I would love to do a chat on this topic. What do you think?

Is it too hot? Would people be brave enough to speak their mind?

thirsty  

We service a fair number of guys (black, indian, middle eastern) who have been turned away by other massage providers and escorts. Sure they get a bad rap for hygeine or bad attitudes with women, some of it derervedly, but who cares?

As to the post in question- the poster sounds like a typical commie liberal drone. Whatever happened to FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION? The provider in question is free in my mind to categorically refuse service to whatever ages and ethnicities she chooses. If prostitution was above ground in Massachusetts, there is little doubt that affirmative action laws and anti-discrimination laws (also known as anti-freedom of association laws) would creep in and corrode the scene worse than it already is. The poster here, like all commie liberal drones, knows whats best for people (ie forcing them to associate with people they simply choose not to associate with) because its "for their own good" and would help them "grow as a person". Lets leave socialism and liberalism out of the massage and escort scene and inject a little more red, white and blue Americanism!

Maybe she mistyped and meant "Angelo," she's being very specific.

It is that she only sees men over 40?  Or only if they're Anglo?  Aren't both criteria a matter of personal choice?

We may think she's narrow-minded, but escorts -- unlike taxicabs and your local electric utility -- are not obligated to serve everyone...

Have fun, MG

Mel aka Ayoungblackwomanhere I also feel that a woman should run her business, any which way, that she wants. It doesn't neccesarily have to reflect society's view (No-the lady in question, doesn't reflect my view). We all need to remember that everyone has preferences. Some may choose to live by their preferences, some may not. In my case, I cater  men of all races, colors, creeds, disabilities, martians, big, tall, small, medium, I could really careless, as long as he is a gentleman with me, from the beginning to the very end of our meeting But it doesn't mean that we should do a "witch hunt" of any person, who feels a certain way, either. Every single person who posts on this board, has preferences, in one way or another. We have been discriminated against, at some time in our lives, maybe for the way we look, to how we speak, to how we dressed. But the key is to remain in control, and rise above it, and go about your business, and also in some cases, take your business elsewhere, where you will be appreciated. As for the comment's made by "None-White", it really disgusted me! For he was doing the very same thing, which he accused the lady in question of. I also, want to state that NOT all of us African-Americans feel that way.  So, lets all take a look at ourselves, before pointing a finger, for we are not perfect in any way. Also, we must learn to accept people, regardless of what their personal views may be, for it doesn't correct the situation, either. Anyways, just my 0.02 cents.

Mel



-- Modified on 2/11/2004 6:21:40 AM

Martian's.......you kinky freek you! *wink*

I agree doll a provider does not have to service anyone she don't want to. Everyone has a right to their preference.....whether or not anyone agree's with, it's her right. As for me I stay far away from martians! ~Big hug's to my sexy friend~ Love ya, Chrissy

Martian Love-damn skippy, I would LOL

even if he came with 10,000 antannaes lol As long as he can use them (and not go anywhere near my back door-that is when I become very vanilla LOL), then it's all good with me, babygirl meowwwwwwwzzza

Mel

-- Modified on 2/11/2004 6:30:52 AM

Well put, I beieve this age of political correctness has gone a weeeeeeeeeeee bit too far !!
  imho...as i have staated before , us guys PRE-screen before the gals, we dont like what we see , we ove on !!...ie: big tits , little tits , bbw,thin , blonde , brunettes..ect, ect, ect...its called PERSONAL preference.
 the girls not being selling coffee or (taxi rides) they are offering the ultimate intimate encounter. because they are selling are we to believe they dont have limits or personal preferences of thier own ??
 because some gal decided to save some guys some time and list her preferences , it causes a thread and a chat (i think) session, how very sad, it really boggles the mind.
  i guess when i see , after a hobbiest sees a provider and he goes back and explains  to the 10-20 providers (total B.S. wont happen) why he passed over , bypassed, eliminated, them , i might see a issue ,till then the whole issue is a crock

Someone has a personal choice, regardless of where that choice originates.  It's their body.  At least she states what her preferences are up front - would guys prefer they schedule with her then get turned away after having made time to see her?

When a man walks into a public place, like a bar, and sees a female that interests him, what happens if he finds out she's got a preference which does not include him?  Is she automatically obligated to be interested in him because of equal rights?  What is stopping that man from seeking out another woman who might actually prefer to see him?

What's next?  Affirmative action for escorting?  "Sorry, I can't see you today because you're white.  I have to fill my quota of Asian and Latino today."

In case anyone thinks this, I'm not a racist at all.  Total opposite.  But I do believe in the right of personal choice and don't get upset if an individual has a different opinion than I do.  If someone wants to change the opinions of others, it's better done on a larger scale.

I saw correlations to this that an escort is providing a service and, therefore, must be blind to race, creed, or otherwise.  How stupid for those people to talk about it as if these women have no connection with their own bodies or have no right to seek that which they prefer or that which they find the most pleasure in, regardless of where that choice comes from.  They are not obligated to do take anyone's money for any reason they decide.

Why would a hobbyist want to see a provider who -- for whatever reason -- makes it clear that she would prefer not to see him?  Does anyone really think that's likely to lead to an enjoyable session?

With all of the choices available, it boggles my mind that someone would want to do this.

Just my two cents...

Have fun, MG

This question has snowballed across TER. For better or worse, I'm responsible for that. As I read the various threads, I haven't found anyone who is taking the position that they still want to see the ladies who do not wish to see them. The question that these gentlemen are asking is, "What motivates you to have such a policy?"

thirsty

It seems to me that the real point of these posts is not, "What motivates you to have such a policy?" but rather, "How can you justify having such a policy?"  And the tone is not, "Please enlighten me!" but rather, "How dare you!"

If so, then they are effectively arguing that the lady does not have the right to have feelings and make choices based on those feelings.  After all, if a lady feels she doesn't want to see someone, does she even need a reason?  

I guess I just don't get it...

Have fun, MG

Re:Martian Love-damn skippy, I would LOL

Hey Mel,  do you know any Martian ladies with 10,000 antennaes?  Some providers talk about four hand massage.  I wonder what it would be like to get a 10,000 antennae massage.  I would like to find out some day!!! LOL!!!

Ultimately, I agree with you. I was told by a couple of posters on the National board that I was missing the original poster's point. Ultimately, the message from those outraged by the subject of these threads is "How dare you!"

thirsty