This is the entirety of the 'juicy details' section:
----
From the greeting I know I was in for something special. Her touch will drive you wild! Her massage was so sensual the way she worked her oils, fingers, and body it forced me to give up all control and just let her have her way. I won't go into details but let's just say when we were done I felt like I had just been with a long term lover. I can't wait for her return trip back!
----

How is it allowed that "I won't go into details..."
That is exactly what is supposed to be required! It seems to be more and more random what reviews get accepted and what reviews get rejected for the most specious of reason.

makes me think it is a false review.

There are other reviews written for this gal.

I think you might find out more reading them rather than trying to be the review police.

Apparently since the review was looked over and allowed the question you asked has already been answered, hasn't it?

What I mean is one of the people TER has to review the review, reviewed it, thought it was acceptable and let it be published. That is how it was allowed.

Not trying to be disagreeable just not too sure what the issue is.

Think the hobbyist wrote about what he experienced with his time with this woman, did not know what you wanted him to write, I guess.

but it may be that the provider or the the reviewer did not want to go into a play by play. If the reviewer filled out the questionnaire properly, he really doesn't need to give a blow by blow. Also, when reading those who give a pump by pump of the situation, you must know that YMMV greatly from that guy and if you bring up, "Well for JoJoMouth2Big on TER, you did this..." she'll probably kick you out of the room and put you on a blacklist somewhere. So, if you are looking for a lick by lick description, you might be better off reading from the many erotica blogs around.

Just IMHO,
innuindos

Both you and shift missed the boat on this one. Its not about me getting my rocks off reading a penthouse forum FFS, or that other reviewers gave details of the same provider (heck, even this reviewer gave details in other reviews).

There is a reason the section is called 'juicy details' which is supposed to differ from the 'general details' section. Go read rule #10 on submitting a review, which specifies how to fill in the juicy details section. So when you state reviewer "really doesn't need to give a blow by blow" that is wrong. It specifically is stated he does, even using those same words: "go for a blow-by-blow tell-all of your session" in "graphic emotional and sexual terms." Otherwise its nothing beyond, "gee, I had a nice time."

My point was that others have complained they've gotten reviews rejected and given the reason that they did not have enough details, even when they thought they were quite detailed already. Yet here is one that cannot be interpreted as being detailed at all, especially since reviewer even states he won't give details. If that one doesn't get rejected for not enough detail, then no review ever should.

I've had a review that was at least five times as long as that one get rejected for "not enough details" before, so it really seems ridiculous and annoying that this one was accepted.  I submitted a problem report on it after I saw your post asking them to please double-check that it met their guidelines, but today it came back Unapproved so I suppose they disagree with us...but I don't see how.

I just had Fake posted that said I smelled, & faked it all. I have never met this person! .. How BS is that! Plus I was told it was posted by another provider.. Also I have not been in a hotel since before X-mas! I asked to have it removed! Man are we going as low to back stab again>???

Zisk, for starters thanks for not taking what I was saying the wrong way and geting mad and blasting me.

What I guess I was trying to do was help maybe in a way keep you from being upset about this kind of a thing.

TER has different people checking reviews I guess and they each have a way of interpreting what goes for a passable review or not.

The only way they could have the same all the time is to have a computer check it cause even if they only had one person reviewing reviews their mood could change from day to day.

One day DATY needs to be there one day no Daty required!  LOL

So what I was trying to say was if one review is not all that informative you can check out a potential provider with the other reviews they have had written about them.

Anyway, hope that clarifies what I was trying to do which was to maybe help you not sweat the small stuff.

You know like if you are in a bar and a gal you go up to and ask if a bj might be possible. She says "No way" and you say "NEXT"!

The thing is if you get bummed out with a "NO" then you will not end up with your pecker in a gals mouth! Now isn't that REALLY the goal here?

Shifterp OUT!