Florida Gentlemen: I would like to suggest that Florida hobbyists be a little more careful about giving out 7 - 10s for looks.  I can't believe some of the below average looking gals who get big numbers from reviewers. We work hard for our  money and should be careful not to give bad information to potential clients.

We all have our opinions on what we find to be beautiful.  What you may find to be average looking, is our perception of an ideal lady.

Sorry, Million, you're dead wrong and Mrsilk is ABSOLUTELY right. Sure we all have different ideas of beauty, but our conceptions are not so far off from each other that it would account for some of the ratings here. If we disagreed that much about beauty, Madison Avenue, Playboy etc. would be out of business.

The average looking girl should get only a 5, meaning she falls in the middle with half the girls falling above that and half below, and yet WAAYY WAAYY over half the girls here get rated more than 5. Certainly that is the case with some reviewers, who I would have to think would fuck a knothole.

Also at very very best no more than 1 in 10 should be rated a 10 and yet again WAAYY WAAYY more than that here are given that rating. To me a 10 is a girl who verges on perfection, attractive enough to appear in the pages of one of the better men's magazines. Far less 10% of the girls out there fall into that category by anyone's stretch of the imagination. This suggests to me that ratings should be given more on a bell curve than it should evenly, meaning the ratings should get rarer and rarer as one moves up the scale. Actually, if you read the board description of a 10 it is a "once in a lifetime", which really means no one should give out a 10 more than once. Personally, I haven't lived my whole life yet and I still hope to experience better and so have as yet to give out any 10's. How many 10's have you given?

I agree with the original poster.  Some of the women who are highly rated in Orlando/Tampa - woof!

Sir, I am not trying to be critical, or picky.  But come on, we ALL understand the difference between a "model" in Playboy versus Agnes from the corner deli!!!  I agree we may have a small difference in ratings but, as noted below, some of the Tampa girls that look like Nebraska Ave. types are getting 9s and 10s!  Again, $300 to $500 is a big number for some and should be based on truely objective ratings.  Thanks.

I do suppose some of the girls get a rating they don't actually deserve.  I can almost garuantee that the reviewer bases their "looks" rating on their performance as well.  Or they don't want to piss the provider off to were she won't see him again.

You suppose? There absolutely is. You guarantee that those guys are mixing up looks with performance? Then they need to re-read what they are posting. There's a reason there are seperate places to rate looks vs. performance. To do otherwise does everyone a huge disservice by providing highly misleading information. As for not wanting to piss off the provider. I think that's a big part of it. There's a lot of sucking up going on here.