I recently seen shannon from room service and she is described as 34-23 -34 and allthough she is a nice girl only the first number is accurate,how can you not be disappointed when you walk in the room, she really is a bbw and the measurements are so much larger it is not even close.As clients are we fools or have we been treated this way for so long we are expected to believe the b.s. sent our way ?

Shannon a BBW? that is the silliest thing I have ever heard!! She may not be a petite little thing but a BBW, NO WAY! Shannon is a size 8-10. That is very far from a BBW! She is tall and has gained a little weight but you are being rediculous.

Jill

Twenty-three(23) ladies listed, twenty-one(21) with photos.  

I wouldn’t have taken those odds.  

Sorry to hear about that anyways.

a 23 inch waist is a tiny waist. if you describe a girl as 34-23-34, the hobbyist is likely to expect a very slim, petite girl. if the girl in fact is a tall size ten, there is a good chance the client will be disappointed. size 10 a bbw? of course not, that is ridiculous and insulting. but he's annoyed that he bought something that was NOT as was advertised. 34-23-34 a size 10? i think not.

i don't mean to be a dick. i think you run a good service and i have a lot of respect for what you do. i think most of your girls get at least good reviews and some get excellent ratings. so why not get out a tape measure and publish the real measurements?

there's an agency in my neck of the woods that advertises several of their girls with 21 inch waists. christ, i don't know whether to hire them or buy them a sandwich

I do not pretend to know dress sizes and do not mean to slam r.s. in particular but it has happened so often wih all the local agencies with regard to false descriptions and in some of the more seedy agencies fake pictures I end up thinking that clients in general are thought of as total fools who will accept anything. hey a size 23 waist is what her discription said and maybe a bbw is implied as being huge wich she is not but her measurements are way off the description and very misleading.She is attractive in other ways so why not simply give an accurate discription.

I was disappointed with Shannon too. I brought a couple of things to Jill's attention about her but she is still with RS which is a surprise to me. One thing I learned is not to take my chances. I won't see a provider without looking at her picture first.I can see why her picture isn't posted now.

now thats funny !!! hire them or buy them a sandwich,  hilarious!!!
Sonny

I've used RS before and never been disappointed. BUT--there is a pretty clear line between "marketing" and "truth in advertising." I'd be pretty hacked if I thought I was buying time with an apple and got an orange if you know what I mean. I think Jill (and all other agencies) would be well-served by updating all relevent stats. This only points out the importance of reviews. My two cents.

I thought it says 'baby fat' in the description file?  Anyway,  I think attitude, service and anything from the waist up is what matters to me.  Just a personal opinion.

I have seen shannon and she is definatly not bbw, she may not be svelt but she is very pretty, stop being petty you either like her or you dont.

I have never meet with the lady in question but if you are paying for a 21" waist thats what you should get

its like you order a prime rib and they serve you ground beef

remember customer is always right and that term BBW is used to broadly maybe plump would have been a better word

By looking at Jills websight and reading all the girls reviews she seems to run a good operation

also remember this what you paid for dinner
maybe next time try something a little more up scale if you want perfect like from the porn star board
thats all
col hogan

 Measurements are not the only places where numbers are smaller then they should be. Age is also sometimes misinformed.

 Also remember, pictures are generally undated posed professional photos. So they too are to be taken with a grain of salt