All of you have read this post and no comments? Nothing to say?

Even supermodel quality girls have pictures that they think are not flattering. They would prefer to pick pictures that make them look the best. That's understandable and very normal. But you have to be careful with not going too far. Even if you could convince the guy (with things like tattoos, etc) that you are the same person, that doesn't mean that you're the same person as you tried to represent in the pictures.

I would recommend posting more pictures of yourself from various angles and in various outfits. It's up to you. But, obviously, the less you share and the more you try to hide, you simply have to expect a small percentage of guys to leave. That's the game that you decided to play. And most guys won't leave, so it might be the right game to play for you.

From a 2012 review....... so this sounds like its not as isolated of a situation as you think.

"This is an extremely difficult review to write because Cece is a very nice, mature woman, but she is not much to look at . . . So I didn't. Her posts contain no pictures, but she will send you one if you respond to her advertisement, as well as her e-mail, and eventually her number. The picture is her, and it looks okay, but clearly hides some of her worst features."

Things are never certain. Two weeks ago, I met with a top-rated provider and it was a bad experience.  I did not write a review because she seemed like a nice person, we just didnt click.  I think she was having personal problems and she seemed like a flake.  So, just move on.

picture

some guys think they are renting a Porsche..when they arrive and see it is a Kia..they decline the ride..

I met you at a meet n greet, I haven't seen your picture, but one thing I know is that you are upfront and a straight shooter. You definitely are not a games player. So I would just move on and take it as one of those things that happen that make no sense.

ChicagoEighty, Axxel, macdaddy1944 and Cubs17 have all made some astute comments about photos as representations of a provider as well as about the nature of these person-to-person transactions.

As some have bluntly observed, this isn't Match.com —and certainly not eHarmony or christiansingles.com.  Men expecting to find true love and women expecting universal and unconditional adulation for their charms via these encounters should at minimum be prepared for disappointment.

That said, pictures can be deceiving to the disadvantage of the subject of the photo.  Odd as it may sound, even a presumably good set of pictures might not suitably highlight attractive features or appealing qualities in a woman or otherwise be a faithful representation of what one will meet.

That at least has been my experience on more than one occasion —so I've had the good fortune to have been pleasantly surprised.  And, on the other hand, on a couple of occasions, the lady appeared just as represented in a picture but somehow didn't deliver the hoped-for thrill.

Not to get too poetic here, but to paraphrase Elizabeth Barrett Browning, "How can you disappoint me?  Let me count the ways."

And it's not my idea of a good time to spend what still seems to me big money in order to come away disappointed.

I view photos as impressions —using them mainly to weed out the blatantly unappealing or fake.  Reading or interpreting a picture is an imperfect art.  In fact, once a photo seems not incongruent with other pertinent information about a lady, I try not to look more deeply into it.  I don't want to start nurturing some ideas about a woman, based on a picture, that may be at odds with how she actually comes across in person and what she will be like with me.

In general, though, shadowy shots, odd angles, and contorted poses do suggest that a woman has something to hide that I'm going to find disappointing.

For what it's worth

I believe you're bringing negative attention to yourself with this post. Just my opinion, of course.