Codpeace writes some great one's.

A little long on some of them, but with great details.

His reviews are epic!  LOL.

http://classic.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchbyreviewerResults.asp?MemberID=519726&Membername=codpeace

But for my less heroic tastes/adventures, i find that "Retirement" has a very equivalent likes/dislikes, so i check out his grading for women I haven't seen that he has seen.  For the few women that we both have seen, he gives them similar scores as I do.(for the record, he must be a cheap bastard too!)

http://classic.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchbyreviewerResults.asp?MemberID=972569&Membername=retirement

I like reviewers whose profiles clearly indicate their taste and describe deviations from their preferences.  If a client is able to align his taste with another because his review profile is clear, concise and consistent I think that is a positive contribution which alleviates some of the effects of review inflation.

BB7353 is a Boston reviewer who comes to mind.
A review like his of me isn't necessarily my favorite but it is the kind that I think lends validity to the profile as a whole and I remember appreciating it when it posted.

When checking out a reviewer writing skill generally makes very little difference to me though ignorant or emotionally abusive reviews would give me pause.
If someone gives me their handle and tells me to check them out I usually take note of the client's general style (if he's aggressive or passive, prefers GFE or PSE, lays emphasis on companionship and sensuality or creativity and adventure), what amenities and niceties mean a lot to him, his taste in providers and the overall tone.  If I'm uncomfortable and decline I will explain why honestly when prompted.

My runner up would be JimiFoxx.  He won my heart when he referred to Jayda as a "moon child" and again when he called me an Earth mother Madonna/whore.  Periodically I check in on his reviews because I think they're as sensual and beautiful as they can be considering the requisite descriptiveness.

Here's a topic for discussion:  Which VIP members write the best reviews?  The most informative?  The funniest?  The most graphic?  When you see his (or her) review, is that enough to convince you that the subject of the review is the real deal?  Providers are more than welcome to join in -- if you are doing your due diligence on a prospective client, does writing skill make a difference to you?  Let's exclude the wannabe porno writers ("She placed her tulips on the organ," etc.), unless they show a sense of panache and humor.

1.  Do they have a sufficient number of reviews (i.e., so that they are both experienced, and also not a shill)?
2.  Are their reviews sufficiently detailed?  Does it read as though a) it really happened that way, and b) they know what they are talking about?
3.  Do they have at least a few "white list" recommendations from known escorts?  (Not mandatory, but useful as a screening element.)

This is more of a suggestion on how to screen reviewers than names of reviewers.  It's how I evaluate reviews when I am checking out an escort's reviews.

I knew I could count on Ally for a good response.  Thanks for your input (no pun intended!).

hes retired but his reviews were funny.

doc

Sorry Ally.

We are humans.. even if 30 mins.  Stereotyping for a  pattern?

http://classic.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchbyreviewerResults.asp?MemberID=16025&Membername=pauliewalnuts

Like you mentioned, there are a lot of categories here.  One you did not mention, is the "connoisseur award".   These are the guys that do the research and pick out gems.

One guy whose reviews I follow is "SUPERBANKER".  He is really picky and schedules 4 hour dates complete with hor d'oeuvres.  For me, this guy's recommendation carries weight.  Almost immediate to-do list consideration is awarded to his reviewees.

For me writing skill does make a difference in judging a reviewer.   The basic stuff counts here.  I particularly despise reviews that don't use line breaks.  

I tend to like my own reviews quite a bit.  I amuse at least myself with them and they're about as graphic as they get.  If I had more skills in bed, the reviews would be even better.  Some of my reviews read like Peter Gammons' Diamond Notes.

I've probably read over a 1000 reviews by now.
Overall, I found that a LOT of reviews are entertaining.  

Thanks for the tip, I will read more of codpeace's reviews.

Think Highly of your Reviews, Red, eh! LOL!  But really, "Peter Gammons' Diamond Notes"???

I actually agree with you.  I enjoy rereading some of my reviews as well.  It generally makes me want to see the lady again, which I tend to do.

I'll have to check your reviews out to see if you're the Carl Hiassen of the TER Review Board.

You might not know but i check out gal and ask myself, would i do her (i know i'm horrible and yes i am really bi). What i have noticed of reviewers that have lots of review, some like curves others like skin and bones,others bbw. one is not better than the other, just individual preference. but my point is, the reviews that say like ultra thin type of girls, a 8 or 9 to him is likely not an 8 or 9 to a guy that likes curves. so i try to determine which three of the type of reviewer he may fall into, i try to determine which type of  i am looking at and the girls he is judging to skew (up or down) my personal estimations when i am checking out a gal(s).