http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=887031

Everyone knows that RSG doesn't provide outcalls.
So of course I glance at his other reviews.
Conspicuously two a month.

Fake reviews are getting past the censors more and more daily and it is wholly bothersome.

Correction: two or a few a month, but still suspicious because that review is so clearly fake.

....Accurate info on the review format is discouraged and generally not accepted.   Every review I have ever tried to write has been rejected so many times that I just gave up.  Oddly enough, most all of the attempts were to post favorable reviews, but I just could not find the formula that would be acceptable.  So faking it might just be easier than presenting accurate info.

a week or so ago with a lady I spent a weekend with.  We went to a Florida strip club, and the dancer began "relations" with my date, which I loved.

When I wrote the review, TER insisted on it being a double.....WTF?  I went back & forth, insisting that one lady was a dancer, not a provider, until I finally gave up and rewrote the review.

and I have had those problems too. That said, I think having to fit it to a format takes the "excitement" out of the review - but I think the most important reason to write a review is so that new men seeking the woman in question have a recent idea as to what to expect: does she still look like her pics (esp. as providers continue to use pics from 4 years ago !!), does she still do what she used to do, etc.

From that perspective, i think the TER reviews still work. That said, I think you need to look at the number of reviews each author has - to get a feel for what is a "real" one or not.

GG

Amazing?? I also have had detailed reviews bounced back for lack of detail. How did this guy get his thru the system??????

Seems like the incentive of free 15 days for a review will encourage more fakes.

Thanks for finding that and putting in a problem report.