It was tough enough getting 'GFE' defined. I still don't think people agree on a standard definition for THAT.

In trying to define 'non GFE', we need to be specific and avoid the rather vague expression 'FS'.

If I had to try, I'd say a non-GFE provider:

 - does not allow insertion of anything into her vagina (including his tongue, therefore no DATY)

 - does offer a well-performed and highly satisfying BJ

Since her service is already a bit compromised, shouldn't a non-GFE girl go the distance and always make it a BBBJCIM?

I don't think her rates should be any lower than those of a GFE girl of comparable looks, brains, and personality. By this definition, she actually offers added value: special appeal to guys who see her as a 'safer' date. Think about it.

Non gfe in its simplest terms is no exchange of any bodly fluids
I generally charge less for non gfe services as clients are less demanding.
Iliana