field. or Canadian figure skater athlete?), curvy (thin curvy or obese curvy?), flabby, ... ridiculous. Ten standard body shapes as silhouettes lets a monger pick a number / shape to describe his hostess. Mongers might disagree by plus or minus one, but we will be rid of trying to describe "slender curvy athletic" with a single term. There has been some support for that suggestion, too!  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/suggestion-and-policy-4/waist-to-hip-ratio-sulhouettes-pantone-color-charts-etc-14295
.
Thank you for the invitation to present my suggestions again!

Posted By: GaGambler
your other "suggestions" ... have gotten literally ZERO support on any of them.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 134 reads
posted
57 / 67

Hold on, so now there are four different handles?  

Were those 400 reviews spread between 4 different af handles? I'm pretty confused at this point.

RIFFRICHARDS 193 reads
posted
58 / 67

Looks like another thread that the little rocket felcher has drug into the right margin. Luckily for me I have him on ignore so I don’t have to read his divisive drivel; I just see his name and that he’s been blocked.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 210 reads
posted
59 / 67
coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 171 reads
posted
60 / 67

intending just to read, so I don't log on.  They are only blocked when I'm logged on.  If I see something I think is dishonest by a troll, then I feel I should at least give my two cents.  Its a blessing and a curse.  Lol

 
As far as my cred, if you don't think I post good info here about the Kgirl scene, don't read it.  Unless I missed something, I  think you're on the East Coast, so the vast majority of girls I review or post about are probably irrelevant to you anyway.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 153 reads
posted
61 / 67

There were actually 7 usernames I reviewed under on AF, including CDL.  There rules were pretty lax, so I had multiple handles at the same time, but not all 7 at the same time.  I'm correct that  there has only been 3 on TER.  My favorite on AF were three that I had almost forgotten about where I used colloquialisms from other countries and/or mixed in foreign words into my English.  Readers totally bought in all three of these that I was a guy from another country that moved to LA.  I forgot  how much fun we were having there.   I'm pretty sure 7 is the correct number of handles used on AF.  

 
Regardless of which handle I reviewed under, all of the reviews were legit.  I really do know that many Kgirls.   I was "cautioned" by AF management a few times about having more than one account, but because I was providing so much  content and not  creating any problems,  they let it go.  Of course, it didn't hurt that  I knew the owner of CV, and the AF spinoff was being run by his sister.  Lol   I've always played it straight with TER.  I've only had one handle and one alias at a time, but I'm  thinking about changing my alias, so that will add another handle that I may review under.  Okay, that's all you get for free.  If you want more, then talk BLRPOS into taking my  challenge.  Lol  Good hunting.  You must have a LOT of time to burn.  Are you retired or just out of work right now?

-- Modified on 5/15/2021 6:52:55 PM

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 188 reads
posted
62 / 67

OK, thanks for explanation. So those 400 reviews are spread over seven handles? Kinda strange that you started talking about one handle, then said it was four and then remembered 3 more. But I guess it was as awhile back and your memory is fuzzy. I hope this is the final answer lol
To reiterate, I'm not taking any ban bets. We're all adults here.  

 
To answer your rather personal question, I'm neither retired nor out of work.

You might be overestimating how much time it takes to run a script that downloads a website archive, and then do some searches on the archive.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 481 reads
posted
63 / 67

my memory is not what it used to be.  We're talking about a time period of 6-10 years and hundreds of Kgirls and at least a hundred indies ago.  I forgot a few things until I thought a little more about those days.  If that's  not a good enough explanation, sue me.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 232 reads
posted
64 / 67

That's fair enough, it is indeed a sufficient explanation for me. Thanks.

kyungjean 6 Reviews 156 reads
posted
65 / 67

Posted By: Floorhump422

   
 P.S. When you say for ages that you're going to place someone on mute and finally "do it", but then subsequently "unmute" them just to argue with them, what does that say about you?
I am sure this is a rhetorical question, but I know an answer - it makes Nail Polish Leona **pathetic**!

igolem3 58 Reviews 213 reads
posted
66 / 67

Agree with most.. don’t ever trust the measurements and images..  only word of mouth is accurate.. otherwise you are gambling with your hard earned $$$

sagacity 68 Reviews 203 reads
posted
67 / 67

Um, yes, I meant hips 38.

What a clown circus this thread became. Thanks to those who realized and stated kindly that I had said waist instead of hips. The rest o' y'all: Really?

Any way, stay safe out there.

sag

Register Now!