Not to make light of the current Coronavirus crises, but I now appreciate even more those thorough scrubbings and mouthwash rinses that are the protocol for seeing most of the Kgirls. They were ahead of their times.

I can't imagine anyone being more fastidious about hygiene than your typical K-Girl. I guarantee you that a K-Girl is going to be a lot LESS risky to see than just about anyone else I can think of.  

Hundreds of thousands or millions in cash have probably built up a natural immunity to money-borne viruses.   For those that haven't, they should just rub some money on their shoulder each morning to create a gradual protection trans-dermally.  Of course, the higher the denomination, the greater the level of protection.  (Everyone knows you get what you pay for.)   This will make sense to some mongers.  

Unfortunately there is no way we can know who has it and who can transmit it to us.  It's not necessarily from dirty cocks where a little scrubbing may help or handling dirty money where, if necessary, we can wear gloves.  It can come from an infected customer who breathes the virus on everyone who comes too close and especially who he kisses. He may have had his cock scrubbed but you can't scrub away the germs that are already inside of  him. Bottom line it's a crap shoot unless everyone gets tested and cleared. I haven't stopped hobbying but I certainly have it on my mind.

Muffmeister:

published yesterday that said the average age of the people who have died is 80, that's eight zero!  I only know one active monger who is over 80, and that's a San Diego guy named "Rockynutz."  I don't think he knows TER is back up yet, but I hear from the booker he uses that he's still active, one or two Kgirls a month.

Please provide the link to that study. I'm pretty sure it is complete garbage.

and you need lessons in interpreting data, Your link did NOT say that "only fifteen percent of the dead are 80 or older" It didn't say anything of the kind. It very CLEARLY said that the "Fatality rate" was 14.8% in people 80 or older, which is a VERY different thing.

Yes, I did misread that statistic.  

Your mistake is that are trying to combine stats from those "infected" with those who died.  That's apples and oranges.  If you look at ONLY the deaths for each age group, you will find that 88.6 percent of the DEATHS are in the group aged 80 and older.  The reciprocal, which includes all of those groups YOUNGER than 80, is 11.4 percent.   This strongly militates in support of the AVERAGE age of those dying being around 80.  The median might be slightly lower.  (You do know the difference between average and median, right?)  Granted, there may be slight margin of error if the groups do not contain exactly the same number of contactees.  I will continue to look for the study.   It was in the news a few days ago,  but the numbers in YOUR link work just as well.  

Where you got your numbers for deaths by age group because I have not been able to get that particular data set anywhere -- just the case fatality rates for the age groups.  

YOUR link, which you were supporting on your last post.  Are you now saying there is a new and improved link you are supporting that contradicts your last link, or are you doubling down that your last link says something else?  You are still trying to bring in the number of infections.  My original posts was ONLY about the number of deaths not about ho many people have been infected.  Why is that so hard for you to understand?

when Cari had me used a hand sanitizer before we did any lips locking.  On my way out, I had an urge to slip the sanitizer that was sitting on the kitchen counter into my pocket. but didn't want to get black listed. LOL

Whenever they are PROVEN wrong they start moving the goal posts and using more and more words and numbers in the hope you will just concede and go away.

The link you refer to does not have any information on distribution of deaths by age or any estimate of the average age.

The first study you found was US only and that is highly skews given most of the case have been in nursing homes and at the start of the infections here. It make no sense to use that limited sample (at the time of the story probably under 2000 cases out of the, now, over 150,000) to draw that conclusion.

make you look stupid, but HERE is the relevant info from YOUR link from YOUR first post.

If you are using that and worrying about making me look stupid stop worrying.

I failed.  That's the way it goes sometimes.  I said three times it comes out the same with YOUR link if you know how to do it.  Say what you want, you're TSTTT.

-- Modified on 3/15/2020 4:42:49 PM

...pure bullshit.  You asked him to provide a link to that university study.  He didn't because he made it up.  You said:
"I'm pretty sure it is complete garbage."  I disagree - I'm 100% sure it is complete garbage.  You want to know why?  Because this isn't the first time he's posted about a "university study" without furnishing a link.  He did it here too:

Ignore, ignore, ignore

But for you statistically challenged, I already told you that the math works with Jensen's link as well, so your point is a red herring.  Just use the stats in HIS link.

But you are so narcissistic, you can't.  You read every word.   You can't get me out of your head, because you are petrified as to what other secrets in your "closet" will come to light.  There are many and we will get to them in due course.  You have come into contact with hundreds of Kgirls.  Very few of them came away with a positive opinion of you.  The negativity you create when you hustle them for discounts removes any chance off you having a real life relationship with any of them.  Either stop being the discount hound, or stop falling in love with Kgirlls.  You can't have it both ways, I guarantee it from the feedback they tell me about you.    

-- Modified on 3/16/2020 3:30:56 AM

Keep dodging if you want to.

on my source.  It was not from a University, it was the Chinese CDC.   These stats show the average age to be about 80, maybe slightly higher.  A minor mistake as to source, but the information confirms the statements in my original post.  I will try to be more careful in the future, but my post was supported by these stats, so to those that called "bullshit", I say bullshit to them.  Its a still a legitimate published source.  

CCDC report does not say the average age was about 80. Look at the report, Table 1.

Its a calculation.  You can DETERMINE that the average age is 80 from the info provided.  You are still talking about medians, not averages.  Medians take into account the size of the sample, averages don't.  14.8 percent of the deaths are those over 80.  13.9 percent of the deaths are below 80 (add up all the percentages).  Doesn't that make the average age of those dying in the vicinity of 80 (or slightly above)?  GaG used a different study, and it showed average age at death was 77+ for men and 81+ for women (more elderly women have died, and the number of middle aged men who have died has pulled that number down when you filter by gender).  That is ALSO about 80 when combined.  

Fair enough, though I don't read Italian. They seem so have a higher average age for death than is true globally and looks like it might be close to 80.  

Do the calculation. Read the fucking report.

Like when a girl's website says one hour is $600 and two hours is $1500.  I don't know about the "trend coming down", but maybe it is, so that just means its a moving target.  I hope it does come down.  Take a deep breath and let it go.  Its clear you are overly obsessed with this subject.  I'm going about my normal life and its having no effect on me so far, so I don't have the investment in this subject that those running around with hair on fire do.  

Rather than deflecting or changing the subject why don't YOU show some math. You won't because you know you are full of shit on this.

Those erratic hourly rate scales always bug me.  I believe they unintentionally penalize longer sessions.  I guess math is hard.
.
Reminds me of the old joke about a contest  ... first prize is a week in (city name here).  Second prize is two weeks.

Detroit?   LOL

When was the last time you saw a Kgirl?   Do you see the irony in dodging my question and then accusing ME of deflecting when I spent four or five posts trying to explain things to you?  You haven't even made ONE post that addresses my question.  I put up several to try to answer yours.  Like I said, you just like to argue.  Now, about that last Kgirl you saw . . . . what was her name?  if you're not going to answer, then you should find a place to hide while you're being laughed at.  

You did not ask me a simple question. You asked me a completely irrelevant question in the attempt to distract and deflect. You never made ANY attempt to explain anything, nor can you.

...who has half a brain knows the answer is Philadelphia.    

...Whenever he can't compete cogently with other posters, he deflects and distracts.  It either takes the form of insulting the other hobbyists or attacking them by trying to delegitimize them as hobbyists.  He's done it to me, you and mufftime.  He lies and bullshits that he "hears" from providers about us.  He's a pathetic loser who can't compete intellectually so he has to resort to insults and lies.  He also does it because he has no "game," as inicky46 is wont to say.  He just keeps repeating the same trite, jejune bullshit because he can't come up with anything original.

Just block the maggot.  That's what many of us have done and it's a fate worse than  death to him.

but complete and utter surrender if you can't name a single Kgirl you have seen lately.  You reviewed Diva.  Did you forget about her?  Oh wait, I asked you to name a girl you saw, not a girl you reviewed.   So why are you even on the Kgirl board if you don't see Kgirls?  That puts you in the same league with the troll, BPos.  Congrats.  

It apparently arose from jokes Fields made about Philly.

Have you gotten that fucking clueless in the past few years. You might want to search on my original handle, which anyone here that has been around probable recognized is obviously related to the one I use now -- but you have to be able to remember back to 2017 and before.

The one that didn't know shit about Kgirls and got called out by just about everyone.  Here a link to an example where you put up some idiot bullshit about NK girls and got called out on it by the guys here who DO know.  Read down through several posts from multiple high-volume mongers and you can re-live the embarrassment all over again.  Enjoy.

-- Modified on 3/17/2020 2:17:08 AM

Yeah, that was some pretty stupid shit you were putting out three years ago.

the ONLY good answer or Lester would have put it in his post.  I have no reason to think you are not correct about what the answer was in the 1930's, since you were probably there.  Bwahahahahha

I never believed it was the only story there but it was during a time where lots of reports about how Kim was using a lots of NK workers in foreign markets to generate cash in internationally useful currencies.  It was still going on until just before the world took a pause and I somehow find it doubtful that that regime is so moral that they would hesitate to use prostitution as a means of generate the foreign reserves.

on your moronic assertions about Kim using hookers to raise money to  make war from guys on the west coast, and the ONLY reason they aren't on the east coast is because his submarines don't have the range?  Did you really believe that they were landing NK hookers on the West Coast by submarine?   You sound like a complete loon.  

Me and my reading attention. Should have seen this before.

What am I doing to deserve the troll following I'm getting?   I'd rather the CDL fan club be a bunch of Kgirls.  Lol

Just put the maggot on IGNORE.   He's  not worth the time you spend typing. IGNORE is the cruelest punishment you can give a narcissistic, loser clown.  Just imagine the look on his face when he realizes no one is hearing him.  WOW

unless he wants to remain clueless.  Where else will he be able to disabuse himself of all of his speculative bullshit about Kgirls?  I still think he's salvageable.  Those of us here with no financial agenda vis a vis pimping Kgirls just need to keep educating him.  It takes a village, remember?