i thought there were certain standards for review ratings. i seem to recall a series of postings a couple of years ago on this topic. i agree with you though, many times i wonder what the f these guys are thinking.
doesn't some moderator review each review?
on the other hand, i have found on more than one occasion that the cover page for the reviews says cbj or just lfk and then you read the detailed review and a more recent reviewer is talking about her swallowing a whole load or playing tonsil hockey.
guess we all just have to read it all and use some common sense.
it may be good to post here as a reminder. For example, I thought 10's in performance were reserved for those who provided super service for sure, but also greek. But I've seen several top locals get 10's who do not provide greek. Maybe I'm wrong and heard it from another board incorrectly.
In any event, guidelines would be helpful but only if followed or policed, as otherwise performance can then become like looks, purely subjective. One man's 7 is another's 9. I guess we'll always have that.
If I read guideline #7 on performance ratings correctly, a provider who does not provide greek on a one-on-one session should max out at a 9 in performance.
So why all the 10's for those who don't provide greek? Again, no problem but for the consistency thing. And of course, for the fairness to those providers who do offer greek.
Here is the snippet from the Review Guidelines that talks about scoring:
"In order to keep our performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she is willing to perform one or some of the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, and Anal Sex. For each of these services that are offered, her potential max score is raised by one point, with 10 as an absolute maximum.
This does not mean she earns extra points for offering the service(s); just that she is now eligible for a higher score. Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is performed during your session with her. You may or may not be interested in the “extra” services she offers, but the fact she offers them makes her eligible for the higher score."
So, based on the guidelines, a provider can score a 10 without offering greek if she is willing to "kiss with tongue", perform BBBJ and is "really Bi". Note she doesn't actually have to perform them with you, just have them on the menu.
In ref to Seeker's last sentence, and your reply, so you are saying I should give a 10 based on what I don't experience and what a provider doesn't perform with me, based on her menu?
Get real dudes. I think a performance rating should be just that, for performance for that session, not something that's on the menu. Shoot, if that were the case we might as well give the ratings based on their ads.
Sometimes I like to argue a point till the end, so no offense, but this is just my opinion to get the ratings straight. It's all subjective to a large degree, just less meaningful if guidelines aren't followed.
You're totally missing the point. Those extras make a provider ELIGIBLE for a score above 7, but your rating should still reflect your experience. So if you have an off the charts experience and the provider offers "kissing with tongue" and BBBJ, but doesn't offer greek and isn't bi, then the highest rating you can give her is a 9. Likewise, if a provider offers everything ("kisses with tongue", BBBJ, Greek, and is really bi), but you have an average experience, you don't have to give her a 10. In that case she may only rate a 7.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
