Ok, what is the community's thoughts on this:

Submitted a review on a lady, had a very very good time with her -- one of the best times I've had.  I wrote a three or four paragraph detail of our hour and a half together.  Now, I'm no romance novelist, but I tried to convey what a great service this lady had provided to me and what a good time I had.  My review is rejected because "the details of the review do not match the score given".  I had given her 8 on looks, 10 on service (the only 10 I have ever given).

Here are some specifics:
- body to body and privates to privates massage
- Russian
- BBBJ
- LFK and DFK
- DATY
- two pops this visit
- felt like she was really into it and that we physically connected
- nice clean up afterward

Did it feel like a "Once in a Lifetime" experience?  To me it did (though I'm hoping it's not just once in my lifetime that I experience this intense an experience).  I'm a little miffed at the rejected review, but I resubmitted it, giving a 9 for service (though again, I felt like she deserved a 10).

What are your guys' thoughts on this?

According to the TER review guidelines, the maximum score is a 7, to be raised by one for each of the following: kisses with tounge, BBBJ, really bi, and anal. From my perspective, whether or not she's bi is unimportant unless it's a threesome, and anal is just not my thing. Therefore, I could never have a
10, because DFK/LFK and BBBJ are the only things left to raise the score from a 7.

IMHO, the performance scoring system needs a little tweaking.  I can agree with the concept of a maximum score unless certain services are offered, but it seems to me that their need to be more score enhancers than the four that are permitted.  Multiple pops is when it comes to mind immediately as something that should be a score enhancer.

Click on the message below and enjoy....... "Not Really"

I agree with your comments. I think the guidelines are not always interpreted the same.
I had a 10 turned down and could not figure out why and the moderator gave me no reason. This provider did everthing but anal for 4 hours! It was as hot a session I have ever had but got turned down for the 10. I have also read reviews with a 10 that don't seem to be as hot as my experience

I saw someone who was quite clearly a massage provider and not an escort provider, yet they hold her to the same standards, suggesting I add any details about any specific services provided - BBBJ, touch pussy, etc.

Sounds like either they don't want multiple reviews of the same provider or maybe they're just tired of doing the work they're supposed to do?

This is a review site and if the guidelines are such that they don't take the details of the reviews into account - only a rating system - then the really important info will start to go away.

A rating system does not tell you if X number of people hit it off with that provider, or if the provider is starting to enter a slump or maybe is changing their services.

Especially since the ratings never seem to change once they are entered during the first review.

It's not a perfect system, and there may even be multiple reviews on some ladies, but at least the info is out there if you take the time to use the system the way it used to be intended.

This focus on kowtowing to ratings only seems to be counter to what this site is all about.  Too bad, because it will drive a lot of us away if we can't trust the info.

It's pretty stupid when the review process is supposed to be about YOUR experience with someone, yet they try to hold you to OTHER PEOPLE's experiences or expectations.

I don't do reviews anymore.

I used to do reviews (under a different name) and they wanted either penthouse forums or is it wasn't what they wanted to hear they would deny. We shouldn't be censored.

So I stopped...

Your better off here.

SP