Chicago

Hey Oi812, if you do see her ...
softyguy 9771 reads
posted
1 / 4

... how about letting us (or just me) know about the experience?  I'm a little confused myself cause her Eros-Chicago ad and her web site just don't convince me they're really her, although as said in responsse to the Parkwest 6/28 string below, she's even prettier and more petite than the ad and site make her and not 5'9" I don't think (maybe with her in the flesh in front of me I was blinded to her height, but don't think so).  Anyway, no complaints at all with her in-person looks and attitude, etc., but just wondering about the seeming inconsistancies in the ad and site.  Curious ...

softyguy 9433 reads
posted
2 / 4

My Angelique review is up, and Admin actually left my 10/10 rating as is, which if you read it you'll see defies convention.  You wanted to know what she's like, well, it's all there.  How about giving a bouce back on these posts so I know you're seeing them. And any of you other guys out there, she's the real deal so don't be afraid to ask questions or just contact her.  Just say softyguy sent you cause makes me look awfully good for my next visit, lol.

-- Modified on 7/2/2004 11:49:02 AM

Oi812 4 Reviews 10329 reads
posted
3 / 4
softyguy 8750 reads
posted
4 / 4

Hard to explain, but I'm 100% legit.  Never knew the girl before our date, and no special concessions in any way for writing what I did.  As said in my review, I also questioned the pics being her, but also as said, not to worry because she's even more magazine-cover fine in the flesh.  My reading is that Frazier and I differ as to degree, because believe me, you'd never pass a shot at this girl, top 10% or 20% or whatever.  As for the mood surrounding Frazier's experience, mine truly was anything but what he describes.  She was cute and sexy and attentive and alluring and groping and otherwise very involved and personal in her intimacies.  Frazier sounds a lot more hard-core than me, not that that's bad and sounds like she even enjoyed it, but maybe that drags down the dreamy atmosphere I described.  Where he approached her with direct mechanicals, I romanced her, again as described in my review, and she reacted and initiated fine in return.  And I didn't run into a flat air mattress and all the exertions surrounding that, and that had to have an effect.  BTW, I had asked her in advance about her one bad review (just before mine) and about her pics.  As to the former, she assured me that the guy arrived late and it therefore was a short rushed session (doesn't excuse the matter since shouldn't be scheduling sessions so tightly anyway, but does explain it).  As to the latter, she wouldn't admit to the pics not being her, but did assure me I wouldn't be disappointed (again, doesn't excuse the matter, but lookswise I most certainly was not disappointed so at that point who the hell cared?)  Read the reviews side-by-side and I think you'll see that the difference in our style and approach may well be the cause of our different results.  I most certainly will see Angelique again, my only problem being to hold return visits to a manageable number so I don't lose touch with other of my favorites and don't sink myself financially.  Sorry to see such conflict over Anglique, but she is young and has her rules (no BBBJ and no kissing with tongue, both stated up-front and covered in all her reviews), so these can cause problems.  On the other hand, guys wanting only seasoned unrestricted pros probably shouldn't be calling her in the first place.  And none of this is a knock to you Frazier, so don't take it wrong -- as much as she may have deserved a bad knock from the obviously bad experience she gave you, she deserves my 10/10 for the exemplary experience she gave me.   Different strokes, that's all, and we have to allow for that.

Register Now!