Here we go again. How can a girl get great reviews and 8's and 9's from trusted reviewers and the suddenly get a 5, 6 or 7. Yes looks are subjective but I've never seen a K-girl open the door for me who would be any less than an 8. I mean how can a girl with just a nice body and just a cute face not look at least hot at the very least. I've been doing this for years and every time that door opens and I see a girl in sexy lingerie with her boobs hanging out and various other parts of her body exposed and a cute smile on her face old woody comes to attention. That fellow mongers is at least very hot and and no less than attractive. Anything less than that is just not in the world of reality. It's as if some mongers have been having sex with super models and just took a day off to go slumming with a K-girl. Add to that the lack of a shitty attitude that comes with some non K-girls and that turns virtually any K-girl into a treasure. Any comments from some long time or even short time mongers?
Look at the review history of the guy that gave the low score. Some dudes always give a below 7 score no matter who they saw. Some dudes can be trying to sabotage a girl's business. Maybe girl and the guy didn't click at all and lead to a bad and awkward session. Variety of reasons.
I've seen less than stellar kgirls, not total fuglys but certainly not better than my civvie world average. The last below average kgirl I saw had a good body but didn't like her face. I didn't find her attractive and she sensed it. Terrible session, horrible chemistry, I remember in DG i purposely didn't use the mirror cuz I didn't want to see her face. Goes without saying that I didn't repeat yet she stayed for more than a month, so someone must've liked her.
I have wondered the same many times and thought perhaps they had seen too many young DDG hotties. Then I wonder if everyone just have a higher standard than me?
There were a handful new girls in 2017 who were a 10 to me but never want to name them publicly or privately for their looks because of different standards. Personally I have never seen a K-girl who I thought less than a 7.
Or may be I had but then got amnesia from the trauma.
punish a girl on her looks score if they didn't like the service during the session. They are two INDEPENDENT scores. These reviewers that see 8/8 and 9/9 girls don't realize they are neutralizing their review credibility when they give a girl a 6/6. Just because they thought the service was bad for them doesn't mean she suddenly got ugly as well. IMO, most often the guys that punish a girl on looks AND service are writing retaliatory reviews because the girl refused some service that they wanted. Might be anything. No DFK for a guy with no teeth. No BBBJ for uncircumcised guys. No CIM or no BBFS. Some girls limit their menu for guys with hygiene issues without spelling it out for them.
Most of the girls I see are 8 or 9 on looks. I give about the same number of 7's as 10's on either end of the 8/9 that I consider the Kgirl norm. I have never given a 6 because I would not see a girl that was a 6 in the first place. 7's and 10's are mostly girls where I was fooled by the photoshopping in their ads. Sometimes in a good way (10) and sometimes in a bad way (7).
Which is why the numerical system is stupid. One man's 9 is another's 7. I've seen a 7 where the body of the review is pretty good. Unfortunately once some guys see the 7 they just move on and disregard the actual review. One current girl has gotten 8's and 9's from some experienced and trusted reviewers and suddenly some newbie comes along and gives a lower number than I have seen in a long time for a K-girl. Subjectivity can only go so far and if he was punishing for not giving him what he wanted or expected it only proves my point about the numbers.
But I am the lazy dude who looks at the scores and some profile info once I want to see some K-girls based on their pics so I can decide who to see first. Tis rare that a score or review would make me NOT want to see a K-girl; I may put her to the bottom of my list if I believe the reviewer. I had at least one ATF that had scores below 7 in both looks and performance but I saw her anyway and was ecstatic. There was also a current ATF who had 8, 9 in looks then suddenly I saw a 7 in looks. I read it and wondered who he was seeing? Then I wondered if he saw too many young DDG hotties so I check his history and ignore him. Either he got a mirage or I had rosy glasses on. I can't see too well in the dim light LOL.
In all my years I think I’ve seen maybe 1 or 2 10’s In looks: 9 is a damn good looking girl but I eould think the average girl is an 8 or they wouldn’t be in the business. JMHO
I think as a K-girl ages, her number gets deducted a point every 10 years. So if she was a 9 in her 20s then she may become an 8 in her 30s and a 7 in her 40s. And as a monger ages, he adds a point to a K-girl for every 10 years of difference in their age. So if a K-girl is only a 7 in her 20s but the monger is in his 40s, then she is a 9, but the monger in his 30s only think of her as an 8.
My math may be a little off by a point or a half because I am not an accountant. I cannot tell the girl age very well either so I try to keep it simple. A 7 is below average for a K-girl, an 8 is average, a 9 is above average, and a 10 is perfect. That is how I score either looks or performance. As a "short time" rookie reviewer, I am guilty as CDL said of not treating looks and performance as INDEPENDENT scores. If she makes me too happy, I do add 1 or 2 to her looks. If she does not, I give her a more accurate looks score. I even said how I score in my review because I understand if people think I may overrate the girl.
And as mufftime implies, it is always better to read the review because the scores may not make sense.
in your first paragraph. I have to think back to whether I have been guilty of being more generous on looks based on age-DIFFERENCE. It gives me something to think about.
Your rationale on the 7-10 scale is the same as mine, from below-average to perfect. If a girl is below average, no need to rub it in by going any lower, which speaks to Mufftime's original point. Below average is below average. No need to try to hurt her business because the point is made about her looks when you give the 7. We are on the same page there.
I remember one chick that had a body of a 10 but had a manface so everytime i saw her blowing me my boner deflated cause looked like some dude was blowing me and i aint no homo. Just couldnt get past that face. Just incredible how she was getting all these great comments about her facial beauty etc. another one had a bulging belly like some alien was gestating in her gut and was about to burst or something. And she was getting 9s. Or one girl that gets raves about her BJ skills etc and when she blew me I had more sensation from pissing. Another looked like some emaciated chick from ethiopia etc.
So 5 and 6s dont sometime dont seem out of line. Sometimes its legit. So some girls hi ratings I chalk it upto like white dudes who cant tell kgirl age type of syndromes...
But im sorry her midi-cumlorian count was almost non existant.!!! The cum suction force Strong she was not!
You need to factor everything and look for avg and go for it but odds are there will be Kmutant monsters once in awhile. Just unavoidable im afraid. May the cumforce be with you!
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
