I just want to post I am concerned about a review that Stephie of Bella Donna received recently. The review is not consistent with other reviews and I think it should be reviewed and possibly pulled.

We cant have reviews polluting this board that are either false or very inaccurate. Such a low performance rating is just not possible!

I want to back Stephie as she is a great provider and The Bella Donna is a great agency! I have dealt with them for many years.

-- Modified on 8/24/2008 7:37:59 PM

You should get the gold medal for ass kisser

point because you're pissed that your review of Stacy was pulled for being fake, but you are going about it in a very wrong way.

You are accusing another hobbyist, who, by the way will be very vocal about this judging from his posting history, of writing a fake review just to prove a point.  I really, really advise you not to continue with this.

The difference, of course, between what you are doing right now and the earlier issue with you and Stacy is that SHE accused YOU of writing a fake review.  NO Third Party did until you began to admit to lies.  For you to come on here and attack Muffyluver0 like this for your own personal agenda is very wrong and will destroy your credibility even more.

Also, if you haven't contacted the provider and gotten her, or the agency's support, you are doing them all a disservice with this.

Please, just step back for awhile, let it blow over, and come back gently.  Unless, of course, you are trying to go out with a bang, which is, unfortunately, just about what's going to happen.

Good luck, I think you're going to need it if you persist with this.

I see absolutely nothing wrong with the review.  He clearly says what was good and what was bad.  The board is best when people are objective in regards to their reviews--either positive or negative.  Pulling reviews because someone's experience doesn't mimic their own is 'prollution' and at the end of the day is no different than shilling.

Unfortunately, he just might be a Buckeye fan in your territory who lacks the Midas touch of the maize and blue!

I would just STFU!

Same thing that Dixie_Chicken said, but short and to the point.

I hope he hasn't gone on hiatus because this one should be funny.

"It is what it is."

Now that I have some attention, which is pretty easy these days, I am not ACTUALLY calling the review or the reviewer into question. Yea I know that is what I said, but I am calling into question the person/s who leave, allow, pull, etc reviews. I just used the words I was given for my review of Stacy being pulled, and they are, "it was not consistent with the other reviews for this person". That is one crappy criteria to use to accept or reject a review.

I am not upset with anyone here, you are doing what you believe to be correct and I respect that, the only problem I have is that the review is legit, accurate, the meeting happened, and no one wants to accept that, WHY ?????  And if you think my wording is harsh, so!! The reviews have to be GRAPHIC, either way, I chose to write it that way and will stay with it.

Ladys, Gentlemen, if I have a good time, I will write it, if I don't I will write it, that is who I am.

Lastly, Stacy, I am still waiting for the up to date photo to be published!!!

-- Modified on 8/25/2008 7:53:47 AM

I think that you know that the review was pulled because she said that the encounter did not happen.   You even said that it was a NCNS at first, but then changed your story.

OTOH the encounter you are describing is not in doubt.  It happened, and the reviewer was honest.

So were you lying then or now?

-- Modified on 8/25/2008 7:56:01 AM

You can look on my website ( yes she is back with us yet again and see her photos that I personally took in March of this year, and did not touch up or photoshop (I havent yet figured out how to do anything with photoshop except blur faces, crop and turn pics to black and white) LOL. I also believe that she has some new face pictures on her personal site.

Jill

I hardly think a "nice time" is a low performance rating.

The review was not bad at all.  The reviewer in question has a long reviewing history and several white list referrals. He has a right to award whatever performance number he wants based on his experience.  The fact is you are bringing more attention to the review than it probably would have gotten on it's own as part of her profile.

You're still bitching about that Stacy thing??

What else could it be?