Why is it that most SP's hate explicit language?  Is it just a matter of personal taste or does it have something to do with LE?  If it IS the LE thing, I don't understand that either.  I thought LE can't make a flat out proposition "like how much for a BJ".  I thought they have to use very careful language to avoid the entrapment loophole.  And I highly doubt, any SP's not on the level of Heidi Fleiss have the phone lines tapped.

The first time I spoke w/BebeDoll over the phone, she was telling me that she was going to fuck me like a dirty nasty whore.  Major turn-on!!!

I've always wondered why such adversity to the explicit language.

Possibly because BEBE DOLL is one in a million and you are spoiled by her, I know I am. Another possibility is that most women are not "turned on" by that type of language. I think that "language" under the right conditions can be a turn on, Quite frankly in my experence it almost never works the way we intended. Also wonder if responding to "language" would not send the wrong signal (provider to client), just a thought.  Then you have the "900" line question. Does the provider reply and the client is satisfied, all over the phone ? Is a provider offering phone sex, If so language would not be an issue. At this level of provider/client I think this would be more an individual issue. Off the soap box..................mike

it has to do with entrapment purposes.  I know I dont answer explicit questions until the gent has been screened first, then I am all about answering because I know you are safe to talk with.  I want to make sure I meet the gents needs and that is all part of it.

On the flip side, there are a great many guys who just want to talk though too...  I hate it when I go through all the trouble of verifying and then they want to talk sexy on the phone but never schedule.  We arent phone sex lines, we are what we are...  Here to make you happy, in person.  Yummy yum!!!  Time to get ready for some hot times that will be begining in a few.

Hope that has helped to answer your questions babes

Well, I don't get the entrapment thing.  LE can't ask things like "how about 250 for bbbjtc".... can they?  I thought if LE uses any sort of descriptive language or brings up $ for sex then they are guilty of LE and the SP gets off scott free.

It seems that explicit language would be a decent LE check for a provider.  But I do understand the guys who are just out for free phone sex.

It's dangerous, entrapment is often ignored and/or not a viable defense against charges.  It's better to just be safe and leave the dirty talk for in bed.

Also my main pet peeve is that 9 out of 10 times a "dirty talker" only wants that.  A free sex conversation.

Sage is absolutely right.  



Juliane

vivat le nekkid

LE can get away with now-a-days! Check into it- the Supreme Court is allowing all kinds of things to go on with respect to LE that could not have happened 20 years ago. My god dude, don't you remember the recent flak that occured when those massage parlors out in DuPage were getting busted? They actually sent in undercover cops to do recon work and they wound up having sex with the girls, and then they busted them! Now, the cases were ultimately thrown out, but it shows you just how bold these assholes can be. We live in a society that is policed far too much- watch yourselves ladies!!

-- Modified on 10/22/2003 12:51:20 PM

There is no such thing as entrapment with Chicago area LE. They can lie, ask whatever they want, etc.

I've always wondered why when contesting a speeding ticket it boils down to the cops word against mine, and despite no proof that I was speeding, the cop's word wins out everytime.

There must be some cops or lawyers who are fellow hobbyists who have expertise in this area.

Is the fact that with all the crap that goes on in society today- rapes, murders, burglary, gang crimes, terrorism, you name it- that LE spends so much time and so many resources into monitoring what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own bedrooms. This is police state style stuff folks. I find THAT far more offensive then anything that we are doing. As Dr. Phil would say, 'Get real people!!'

Why is it when I contest a traffic ticket and it boils down to the cops word against mine, my word wins out everytime?

yaaawwwwzzza

-- Modified on 10/22/2003 6:45:00 PM

if they want you they will get you, chgo. p.d. has a small unit just for it!!

Personally, I get freaked out when I am asked an explicit question on the phone! If a client wants to know more about a provider they can check reviews. There is no way I would engage in a direct conversation. Besides, sometimes (rarely though it may be) there are guys who just call to get off with no intention of booking. No free phone sex here - thank you!!! lol

and they get away with it all the time.  Personally I would hate to end up in in a situation where I would have to listen to an explicit phone conversation that they taped without my knowledge.

Get screened first before you even ask if it is ok to ask explicit questions.  If you aren't screened by the girl and you start asking them, don't be surprised if you get hung up on.

and you also watch too much daytime TV!

And B.S. Walk's, For If SEX Is All You Talk About, Then You Are Not Getting Any!!