Chicago

Re: Question for T0001
2Cupsplease 28 Reviews 1358 reads
posted
1 / 32

Since you seem to imply in your posts that you see so many ladies here, can you share with us why you don't ever post reviews except for the two ladies here that work a "co-op" arrangement?

Are all the others you have seen not worth a review, either good or bad?

Not a flame here. Just looking for some reasonable explanation.

T0001 2 Reviews 761 reads
posted
2 / 32
joe_shabotz 1 Reviews 861 reads
posted
3 / 32

I'm not T0001 but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express for an hour on multiple occasions with many lovely ladies...

That being said; even as a non-regular participant (mostly voyeur) I can tell where you are going with this before it leaves the gate.

As to why one doesn't post a lot of reviews, speaking as someone who falls into that category I tend to let the standing ones speak for themselves as I found them to be accurate without having too much to add.   While I only have 1 review credited to my name, I have been around for a decade spending time with no less than 27 wonderful ladies and a good handful for 6+ visits.

I'm not trying to play Captain Sava** here as I've not seen the particular target you have in mind of your inquisition but did want to point out that there are perfectly legit reasons why such a condition can exist that you are asking about.

Angela_Petite2 See my TER Reviews 1032 reads
posted
4 / 32

I asked the same last week when T asked
me why I set him aside as not finished
screening. Thank you I am glad someone
else questioned this besides me .

Axxel 15 Reviews 1105 reads
posted
6 / 32

T1001 is currently the 3rd most prolific poster on this board over the last 6 months.  T1001 only has 2 reviews and to my knowlege only talks about 2 girls by name.  T1001 seems to have a lot to say but without any real substance.

Radcow 1453 reads
posted
7 / 32

This a trainwreck in waiting. Whether T0001 is a phantom or a shill is debatable is without question. That any of us should care that much is not. So as that he doesn't post false information or other BS, his (her) opinion is as welcome as any.

selfreviewer 737 reads
posted
8 / 32

anyone who is caught self-reviewing is BANNED from TER, get it.
Contibution's to discussions is entirely different.

Summertimeblue 591 reads
posted
9 / 32

After reading last weeks threads, reading T0001'reviews, there is no question where he's coming from (VC).

T0001 2 Reviews 852 reads
posted
10 / 32

the reason you are upset is because VC and I decided not to attend your M&G because of too much controversy.

T0001 2 Reviews 850 reads
posted
11 / 32

if there is any REPUTABLE lady who would like to screen me through RS2K, please send me a PM. Right now I am in between jobs (recent graduate) so I can not hobby as much as I would like but if there is any REPUTABLE lady that would like to see what I am all about, then PM me.

-- Modified on 2/10/2010 10:57:40 AM

Radcow 643 reads
posted
12 / 32

I am aware of the rule and wish it were enforced because self-reviewers are a ballsy bunch. As for T0001, if there is definitive evidence, then I will bring the electricity.

Hardwood469 18 Reviews 720 reads
posted
13 / 32

once got me banned. Took me over two years to get reinstated. It's a serious charge and even a more serious offense. It's a lonely world outside TER. Tempt the Gods at your own risk and be prepared for an unannounced closing of the door if you do.

DoctorGonzo 106 Reviews 587 reads
posted
14 / 32

How could you possibly think this thread wouldn't degenerate into the next Moderator Headache?

The definition of insane is commonly believed to be "doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result the next time you do it."

Well, I'm not insane. Crazy as a Fox, Looney as a Toon, yes. But not insane.

So if you think I'm going to give Chicago yet another warning about the consequences of incessant train wrecks... no, I'm not. It's as pointless and fruitless as getting line early for world series tickets at wrigley field. (and before you explode, i've been a cubs fan since the days of ernie banks reveling in the double header)

And I'm listening to the Paul Butterfield Blues Band. Y'all bite each others heads off, I'm drivin the two lane and crankin' up the tunes.

Elvis has left the building, Nurse Rached is on vacation, its 106 miles to Chicago, I've got a half a dozen CD's (sorry, i quit smoking), a full tank of gas, its dark, and I'm wearing sunglasses.

Image from Las Vegas, 1992

PitchingWedge 91 Reviews 600 reads
posted
15 / 32
2Cupsplease 28 Reviews 673 reads
posted
17 / 32
HangingwithBears 663 reads
posted
18 / 32

There's a camp here who believes that VC and T0001 are one and the same. Let me add to the controversy. I think VC, T0001, and the Pope are one and the same. Why would I think this? Have you ever seen VC and the Pope in the same place at the same time? How about T0001 and the Pope?  For that matter, has anyone ever seen VC, T0001, and the Pope in the same place at the same time? Of course not. They're all the same person, it's completely obvious! Listen, I've watched the Pope say Mass at the Vatican and NOT ONCE did I see VC or T0001 in the congregation. Never! This folks, is the ultimate test. We need to see VC, T0001, and the Pope all at the same time and not through any Hollywood CGI magic. I dare all 3 of them to show up and present themselves to us at the exact same time and place. It'll never happen, you can take that to the bank.

CubbieFan2 21 Reviews 507 reads
posted
20 / 32

Hi PW,

.....team & women!!!! He has hit the trifecta!!!!!

Radcow 584 reads
posted
22 / 32

Curly is a dead-wringer for the current Pope. The only difference is  the Pope has got more hair. This Trinity will never show up in the same place and if they did, I'd bet we'd have more earthquakes in the western burbs and that would be trouble.

PitchingWedge 91 Reviews 1035 reads
posted
23 / 32

but that is one of the best pics posted in a while!! ;-)

Veronica Chase See my TER Reviews 567 reads
posted
24 / 32

I love a good gamble, as long as I know I can win. I am not T0001. As of our last conversation he is now RS2K.

TER has the means to track when its important. I am now putting in a complaint as a VIP memeber of the community to stop the nonsense of the very few with obviously soooooo much time on their hands and...um...Less means to participate it seems.

I'm all in, and darlings the true professionals never buff away all their chips.

Xoxo
VC

Foodyguy 29 Reviews 731 reads
posted
25 / 32

I sure was not thinking chips when VC buffed.

I still question whether the Pope and VC are two different people.  I would guess some of you might have whispered "Oh! God!" when VC was in a prayerful position.

Veronica Chase See my TER Reviews 660 reads
posted
26 / 32

I'm not T0001. I'm not interested in the mindless banter of this board. Oh yeah... Thanks for all the PR!!! I have a bucket of lurkers emailing me wondering who I am to warrant a tag team attack. Thanks and smoochers :))

Radcow 990 reads
posted
27 / 32

The only things that bothers me is all of the NCNS allegations of late. Do all of these guys have an axe to grind with you? You seem down-to-earth on one hand and a wild out of control ride on the other. What are you VC and if I come by are you going to show?

T0001 2 Reviews 508 reads
posted
28 / 32

who is collecting the bet?
That will be the easiest way to win ever.

-- Modified on 2/10/2010 9:39:51 PM

HangingwithBears 1214 reads
posted
29 / 32

In case anyone missed it, my post above was an ironic message about the recurring accusations on this board that T0001 is VC and the implication that VC is doing self-reviews (Mr. selfreviewer). In retrospect, I can see how my post could be taken the wrong way but rest assured it was not intended to make fun of either VC or T0001. It was intended to be a satirical statement about the sad state of affairs on this board where we periodically pick a target and rail on them. This week it's T0001.

My apologies to anyone who thought I was joining the gang-bang.

PP

jmac888 40 Reviews 1001 reads
posted
30 / 32

Just would like to add, I can not and will not vouch for VC as I never met her or attempted to schedule an appointment and of course I never met T0001.  I dont mean this as a knock to VC, I just am not qualified to say either way.

As far as the other lady who works in the "co-op arrangement", if it's who I'm thinking of, I will vouch for her.  I've met her on a number of occasions and she is a class act all the way.  If she ever was a NCNS, yes she should have called, but something important must have come up.  I urge you to try again and give her another chance, you won't be disappointed.

citronrox 748 reads
posted
31 / 32
Angela_Petite2 See my TER Reviews 925 reads
posted
32 / 32

Not at all upset. Had you arrived and came
out to show people you're real there would be no question. But upset ? No.I have to be honest with you I and others have felt suspicous because
you haven't reviewed anyone who is already known.

Also V.C. wound up at the blog party anyway.
SO all worked out for the best as the exact
location was never givin to you as you were suppose
to call for that . But being upset because someone
who is so new didn't show is taking it a bit over the edge.

Just get some reviews up there so we will know
you really are legit. ;-)

Register Now!