Here is the list of Chicago ladies that received 4 or more reviews in January 2010.

The average score for appearance and performance is followed by the lady's name and link to her reviews.

14 Reviews
7.43, 8.07 Vickie http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=143328

9 Reviews
8.00, 8.78 Robin/Alex http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=19048

8 Reviews
8.38, 8.63 Milena http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=132722

7 Reviews
7.29, 6.86 Tina http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=143771

6 Reviews
8.50, 9.50 Holly Berry http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=124350
8.67, 9.17 Anushka http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=136489
8.50, 8.67 Lucy http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=137581

5 Reviews
8.20, 8.60 Audrey Davis http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=130077
7.00, 8.40 Monica http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=142703
7.40, 7.80 Elle http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=143808
8.60, 6.80 Sunny/Lilly http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=143396
7.00, 6.80 Sally http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=144294

4 Reviews
8.75, 8.50 Angela http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=60590
8.25, 7.75 Sasha http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=138635
8.25, 7.50 Sasha http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=88373
7.50, 7.50 Pita http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=143472
7.25, 7.00 Yumi http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=144690
6.75, 7.00 Susan http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=131058




-- Modified on 2/6/2010 11:36:10 AM

Im not understanding the value of the information.  To those of you who find value in it, please explain how it is useful

The author has taken the time to provide info regarding ladies that are in demand now, not five years ago.

If a provider has many reviews and also a higher rating then I will choose her as compare to a provider with less reviews and less ratings.

So the info is useful...

it seems like Anushka has the highest score in terms of appearance?

Sometimes a lady is busy and gets no reviews and then she is slow and gets more reviews.  here are a couple of examples......

Geanna from November of 2008 through June of 2009 (7-months) received a total of 6 reviews,,,, then she received 6 reviews in August.  August is a slow month!  

Sept through November (3-months) 2-reviews and then in December when it was dead........ 5-reviews.


Cameron, (pictured below)..... in 2007 received 30 reviews over a 9 month period and then last year since her return, 8 reviews over a 12 month period.  She still scores over a 9 average for performance and yet under 8 for looks.  Any of you guys that met her at the meet n greet in December should be scratching your heads with me on all the 6 scores for looks.

The story is still the same..... too many people refuse to see anyone without reviews and the same people refuse to write them.  Thank you to all the reviewers and to those that don't write them (about 80% or more).... stop being so selfish!

And du bist doof! (German accent)

-- Modified on 2/7/2010 10:57:18 AM

Interesting.  I saw Susan several years ago and think she is much more attractive than a couple of others on the list that I've seen who are rated higher so I am surprised at her ranking.

Thanks for the data. Lot of appearance grade inflation. I don't get how some of these ladies are '8s' but I guess perception is the key.

If you are going to ask questions about this kind of post, I've got one for you....how is this whole site have value?

As far as how it applies to you, it may not be useful.  Just like they have stats about who likes BK vs McD's burgers or Coke vs Pepsi, it is subjective but if you had never tried either...you may want to know what the general consensus is.  Also, as MTA was saying, since some do not review, just because a provider has the 'most' reviews it does not mean that she had the most appointments (would be a good thing?...I don't know that anyone would want to be with the most VISITED provider), but if you assume, as he said, 80% of us don't review then that stat should apply to all providers about equally on any given month, so it shouldn't taint the tallys given in these types of posts too much.

What does that all do for you or me?  Nothing, except gather the general info about provider stats in one place.  If the top 'reviewed' provider was reviewed favorably 5 times this month, that doesn't mean she was the best, but it is a pretty good track record as far as TER reviews goes and might garner my interest.  Does that mean that she didn't have 50 other appointments this month that were horrible or that thought she was a dog...nope...that could be as well.  All in all it is a factual stating of TER stats about a group of subjective opinions.  Was so-and-so reviewed the most this month...sure.  Are her numbers the 'best' this month...sure.  Does that mean you will have an awesome time or even the same experience as one of those other reviewers...NO!  

It's like me stating that the BEST colors TER uses on the website are black, white, light aquamarine and tan.  Does that mean that these colors are the best...nope, but if they are the only ones they use...it's still a factual statement...gather what you will from it.

BTW, I'm not sure what the greenish color is up on the tabs...but I called it light aquamarine for the example.  I don't really care what it's called.

SMEGMA!!