When Christina Valetta visited Chicago at the end of June this year I scheduled an appointment with her and she flaked a few minutes prior to the appointment when I was in my car driving to her Chicago incall location without a reasonable excuse -- which essentially had the same impact as a NCNS.  Then I attempted to schedule with her again and she flaked again.  Very unreliable and fickle.  Avoid.  Or at least recognize the high probability of her flaking on you and proceed with caution -- especially given that I provider her with very personal information for screening.  Never again.

Much appreciated Officer!

Christina sounds like your typical "overrated" provider that does not take their clients schedule into consideration.
Too many good providers out there to put up with this kind of nonsense...

I will not apologize for something that I have done to keep myself safe! Anyone that wants to legitimately get to the bottom of this can.  

anofficerandagentleman posted in a public forum, but to what end? What does he have to gain? I'm sure that many will have their opinions.  Perhaps to do damage to a lady?

Points to Consider?  1. you and your buddies? speculate that I have extended appointments with regulars! Key word  
"speculate" there is no way you or others could know that for sure and a perfect excuse to damage an innocent person.

Integrity? what integrity? there are ways you can provide proof of your claim, if I have your personal info I have not used it to damage you and would not, no matter how bad you attempted to run my name through the mud! That is integrity.  

National Black List ask us, ladies, not to disclose information so that a client couldn't  figure out why ladies do not want to meet with them.  I guess that would trigger speculation among undesirable suitors and I'm pretty certain who you are.

I'm not a big poster and I will not respond to this post again until legitimate information is shared, which anofficerandagentleman will not ( so far ).  

 Those of you that know me or don't can personally contact me and know they will get the truth (of course anofficerandagentleman would have to provide "TEXT & CORRESPONDENCE " to his claims.   Those who do not will keep posting and draw more attention to this, which I will not run away from, I will face all accusations right or wrong and will admit to my wrong doing and face the music.  

It is unfortunate that it has gotten to this point for you, I will move on, and learn from this.  The beauty of the TER community is we are all in this together, to protect, share, learn and make friends.  

Sincerely  
C

I’m writing in response to allegations from anofficerandagentleman which is an unjust characterization of my reputation. I very much want to clear things up. It may be a simple misunderstanding, and I believe it will be easy to resolve once all the facts are presented.

I keep incredible text messages, email records for a 90 days before I purge them.  None of my records indicate that we have had any communication during the time I was in Chicago at the end of June 2017 as stated in anofficerandgentleman’s post.

I’m very good at following through with meetings and have a built a reputation dated back to 2013 with an average rating of 9.49, and 5 stars, there are only a few reasons that I would refuse to meet with someone, here are a few.

Black Listed - by one of the ladies personally, or nationally for Violence or Dangerous Aggressive Behavior.
Communications that compromise my safety  
Violation of my Policy / Etiquette

I want to clarify that I am in no way implying that anofficerandagentleman has been accused by me or others of the above, and only sharing a few reasons I would refuse to meet/cancel a meeting.

I hope anofficerandagentleman will provide any and all correspondence, text message and or pm’s from p411, TER or other online screening assets to verify his claim, So we can resolve this matter.  We should not jump to conclusions without having all the facts.

Thank you and have a beautiful day!

To the person who began this thread I have some questions for at first. Did you pm or email her to work things out even after the second time or did you jump to just doing the NCNS. Providers are human beings, the are no different than me or you. I had an issue about a year ago and I could have wrote all over the boards. I did not name no names and I am for name names if it has to come to this. The reason I did not name any name is because first the persons assistant messed things up for us not the provider. I see Christina came on here to defend herself not surprised that there is a difference in literature. Christina I have never meet; She has family like you, gets sick like you, has emergencies come up like you. I don't know which side to support I was not there or had the communication. At the very least you burnt your bridge with Christina at this point and if a date was to happen it would be uncomfortable. That is unfortunate for you both. Because both of you are probably to really great people and the opportunity for to nice people to get to know each other is gone.

-- Modified on 8/12/2017 7:56:16 PM

They do it to their own advantage. We have no idea what actually occurred because we were not privileged to the occurrence when it happened. Sometimes things happen that are sort of disconcerting and people feel they need to express themselves to regain that lost contentment.

That being said there are things that happen that we cannot always anticipate. What we CAN do is communicate with one another.

I have seen her a few times and have found her to be very professional in replying
to text's and emails. And she has been the same in person very professional and very nice and
fun to spend time with. Perhaps there may be something AnOfficerandaGentlemen you have
left out here. My personal experience's with Christina and other hobby friends of mine clearly
are to the contrary of yours. Which leads me to be suspicious of your story, Very unreliable and fickle has never been the Christina that I know and spent time with or other hobby friend's  
I know either as I have told more then a few guys who have Thanked me for telling them to check her out and they totally agree with my opinion on her.

-- Modified on 8/13/2017 12:27:12 PM

You PM the other day and told me this is a private matter not up for public discussion.  Then why did you post on the boards. Once you do this it becomes public for everyone to comment on.  

It you cannot run with the big dogs then go stand you rear on the porch. Second you can pm me again so I can laugh at you.  

Third I don't care what others think of me because I know exactly who I am. I have made plenty of friends on here.  
 
4th Leave Christina alone she is well reviewed and one has come to her defense.  

Last you should delete this thread and go back to the civie girls.  

-- Modified on 8/13/2017 10:01:32 PM

-- Modified on 8/13/2017 10:02:34 PM

Check your inbox.  First, we are not talking about the review process here.  That is not relevant.  Her positive reviews are the reason why individuals attempted to set up appointments.  We are talking about the pre-review process.  If a provider NCNS and/or wastes an individuals time, then that person cannot write a review.  There is little recourse and those data points won't be captured anywhere and certainly not in her TER score.  Second, it is my understanding that it is against TER policy for me to release PMs or text messages.  Especially PMs or text messages that have personal information. Third, I actually sent both of you information to support what it is I am saying.  For example, would a person know what happens next (after they are screened) unless they went through the process because they had an appointment?  They wouldn't.  Again, I am saying that there are problems with her pre-appointment processes that have resulted in more than one individual feeling as though his time and resources were unnecessarily wasted.  Additionally, it is worth noting that she has a "fair cancellation policy" that states that  ... unexpected things can happen ...  If you are forced to cancel a confirmed meeting with me, please respect my time by giving me at least 48 hours notice. If you do not provide me with at least 24 hours notice, I will charge a fee of 50% of the booked appointment rate upon rescheduling, if you cancel with less than 12hr notice I will require 100% of the investment.      

my experiences with Christina have always been great!

But the bottom line with me is that on two separate occasions she canceled within 24 hours.  Once I don't care.  Twice it bothers me.  Especially given her policy and that I took one of those days off.  Just my two cents.  

-- Modified on 8/14/2017 4:42:26 PM

-- Modified on 8/14/2017 4:46:17 PM

Like some others who have responded, I've met Christina many times and IMO she is the epitome of professionalism in our hobby.   Not saying the OP is fabricating his story but only that MY experiences with CV has ALWAYS been top notch, from the booking to the dates, and even post date communication.  Take this for what it may be worth to those that have read this thread....

Fair enough.  Everyone can provide their two cents.  If anyone wants more detailed information, please PM me directly.  A few individuals have shared similar experiences (elements of their experiences were similar to mine), but many of those people simply don't want to be part of drama and/or don't want to burn a bridge and/or still may want to attempt to schedule an appointment with her in the future because they still think that she might make it up to them next time she visits DC or California or wherever ... whatever ... whereas I don't intend to attempt to schedule.  But I don't want to screw those guys over.  Another person told me that this very provider has been discussed online by several different individuals for lack of communication, flakiness, strange behavior once they got her address, etc.  If you want more information related to those perhaps more balanced discussions, please PM me and I will point you in the right direction.  It is not appropriate for me to discuss that information here; I would be in violation of TER policy if I were to post personal information.        

-- Modified on 8/17/2017 6:18:15 PM

It's tough to assess which TER member's account is fully accurate- but as a 20+ year hobbiest I can tell you that I've been stranded at the last moment with my co*k in my hand more than once -- and it is not fun!!

I hope providers will take us at our word when we say that few things are worse than chasing pussy that disappears at the very last moment.  Seriously, What could be worse?

Both accounts could be accurate.  Just different experiences.  Hit or miss.  Maybe 50% of the time that you provide her with all your information she will respond to your e-mail.  Maybe 30% of the time that you get a confirmed booking you will be left holding your cock in your hand.  Who knows?  Plus it is arguably in their best interest to look like good guys and say good stuff.      

-- Modified on 8/17/2017 6:56:14 PM

-- Modified on 8/17/2017 7:10:02 PM

That at least one of the individuals that rushed to her defense should certainly be aware about previous discussions about Christina's flakiness even though they occurred a while ago.

-- Modified on 8/17/2017 7:05:34 PM

Go find a different provider then.  Is your emotions hurt because she decided to stand you up?  You are trying to pay her to see you.  I guess at the time you had an appointment with her, she decided or had something else to do that was more important.  You can get mad at your girlfriend or wife for standing you up but not a provider.  Yes I know it's a business and all but unless she has a gold bag, find someone else.  With all these providers, I'm sure you can find one that will gladly accept your money.  

It's funny, but I had a similar experience with a different provider.  Courtney Ova (who now goes by some different name).  Saw her once - it was awesome.  Tried a year or so later, referenced prior meeting, and she went a bit wonky on me.  I'm sure she is still a wonderful provider, but got very aggressive in e-mails.  I'd say threatening even - "do you really want to start this with me" or words to that effect.  Again, I was entirely surprised.  I ended by apologizing (because who cares who "started it") and went on my way.  The point is that I believe (to this day) that my one-time experience with her was an oddity.  Doesn't mean it didn't happen, because it did.  Doesn't mean she's not a 9-star provider, because she is.  It only means that for a moment in time, she and I hit some inexplicable snag.  Sounds like the same thing here in this case (albeit two times assuming the story is accurate).  I think mentioning an occurrence, even a one-time thing, is appropriate in this forum.  Let others judge for themselves.  If you've had a great experience, then keep seeing her.  If you haven't, then go onto someone else.  I say thanks to all who spoke about this provider since I have not seen her myself, but will now make my decision whether or not to do so.   Be safe!

In case anybody needs the context. Lol!

Yes, you started this thread and I said that. And if you read this thread again, you'll see why I said that. (In case you can't remember lol.)

-- Modified on 8/18/2017 2:05:58 PM

an interesting thread.  

Basically you are great in every way and he was just posting because you didn't see him a second time? ROTFLMAO

I never get tired of her personality, intelligence, confidence, and somewhat critically acclaimed. No matter what anyone says about her it doesn't topple all these above average qualities she has. We all got vices. I rather a girl who's got some type of etiquette and policy about herself, than one who's just winging it making up different rules as she goes along.

I'd see her in a sec if only she were a tad more.......

Thanks jgalfield for the information.
I have no desire to see Miss Ova as she does not fit my physical or age profile, but I do appreciate your honesty.
Like someone else said...as clients we should never be "afraid" (and I never would be) to call out any  
unprofessional behavior by a provider.

HAGW everyone!

.....but unfortunately there's nothing that governs the acts and behaviors in this regard. I think it has a lot to do with the Lady's value of another person's time when they are depending on her to keep her commitments. In our own individual ways we all can kinda behave like those around us should treat us like the VIP that we are. Maybe she's grown her business to the point where she feels established. That she's not dependent on this ONE client; he/she wont make or break her so she can afford to be a little sassy. On the other end maybe that client is a professional that's worked very hard and in turn would like to play hard. He's offering her a premium to spend her time with him and wants that entire experience and interaction to be pleasurable. It's not like in a restaurant where the steak comes out underdone or overdone and you can just send it back asking for another.  

We'd like to all experience that our indulgences are fulfilling, satisfying, even gratifying. It's difficult to do this though when that indulgence must have a dependency of others. Especially since there's so much variation in one client to another, one Lady to the next. I've said it before we can only control ourselves.  

I tend to believe that the flaky Lady's time management improves when someone else depends on her or needs her. It's not enough to her that someone would like her to keep her commitments especially if she's got something of value going for her. I mean if she doesn't receive that value from you, then there's always gonna be another someone. So it's actually pretty fair when a thread like this comes out, but we'd need many more of them for it to make a change in the culture otherwise it's kinda unfair to blame the individual business ladies thst use that culture to their advantage.

Oh, wait. It's better than it has been in my entire career because I decided to have boundaries and standards for the way people talk to me. And I'm much happier too.  

Interesting how that works.

-- Modified on 8/19/2017 7:57:05 AM

END OF MESSAGE