Boston

I agree
nothrofboston 24 Reviews 724 reads
posted
1 / 10

I may or may not see this provider again, but it won't be for lack of skills or looks. I've never done this type of post before, but the reviewer had a great time and gave, imo an inaccurate score for performance.  

Am I wrong? Is this number aligned with his review? Just looking for opinions.  

https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1829952

Foodyguy 29 Reviews 389 reads
posted
2 / 10

The numeric ratings seem to be too often a crap shoot.  Some rate extremely high in hopes of.......

Some rate with the concept that a ten is really a once in a life time and anything above 5 is positive.

If one just looks at the ratings rather than the review, remember to truly value the averages.

jdentente 19 Reviews 287 reads
posted
3 / 10

Numbers don't mean much anymore, after all I've seen 7's with "should have stayed home". If you have a 7 at home, what gives?

MasterZen 34 Reviews 305 reads
posted
4 / 10

Appearance : 7 - Attractive does not equate mentally to me as "absolutely lovely" or "stunnning", although he later does summarize her as "very attractive".

Performance : 7 - Hot Time sounds like the description, but she is eligible for a 10 based upon her menu. I would have expected an 8 or 9 from the description.

If you look at her reviews statistically, the review is not outside of what you would expect for appearance; it is just shy of 2 std devs from the low score you might expect without special cause. In this case, the review makes it plain there was no special cause and the reviewer looks like he is a habitually low scorer on appearance. For performance, his score seems to be about the same; statistically normal, but so far on the low side as to almost be an outlier - and in my view not what he described.

Hard to knock the scores as they are to be expected sooner or later on a normal curve, but I'll bet I can show that the reviewer is habitually a low scorer, regardless of his words.

Sorry, I was bored and had excel open

nothrofboston 24 Reviews 332 reads
posted
5 / 10

If this guy ever meets a 10 performance wise, he better bring his heart meds or a resuscitater. Lol ... I know ymmv, but PL is pretty electric. Been there, no review. Long story

MasterZen 34 Reviews 310 reads
posted
6 / 10

and she seems great. This one review, while very flatteringly worded, seems to be rated low. Nothing in it that would discourage me from seeing Paige at all.  

FYI, For comparison here are a few randomly chosen Women scoring at about "7" on "Rank My Photo":

SusieQ - 7.21 - 4970
http://www.rankmyphotos.com/fullpicture.php?u=susieq_998&id=44055

Hunter - 6.8 - 8057
http://www.rankmyphotos.com/pics/img4c6121ef39dec.jpg

Julia - 6.65 - 609
http://www.rankmyphotos.com/fullpicture.php?u=julia6882&id=16159

Hooligan - 6.97 - 270
http://www.rankmyphotos.com/fullpicture.php?u=hooligan123&id=56145

Nevada - 7.83 - 357
http://www.rankmyphotos.com/fullpicture.php?u=nevada-jpg&id=55880

Josie - 7.46 - 686
http://www.rankmyphotos.com/fullpicture.php?u=josiecardinell&id=40361

Paigelynn625 See my TER Reviews 341 reads
posted
7 / 10

I was not faltered to see 7s myself
Although the review reflected a much high score.
Theirfor this really perplexs me.
Us providers that strive hard to be great at what we do, much prefer a 8 over a 7.
Again its baffling.
But I will say if you look at what 7 means. Its not bad !!
But why a 7... IDK !!!

nothrofboston 24 Reviews 258 reads
posted
8 / 10

the review was better than the score. My thought is that based off that review, I'd want to see you regardless of the numbers.  

He should consider having his score modified to reflect his words

Paigelynn625 See my TER Reviews 176 reads
posted
9 / 10
Jenna_Jordan See my TER Reviews 175 reads
posted
10 / 10
Register Now!