The hobbiest who initially reviews the girl is the one who supplies the info to their TER profile page.  Now I know on a couple of ocassions I have seen a girl and know that she's only about 5'2" and yet her TER profile page lists her as 5'6".  I suppose I'm asking this as I am thinking of setting something up with Ana Vixen as I love petite busty women.  Her profile page lists her as not having breast implants yet from her photographs, it looks as though she most likely does.  And I refuse to see providers who are not all natural.  I suppose I could just ask her but just the way I am, I feel as though I would be acting in a manner that is too forward.  Any comments?

The profiles are as accurate as we make them.  The initial reviewer fills out the profile but subsequent reviewers can file "problem reports" to update information that is not accurate.  It is entirely possible that the woman you are talking about did not have implants when her profile was first generated.

For what its worth I think you are missing out on some great ladies by picking your dates based on implants.  A few years ago I saw a new agency girl who's profile said she did not have implants. Well, to make a long story short she did actually have them but she was an amazing woman who quickly became my ATF. You never know where the next great lady will be coming from.

Is the data adjusted after just one report, or does it take two or more to trigger a correction?  Has anyone carefully tracked whether errors languish or get fixed?

You really are missing out on some great ladies with your refusal to see them based on something as superficial as implants. Try looking a little deeper. Yes, we're all here to get laid, but what you are missing can be so much more than just getting laid.

My profile info has been changed/added to, appropriatly,pretty efficiently, too! eom

if you submit a problem report, it is usually looked at within a few days. If you show proof of the correction, it gets corrected immediately. If your report requires them to research the issue, it may take longer, occasionally not getting addressed at all.

For the most part, if your report is succinct and valid, the change will be made.

Unlike flagging on cl, it does not take a certain milestone or number of reports to get something fixed.

Hope that helps