I recieved the following reason for dissapproving a recent review of a doubles session with two local Indy ladies.   In the review I used the word Slut twice in the Juicy Details section which is reserved for VIP members only,  This review was not degrading nor was it negative in any way but rather a accurtate description of the session had.   Having been a PAYING member of VIP fo years and never depending on writing reviews to get free mmebership i feel that this Moral control of the Juicy detail section is totally unwarrented.  Anyone wishing to read this review I will replace the review and substitute the word Angel in place of the word I used that was so considered by the Admins as degrading to these women.   Will TER soon be "THE EVANGELICAL REVIEW".....HELLO!!!!  I may have been missing something all these years but I thought the purpose of the reviews was to give an accurate description of your experience.  Am I correct on this?   Would love some other views.  If this post gets allowed.

status:  Unapproved  
reason:  Your review contains abusive language that is not allowed in reviews on TER. Words such as "bitch", "slut", "whore", and the like should not be used. Reviews, even negative ones, should not be overly harsh or degrading towards the provider.  
reviewed by:  ENG919

They gave you a very clear explanation, including the specific word not allowed.  Just follow the rules.

For example you can say "she could suck the chrome off a trailer-hitch"...but you cannot use the words slut, bitch, or whore.

-- Modified on 8/20/2009 8:38:12 AM

I think that slut is about a six on the offensive meter, so keep it down to a five next time.

"Lady of pruient interests"  is a bit wordy, but gets the point across.

Is not the only site that places restrictions on the use of certain language that might be considered abusive by some of it's members.  

The word that TER asked you not to use would be pretty much unnecessary in any sort of accurate description of the activities that take place during an appointment.  The word really only applies as a subjective value judgment of another person which, again, is really not pertinent to the review.

...but honestly, I wouldn't very much like being called a slut, whore or bitch in a review or in person.  Of course, I wouldn't presume to tell you what to say in a review - it's your review.  But I can understand why TER would not want to see those words in there for 2 reasons:  1) it can be seen as degrading and 2) I suspect several providers would be in an uproar over that and then "staff" would be dealing with a lot of doo doo from their end.  AND, as has been said, it is not a necessary part of the review itself.  Happy Hobbying! Erica

You are my type of prude!!

don't be such a c**t.

Just kidding, sorta - I couldn't resist

I may have a Prick, but I am most certainly not one.

I don't know, man. It doesn't seem like a hardship not to use words women find offensive. It's not like they're asking you to use medical terms or lie about what you were doing.

Keep your powder dry for something worth fighting about.

Yeah - knock that shit off...I know some women who ARE sluts, but none who would like to be KNOWN as a slut

I can be a real prick...

Rule #2 of General Review Rules

Be fair and honest in your reviews -- this is what the providers do for a living. PLEASE BE WARNED: We will not post any review that slams or denigrates a provider, nor will we post reviews that contain such derogatory terms such as: Cunt, bitch, slut ­ or any politically inappropriate wording that might hurt someone’s feelings.

Having read this, it implies that the use of the words might hurt someones feelings or may denigrate a provider or be derogatory towards a provider.  Well if a word is used in a sentence that is none of the above and is obvious from the reading of the context. then the word should not be a problem in a "juicy Details" section of a review.  The rule #2 starts by asking the reviewer to be Honest.

This i do not understand. Search posts for word "slut"  and you will get many hits in the discussion board threads which are open to all viewers.  The word used in a "private priviledge such as VIP" which is Paid for is not allowed.  I just don't fucking get it I guess.

Finnaly,  A lady could have 40 pages of reviews (ten a page??) of her history of doing everything under the sun for a buck, should we refer to her as an "Entrepreneur or possibly a smart Capitalist rather than "Hooker" or as some see it she is slutty and could be considered a whore.  If members get offended by seeing or reading these words simply because of their meaning.  Well like anything else "Don't read it"  

Thanks for all the opinions and interaction on this.  I just wanted to voice mine thats all.

...we referred to them as ATMs or Johns or tricks or suckers rather than clients or patrons and attached that to a ever-lasting resume of their hobbying.  One that is researchable and viewable by anyone on the boards:  providers, hobbyists and lurkers.  I mean they pay for sex don't they?

I don't think that way and don't think it would be cool or necessary either.

Well you can call me anything you want as long as you do me, and take your fee. No need to Sugarcoat it..  some of us prefer the sex raw and carnal..  sorry.